--- title: "Is amlscan-trc20.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "amlscan-trc20.vercel.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is amlscan-trc20.vercel.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/amlscan-trc20.vercel.app assessed: 2026-10-21 --- # Is amlscan-trc20.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** amlscan-trc20.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | AmlScan TRC20 presents itself as a TRON/TRC20 AML compliance tool that screens wallets and USDT TRC20 transactions for sanctions exposure, mixer activity and other on-chain risk. It charges nothing for the first check and $1 for each check after that, and it asks visitors to connect a TRON wallet. Its compliance and regulatory claims are not backed by a named legal entity or verifiable sanctions-source details. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 17 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 84 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 29 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the amlscan-trc20.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/amlscan-trc20.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png) _What amlscan-trc20.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. AmlScan TRC20 is a single-page web service that presents itself as a TRON/TRC20 anti-money-laundering compliance tool. It says it screens wallet addresses and USDT TRC20 transactions for sanctions exposure, mixer activity and other on-chain risk indicators. The homepage advertises a free first check and a flat $1 for each check after that. It also offers a sample report, downloadable PDF reports, address monitoring, and bulk/API and enterprise plans priced on request. It runs as pay-per-check software and asks visitors to connect a TRON wallet to use it. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This site carries a **confirmed adverse reputation**. It is currently blacklisted by multiple independent security-detection sources, and several well-established security vendors are among those that flag it as malicious. That is the decisive risk factor. The site's protective hosting and valid encryption do not offset it. The homepage's wallet-connection flow compounds the exposure. It lists a dozen or more wallet brands, including TronLink, MetaMask, Ledger, Binance Web3 Wallet and OKX. It prompts visitors to accept a connection request and sign a transaction. Its FAQ reassures visitors that "we never have access to your funds", but nothing on the page lets that assurance be checked. The payment recipient and payment method for the $1 checks are never stated. Visitors would be asked to authorise wallet activity without knowing who receives the money. The site markets itself as regulator-grade sanctions screening aligned with international AML standards. Yet it names no legal entity and gives no business address. It also does not say which sanctions lists or data sources it screens against. That gap between the compliance claims and the supporting evidence is the main content-level red flag. Two further points are weaker. The site runs on a subdomain of a shared application-hosting platform, and its name was flagged as strongly resembling that platform's own domain. This is a similarity flag only, and no impersonation was confirmed. The site also sent a notable share of its network requests to third-party destinations. These included several data submissions to destinations outside the platform's known services. The sandbox saw no wallet-drainer behaviour, clipboard tampering, cloaking or hidden forms. A large number of abuse reports exist against the shared platform address the site resolves to. Those reports are attributed to the platform's shared infrastructure and have been discounted. They are not evidence against this site's operator. Evidence: - Homepage and reputation checks: 17 security engines flagged the site as malicious and 2 as suspicious, with at least three tier-one vendors among them. - Homepage wallet-connect prompt and FAQ: wallet-connection and transaction-signing flow with an unverifiable "we never have access to your funds" assurance, and no stated payment recipient. - Domain registration: the domain is approximately 28 days old (about 0.08 years), consistent with a newly stood-up service making compliance claims. - Web archive: 1 snapshot, dated 2026, so there is effectively no historical track record. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The homepage is the only substantive page. It carries standard disclaimers and plain pricing, but it discloses no operating company, registered address or named officers. It claims sanctions screening and AML alignment, yet it cites no licence, registration number or regulator, and it names no screening data provider. A tool that markets itself as compliance infrastructure would ordinarily be expected to disclose these. Their absence leaves the compliance claims unsupported and prevents the real-world operator from being connected to the service. Identity is therefore unverified, and any legitimacy suggested by the page is purely on-site assertion. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match was found. That finding is neutral on its own and does not affect the reputational concerns above. Evidence: - Homepage content: regulator-style and FATF-aligned claims appear with no named legal entity, address or sanctions-source details. - Homepage pricing section: the payment method and recipient are not stated, and enterprise and API pricing is "on contact" only. - Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US). - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (domain-validated only), valid to 2026-11-27 (36 days remaining). A DV certificate confirms control of the domain, not the identity of the operator. ### What to Verify Next Any reliance on this service should be preceded by independent confirmation of who operates it. The operator should be identified through an official company registry, with a named entity matched to a verifiable address. The compliance claims should be checked against the relevant AML or virtual-asset service-provider registers. The sanctions-screening methodology should be confirmed through documentation obtained directly from a verified provider, not from this page. Official contact and payment channels should be confirmed through an independent, offline route. If an AML screening need exists, an established, registered screening provider with a verifiable corporate identity should be used instead. Evidence: - Homepage: no named entity, licence or address is available to check, so verification must start from outside the site. - Homepage pricing and wallet flow: payment instructions do not identify the recipient, so the destination of any funds cannot be established from the site. - Reputation findings: the adverse detections should be re-checked with the detecting security vendors before any engagement, to see whether the listing has been cleared. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high-risk. The site's reputation outcome is decisive, and it is reinforced by a very recent, unestablished footprint and compliance claims that cannot be substantiated. The site's operator cannot be linked to any verifiable real-world identity. No contradiction in legal names was found, so the concern rests on the adverse security findings and the lack of evidence behind the site's claims, not on an identity conflict. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is served from Amazon-hosted address space, with all observed addresses belonging to edge servers of a recognised application-hosting and CDN provider. That is a mitigating factor only. It indicates mainstream, professionally operated hosting and a valid, known-issuer certificate. The origin server was not observable. Shared edge hosting also means that content can change quickly and that the infrastructure's reputation is shared among many unrelated tenants. This infrastructure does not offset the reputation risk and provides no assurance about the operator. ### Closing Assessment Interaction should be limited to passive viewing. The site should not be used to connect a wallet, sign transactions, make payments or submit credentials until a verified operator identity is established and the security listings are cleared. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, page content, history in the web archive. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 Page content - The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG`) - The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`) - The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME`) ### 04 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 84 reports on hosting IP 216.198.79.3 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of amlscan-trc20.vercel.app. - The request stayed on amlscan-trc20.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-22. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 216.198.79.3 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 6 | | Edge IP addresses | 6 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WR1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 | | Domain age | 0.08 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-09-22 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 17 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 84 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about amlscan-trc20.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [click-tow-transfer.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-tow-transfer.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [click-bep-bep20.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-bep-bep20.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [doppler-finances.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/doppler-finances.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [wallet-click-tow.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/wallet-click-tow.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [himans-singh.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/himans-singh.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [click-to-enjoy.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-to-enjoy.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [click-bnb-to-click.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-bnb-to-click.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [breadcat-fi-q50.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/breadcat-fi-q50.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [holders-ansem.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/holders-ansem.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [zeta-x.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/zeta-x.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27) - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/amlscan-trc20.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/amlscan-trc20.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-21.*