--- title: "Is aml-sec.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "aml-sec.vercel.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is aml-sec.vercel.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-sec.vercel.app assessed: 2026-10-22 --- # Is aml-sec.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** aml-sec.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 16 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 81 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted | | Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the aml-sec.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/aml-sec.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png) _What aml-sec.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. AMLSec presents itself as an institutional blockchain anti-money-laundering intelligence and forensic analytics platform focused on the TRON network. It is published as a subdomain on a shared application-hosting platform. Its homepage is a text-heavy marketing page that frames the service as compliance and investigative tooling, apparently aimed at professional and institutional users. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and decisive. Several major security vendors independently flag the site as malicious, and a confirmed **blacklist** listing exists, so the external reputation picture is clearly adverse. A compliance and forensics brand would normally be expected to carry strong reputational standing, so this combination is a pronounced mismatch. A credible AML brand would also be unlikely to launch on a free shared-platform subdomain. The site's browser behaviour adds corroboration. During interaction, almost all observed network traffic went to external destinations, and a notable share of it went to non-allowlisted third parties. That includes several outbound data submissions to parties outside the site's own domain. No wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, cloaking, or credential forms posting off-site were observed. The adverse picture therefore rests on external threat detections and outbound data flows rather than on a visible drainer mechanism. Abuse reports recorded against one of the shared platform addresses are discounted, because they relate to infrastructure used by many unrelated tenants and not specifically to this site. No conflicting legal identities or confirmed brand impersonation were observed. Evidence: - Homepage: the page title markets "institutional TRON blockchain AML intelligence & forensic analytics", which presents authority and compliance expertise that nothing else in the evidence supports. - Behavioural sandbox across three successful runs: about 29 external network events, 12 to non-allowlisted destinations, 15 outbound POST requests, 6 of them to non-allowlisted parties. - Threat-intelligence aggregation: 16 malicious and 1 suspicious detections, including three tier-one security vendors (Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos), which triggered an automatic score ceiling. - Shared-platform abuse reports (81, across Vercel infrastructure) are attributed to common provider addresses and carry no weight against the site itself. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site's on-page disclosure of operator identity, licensing, and registration is unclear. A platform that markets itself as institutional AML tooling would normally state its operating entity, jurisdiction, and any relevant registrations. None of that was established from the evidence. The shared-subdomain deployment also means there is no standalone registrable domain to anchor ownership. This is a governance and transparency limitation, not an identity contradiction, because no conflicting entity names were found. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists for the site, so there is no external reputational context either way. The site's real-world operator therefore remains unconnected to any verifiable institution. Evidence: - Homepage: no verifiable operating entity, licence, or registration reference could be tied to the AML positioning. - Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US), registry ARIN, on a shared application platform. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1, domain-validated only (DV), valid to 2026-11-27. This confirms an encrypted channel but no organisational identity. ### What to Verify Next Before any engagement, the claimed operator should be matched to a real organisation through independent, offline channels, such as a registry search in the jurisdiction it claims. Any partner, customer, or regulator references the site makes should be confirmed directly with those parties, not through links on the site. The official contact channels of the supposed provider should be established from sources outside this site. Any data already submitted to the site should be reviewed, and any shared credentials rotated. Evidence: - Homepage: institutional and forensic-grade claims are made without verifiable third-party attestation. - Outbound traffic: submissions to non-allowlisted destinations mean any data entered could reach parties unrelated to the site. - Reputation checks: multiple major vendors currently list the site, so re-checking its status after any claimed remediation is warranted. ### Summary Verdict The site carries an elevated, clearly cautionary risk posture. Confirmed external threat detections outweigh its technically sound baseline, and nothing in the evidence connects it to an identifiable, accountable institution. Its appearance of professionalism does not offset the adverse reputation, and it should not be treated as a trustworthy compliance provider. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site resolves to Amazon-hosted edge addresses on a shared application platform, and all observed addresses are edge servers, so the origin server was not observable. This arrangement is a mitigating factor: it indicates mainstream, professionally operated infrastructure with a valid certificate. It is not evidence of legitimacy. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of where content is actually served from, and it can mask rapid content changes. ### Closing Assessment The site should be limited to passive viewing at most. No login, credential entry, data submission, or financial interaction should take place with it, and any engagement should wait until the operator is independently verified and the external detections are cleared. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page exchanged network traffic with destinations TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_TRAFFIC`) - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 81 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.131 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of aml-sec.vercel.app. - The request stayed on aml-sec.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 64.29.17.131 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 6 | | Edge IP addresses | 6 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WR1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 16 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 81 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about aml-sec.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [germanyexchange.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/germanyexchange.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [safetrust-sigma.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/safetrust-sigma.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [xmagnetics.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xmagnetics.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [tron-risk-check.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tron-risk-check.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [mintest-phi.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mintest-phi.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100) - [claim-noderzz-s1.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-noderzz-s1.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [send-secure-trustwallet-usdt-bip20.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-secure-trustwallet-usdt-bip20.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [mmmm-sepia-nine.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mmmm-sepia-nine.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [ervnjvnjnvsjknvskdjnvjs.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ervnjvnjnvsjknvskdjnvjs.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [trade-world.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trade-world.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) - [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-sec.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-sec.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-22.*