--- title: "Is 227gp.com a Scam? Trust Score 5/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "227gp.com" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is 227gp.com a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100" trust_score: 5 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/227gp.com assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is 227gp.com a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** 227gp.com shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 7 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 4 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (114 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR2) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the 227gp.com homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/227gp.com/screenshots/first.png) _What 227gp.com served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview The site is a single-page web presence for 227gp.com. Its page title presents it as the official website of a Russian-language city polyclinic ("Городская поликлиника №227"), so a visitor sees what looks like a public healthcare institution's portal. Its apparent purpose is to pass as the online face of a municipal medical facility. No independent evidence ties the domain to any such institution, and the surrounding technical and reputational record is strongly adverse. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk The principal concern is the reputational record. Several independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and it is listed on an external blacklist. This is a confirmed adverse listing, not a soft reputational hint. It sits poorly with the page's claim to be an "official site" of a municipal clinic. A genuine public-health institution would be expected to sit on a long-established, institutionally anchored domain. This one is only a few months old, and nothing independently links it to a real clinic. Healthcare branding is also a common lure for credential and personal-data harvesting, because visitors readily accept appointment, patient-account and insurance requests. No conflicting legal entities were found, no wallet-draining, clipboard-hijack or cloaking behaviour was observed, and no hidden or external-posting password forms were detected. The listings are therefore the decisive adverse factor, not on-page exploit mechanics. The behavioural run showed a heavy burst of DOM rewriting after interaction and repeated front-end console errors. These indicate an unstable or hastily assembled page, but they are not evidence of exploitation on their own. The posture is a clearly high-risk one for any interaction that involves personal, medical or payment data. Evidence: - Homepage: the title claims to be the official site of a city polyclinic, and the domain has no independently verifiable link to such an institution. - Reputation: multiple security engines classify the domain as malicious or suspicious, and it also appears on an external blacklist. - Provenance: the domain was registered in 2026 (about 0.37 years, roughly 136 days old). The web archive shows 114 snapshots, all captured on 2026-07-12 (1 year tracked), so there is no earlier history. - Homepage behaviour: three sandbox runs completed with 8 console errors and a peak of 1,424 DOM mutations after interaction. No wallet, clipboard or external-credential-form abuse was detected. ### Regulatory Verification Notes Nothing was captured that substantiates the clinic's status. The page carries no verifiable healthcare licence or municipal or state registration, and no operator identity was independently confirmed. Page-level identity analysis was unavailable, so the on-page "official" claim cannot be treated as established. For a site presenting itself as a public medical facility, the lack of any verifiable institutional anchor matters more than for an ordinary commercial site. This is a verification gap that compounds the confirmed adverse listings. It is not a separate finding of wrongdoing. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record matched the domain. The transport encryption is valid, but it is a basic domain-validated certificate. It shows only that traffic is encrypted, not who operates the site. Evidence: - Hosting: served from AS205431 (HostLab LLC, Kazakhstan, RIPE region), a data-centre and web-hosting network. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YR2 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2027-01-19. - Registration: the domain is held through the registrar Spaceship, Inc., created 2026-06-12 and expiring 2027-06-12. - Broker context: no match in the third-party broker-reputation dataset, so there is no external corroboration of an institutional identity. ### What to Verify Next Any claim of affiliation with a real polyclinic should be checked only through channels independent of this site. The clinic's name and number should be searched in the official health-authority or municipal registry of the relevant jurisdiction. The registry's published web address and telephone line should then be used to confirm whether 227gp.com is an authorised domain. Any appointment, patient-portal or insurance request that arrived through this site should be confirmed with the institution directly by phone or in person, using contact details taken from the official registry. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed the same way. Evidence: - Homepage: the official-site claim has no verifiable registry reference to check against. - Registration: the domain is only months old, so no long-standing institutional web presence can be cited to support the claim. - Reputation: the active third-party threat listings should be rechecked with the listing sources before any decision is revisited. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is elevated risk. Confirmed adverse reputation listings combine with a very young domain, an unverified institutional claim and no independent link to the organisation the page names. The modest technical hygiene seen does not offset this, and the evidence points to a site that should be treated as unsafe for sensitive interaction. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is served from a single address at a commodity hosting provider. It has no CDN or WAF in front of it, so the origin server is directly exposed and no protective layer mitigates the reputational risk. The hosting address itself has no abuse-report history, which is a minor neutral point and does not change the overall assessment. ### Closing Assessment At most, the site should be viewed read-only. Logins, credentials, personal or medical data and payments should be withheld until the operator's identity is confirmed through an official registry and the threat listings are cleared. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, hosting and network, registration and ownership, behaviour in a sandbox. ### 01 Governance - A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`) ### 02 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered between three and six months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ### 05 Behaviour in a sandbox - The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`) - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of 227gp.com. - The request stayed on 227gp.com. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under Spaceship, Inc.. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by spaceship.net, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-06-12. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-07-12. (Clear) - It is hosted on HostLab, from a server in KZ. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Spaceship, Inc. | | Hosting | HostLab - HostLab LLC, KZ | | Country | KZ | | Server IP | 206.223.242.104 | | Name servers | LAUNCH1.SPACESHIP.NET, LAUNCH2.SPACESHIP.NET | | CDN / edge network | Not detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 1 | | Edge IP addresses | 0 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 1 | | SSL issuer | YR2 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-19 | | Domain age | 0.37 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-06-12 | | Archive first seen | 2026-07-12 | | Archive snapshots | 114 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 7 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about 227gp.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [epoksis.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/epoksis.com), also hosted by HostLAB (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [gstockbnb.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gstockbnb.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100) - [revenuehttp.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/revenuehttp.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [dagtaxupdate.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dagtaxupdate.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [revenueworking.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/revenueworking.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [revenuehoursend.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/revenuehoursend.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [vieveijvejibvebverhrh.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vieveijvejibvebverhrh.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 6/100) - [onrevault.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/onrevault.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [demo-vercel.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/demo-vercel.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [custodial-dextradingclaims.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/custodial-dextradingclaims.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/227gp.com) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/227gp.com · assessed 2026-10-27.*