--- title: "Is aml-scan-risk.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "aml-scan-risk.vercel.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is aml-scan-risk.vercel.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-scan-risk.vercel.app assessed: 2026-10-22 --- # Is aml-scan-risk.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** aml-scan-risk.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 16 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 84 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 7 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (2 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the aml-scan-risk.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/aml-scan-risk.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png) _What aml-scan-risk.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website presents itself as an anti-money-laundering verification service for the TRON TRC20 ecosystem. Its page title advertises a wallet risk score and sanctions screening, so its apparent purpose is to let visitors submit blockchain wallet details and receive a compliance-style risk assessment. It runs as a single-page front end on a free-tier subdomain of a general-purpose web hosting platform, not on a dedicated branded domain. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This is the decisive section of the report. Several independent security engines, including multiple tier-one vendors, currently classify the domain as malicious. The reputation evidence is strong enough that the domain is **blacklisted** by external threat-intelligence sources. The domain was registered only days before the assessment, and its archive history is minimal. A service that sells trust (sanctions screening and wallet risk scoring) from a brand-new, flagged domain is a recognised lure pattern. Visitors who are worried about compliance exposure are the people most likely to paste wallet addresses or follow prompts without scrutiny. In the homepage's runtime behaviour, the page made a high proportion of its requests to external destinations. These included a notable number of external background requests and external POST submissions, some of them to destinations outside the commonly recognised set. That is consistent with data leaving the page to third parties during normal use. The sandbox did not observe wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, credential forms posting off-site, or content cloaking. These are mitigating observations, but they do not outweigh the external detections. No conflicting legal identities or confirmed brand impersonation were observed on the pages analysed. Evidence: - Homepage and domain provenance: the domain was registered in 2026 and is roughly 9 days old. - Web archive: 2 snapshots, both captured on 2026-10-12, with a tracked history of about 1 year. - Homepage runtime behaviour: 13 external background requests and 14 external POST submissions across 3 sandbox runs, with about 3 of each going to non-whitelisted destinations. The page also logged 3 console errors. - Homepage security reputation: flagged as malicious by multiple security engines, including three tier-one vendors, and independently confirmed as blacklisted. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site operates in a domain where legitimacy is normally anchored in an identifiable, registered operator: AML screening and sanctions checks. No independent regulatory registration could be matched, and no third-party broker-reputation record exists for the site. The operator's real-world identity could not be connected to any known company or person. Ownership details are incomplete, and this is treated as ownership opacity, not as an identity contradiction. The lack of regulatory standing is a verification gap, not proof of wrongdoing, but here it compounds the confirmed reputation problem instead of offsetting it. The transport encryption is valid. It is a basic domain-validated certificate, which shows only that the connection is encrypted and does not show who operates the site. Evidence: - Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US) in the US. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 at DV validation level, valid to 2026-11-27 (36 days remaining). - Regulatory and broker records: no matching regulatory registration or broker-reputation entry. - Homepage: the page captured successfully with substantial text content. No verified link between the site and a real-world brand or operator could be established. ### What to Verify Next Any organisation claiming to operate this screening service should be asked to confirm, through its own established and independently sourced channels, whether this property belongs to it. The claimed operator's licensing or registration should be checked directly with the relevant financial-intelligence or registry authority, using details obtained independently of this site. Blockchain addresses of real interest should be screened only through providers whose identity and regulatory standing are already established. Re-testing after the operator or hosting platform remediates the flagged content would show whether the malicious classification has cleared. Evidence: - Homepage: the service's claim to provide TRON TRC20 wallet risk scoring and sanctions screening cannot be tied to an identifiable operator. - Domain provenance: the very recent registration gives no track record on which to rest trust. - Outbound traffic: the non-whitelisted external POST destinations observed in the sandbox have not been attributed to any known service. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high-risk. Converging external threat detections and a confirmed blacklisting, together with a very young domain and an unverifiable operator, override the technically sound transport security and the absence of observed wallet-drainer or cloaking behaviour. The available evidence does not support treating this website as a legitimate compliance or screening service. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is delivered through a managed web platform and CDN on Amazon-operated cloud infrastructure, and every observed address is an edge node, so no origin server was visible. Edge-only visibility prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content swaps. The platform's protections are a mitigating factor only and cannot offset the reputation risk. A large number of abuse reports are attached to one of the edge addresses. They apply to a shared provider address used by many unrelated sites and are therefore discounted, but they are not independent evidence in this site's favour. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet-address submission, or any financial interaction. Passive viewing is the outer limit of acceptable use, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Anyone who has already submitted information to it should treat that data as exposed and monitor the related accounts and wallets. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`) ### 05 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 84 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.3 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of aml-scan-risk.vercel.app. - The request stayed on aml-scan-risk.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-12. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 216.198.79.3 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 6 | | Edge IP addresses | 6 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WR1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 | | Domain age | 0.02 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-12 | | Archive snapshots | 2 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 16 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 84 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about aml-scan-risk.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [sendusdt-2.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sendusdt-2.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [arcadepadapp.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/arcadepadapp.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 16/100) - [send-usdt-1-chi.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-usdt-1-chi.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [mmmm-lilac.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mmmm-lilac.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [getblockaml.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/getblockaml.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [aml-wallet-scanner.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-wallet-scanner.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [trustwallet-secure-check.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trustwallet-secure-check.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [click-to-transsfer.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-to-transsfer.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [onchainwhalledistro.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/onchainwhalledistro.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100) - [baysedlaboratory.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/baysedlaboratory.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-scan-risk.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-scan-risk.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-22.*