--- title: "Is airdrop-stonkfun.com a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "airdrop-stonkfun.com" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is airdrop-stonkfun.com a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/airdrop-stonkfun.com assessed: 2026-10-22 --- # Is airdrop-stonkfun.com a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** airdrop-stonkfun.com shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 1 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (3 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the airdrop-stonkfun.com homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/airdrop-stonkfun.com/screenshots/first.png) _What airdrop-stonkfun.com served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. The domain airdrop-stonkfun.com presents itself as a cryptocurrency "airdrop" landing site, with a name that pairs a token-giveaway keyword with a meme-token-style brand. Its apparent purpose is to attract visitors with a free-token or claim offer. When the homepage was loaded, a Cloudflare challenge page titled "Suspected Phishing" was served in place of ordinary content, so no operator-authored text, product description or claim flow could be read. The domain was registered only weeks before the assessment. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Confirmed contradictory signals are present, and the assessment is clearly cautionary. Several external reputation sources currently flag the domain. Multiple security engines report it as malicious, a further group classify it as suspicious, and a major network-security vendor lists it as a threat. Together these amount to a confirmed blacklisting. The only page observed at the homepage was a challenge interstitial labelled as suspected phishing. The naming pattern, an "airdrop" keyword attached to a token-style brand, matches the common structure of crypto giveaway lures that ask visitors to connect a wallet or approve a transaction. No wallet-connection prompt, clipboard manipulation or external credential form was triggered during the three automated browsing runs. That is a limited observation, because the real content was gated. Runtime behaviour was nonetheless unusual. Nearly all network activity went to third-party hosts: about ninety-one external background requests and nine external data submissions in a short session. The page also threw seventeen console errors and rebuilt over fifteen hundred page elements after interaction. This points to a heavily script-driven front end whose true behaviour is hidden from automated inspection. No conflicting legal identities and no confirmed impersonation of a specific named brand were established. Evidence: - Homepage: served a bot-challenge page with a 403 status, titled as suspected phishing, instead of site content. - Domain registration: created 2026-09-11 (~0.11 years old) through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED, expiring 2027-09-11. - Web archive: 3 snapshots spanning 2026-09-11 to 2026-09-12 (1 year tracked), consistent with a newly created site. - Homepage runtime: 91 external background requests, 9 external POSTs, 17 console errors and a peak of 1,523 DOM mutations across three runs. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No licensing, registration or legal-entity information could be observed. The only page retrieved was a security interstitial, so no terms, about or contact page was available to assess. Disclosure therefore cannot be called adequate or inadequate. Registrant details are incomplete, which constitutes ownership opacity. That is an administrative limitation and not an identity contradiction. No third-party broker or regulator-style reputation entry matched this domain. The reputational concern rests on the threat detections described above, and nothing in the evidence suggests the operator holds any financial or token-distribution authorization. The valid TLS certificate adds nothing on legitimacy, because domain-validated certificates are issued to any domain controller. Evidence: - Homepage: no company name, licence number, jurisdiction or terms of service was visible. - Transport security: certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-10. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Reputation databases: no broker or regulatory-register match for the domain. ### What to Verify Next Any project whose name the domain evokes should be checked through its own independently known website and verified social channels. The checks should confirm whether an airdrop or token claim exists at all, and whether this domain is referenced there. The route by which the link was received (a message, advertisement or social post) should be treated as untrusted and examined for how it reached the recipient. Security teams should review organisational logs for any prior visits or wallet interactions with the domain. Wallets that have already interacted with it should have outstanding token approvals reviewed and revoked. A single check of the claimed operator's licensing status with the relevant registry is warranted only if a legal entity is later identified. Evidence: - Homepage: the challenge interstitial prevented any review of the claimed offer or its claim flow. - Domain history: the domain's creation weeks ago means there is no prior track record to rely on. - Runtime behaviour: heavy third-party data transfer means any interaction could expose data to undisclosed parties. ### Summary Verdict The site is assessed as high-risk and not trustworthy. Active threat detections from several independent sources, a very recent registration and an unexplained script-heavy front end converge on a posture consistent with a credential-harvesting or wallet-draining lure. The technical hygiene visible on the site is common to all web properties and does not offset this conclusion. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF. All four observed addresses are Cloudflare edge servers and no origin host could be identified, so the real hosting location cannot be independently confirmed. Bot protection is active, and it prevented normal content retrieval. This reduces exposure of the underlying server but is only a mitigating factor. It does not offset the external threat detections. Content behind the edge can also be changed rapidly without visible hosting changes. The valid, long-dated certificate and the identified network are routine properties of the platform. ### Closing Assessment The domain should not be used for login, wallet connection, token approvals, payment or the entry of any personal or credential data. If the site was visited, any connected wallets should be disconnected and their approvals revoked. The link and domain should be reported to the relevant security teams and blocked at the network or email layer where possible. Any airdrop claim should be pursued only through channels reached independently of this domain. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) ### 05 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of airdrop-stonkfun.com. - The request stayed on airdrop-stonkfun.com. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-09-11. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-11. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3031::6815:241 | | Name servers | EZRA.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, POPPY.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-10 | | Domain age | 0.11 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-09-11 | | Archive first seen | 2026-09-11 | | Archive snapshots | 3 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about airdrop-stonkfun.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [xamanswap.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xamanswap.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [theroomemes.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/theroomemes.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [portal-tart.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-tart.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [hrcke.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hrcke.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [hyperliquidexclusivenft.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hyperliquidexclusivenft.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [itrustcapitaltaxreform.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/itrustcapitaltaxreform.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [kinetiq-en.firebaseapp.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/kinetiq-en.firebaseapp.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [qwblock.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/qwblock.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [ipumpi.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ipumpi.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [dexbank.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dexbank.io), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/airdrop-stonkfun.com) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/airdrop-stonkfun.com · assessed 2026-10-22.*