---
title: "Is amlstatus.us a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "amlstatus.us"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is amlstatus.us a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/amlstatus.us
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is amlstatus.us a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** amlstatus.us shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 5 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 7 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Watch |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (2 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the amlstatus.us homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/amlstatus.us/screenshots/first.png)

_What amlstatus.us served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

AMLBotChecker presents itself on its homepage as a provider of "reliable AMLBot solutions for DeFi compliance", a service pitched at crypto and decentralized-finance users who want anti-money-laundering screening. The page carries a substantial amount of text but is not tied to any named company or product vendor. It is served from a newly registered domain whose name, amlstatus.us, differs from the brand shown in the page title, and its apparent purpose is to attract users seeking compliance or wallet-screening checks.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Reputation sources show **confirmed adverse signals** for this domain. Several independent detection engines currently rate it malicious, and a further engine rates it suspicious. One of these is a top-tier network-security vendor, so the detections are not confined to low-quality feeds. Together they amount to a blacklisting that the available evidence does not explain or discount. No identity contradiction was observed, because the evidence contains no conflicting legal-entity names. No wallet-draining behavior, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or cloaking was seen in the sandbox runs. The risk therefore rests on the blacklist, not on a proven attack mechanism. Two further factors raise the concern. The domain is only months old, with almost no independent history. The branding shown on the homepage ("AMLBotChecker", a name echoing an established compliance-tool category) does not match the domain name. A compliance-themed lure aimed at DeFi users is a recognized pattern for deceiving people into trusting a site with wallet or account details. These facts do not prove impersonation, but they justify a security-forward stance. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page title advertises "AMLBotChecker: Reliable AMLBot Solutions for DeFi Compliance" on a domain named amlstatus.us, a brand-to-domain mismatch.
- Domain reputation: five engines report the domain as malicious and one as suspicious, with a tier-one vendor among those flagging it.
- Provenance: the domain was registered on 2026-04-09 (~0.55 years old), and the web archive holds only 2 snapshots, both from 2026-09-03 (1 year tracked).

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site markets compliance-related services, yet no licensing, registration or regulatory identifier could be tied to it. No third-party regulatory source confirms the operator, and no broker-reputation record matches the domain. This is a verification gap, not evidence of wrongdoing on its own. The WHOIS record lists a registrant called "citrust 619" with an organization of "Itech". Nothing on the site links either name to the brand presented on the page, so the operator's real-world identity remains unconfirmed. The adverse reputation signals above are the reason this gap matters more than it would on a neutral site. Evidence:

- Registration: the domain is registered through Namecheap, and the WHOIS record expires 2027-04-09.
- Hosting: the site is served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is domain-validated only (DV), issued by WE1 and valid to 2027-01-02. This confirms encryption but says nothing about who operates the site.

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction, confirm independently whether a service branded AMLBotChecker exists, through the official channel of the established compliance-tool provider it appears to echo, and check that this domain is listed there. Check any claimed licence or registration number against the relevant public registry, and obtain the operator's legal name through an offline or independently sourced route. Confirm the official support and contact channels the same way. Do not rely on contact details published on this site. The sandbox session showed one further matter worth clarifying: the site contacts third-party services extensively, so any data entered would likely leave the domain. Any such data flow should be understood before use. Evidence:

- Behavior: 11 external XHR requests and 4 external POST requests were recorded, and external traffic reached 98.7% of requests at its peak.
- Behavior: the sandbox logged 70 console errors across 3 successful runs, indicating a poorly stabilized or heavily scripted page.
- Behavior: no wallet connection, drainer or clipboard-write activity was triggered in any run.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk. The adverse reputation evidence is decisive, and the newness of the domain and the lack of confirmed identity reinforce it. The supporting technical hygiene is unremarkable and does not offset this.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are edge servers, so the origin host was not visible in this analysis. This setup is common and mildly mitigating, since it shows a functioning, encrypted deployment. It does not vouch for the operator's intent, and edge-only visibility also prevents independent hosting verification and can make rapid content changes harder to detect.


### Closing Assessment

Treat the site as unsafe for any sensitive action. Do not log in, enter credentials, connect a wallet or make payments or other financial transfers. At most, limit use to passive, read-only viewing, and run any compliance screening through a service reached by an independently verified route.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of amlstatus.us.

- The request stayed on amlstatus.us. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under NAMECHEAP INC. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-04-09. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-03. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | NAMECHEAP INC |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3037::ac43:ba06 |
| Name servers | olga.ns.cloudflare.com, rocky.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-02 |
| Domain age | 0.55 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-04-09 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-03 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 5 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about amlstatus.us at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [chainrouter.us](https://trustsniffer.com/report/chainrouter.us), another .us site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 4/100)
- [blockchainfx.us](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockchainfx.us), another .us site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [1tg.us](https://trustsniffer.com/report/1tg.us), another .us site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [1pps.us](https://trustsniffer.com/report/1pps.us), another .us site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [cashcat-claim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cashcat-claim.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [basisex.cyou](https://trustsniffer.com/report/basisex.cyou), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [netnetcapitallaunch.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/netnetcapitallaunch.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 19/100)
- [coincommunityvotingopenzone.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coincommunityvotingopenzone.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [flapshdashboard.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flapshdashboard.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [laptoptoken.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/laptoptoken.pro), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/amlstatus.us) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/amlstatus.us · assessed 2026-10-26.*