---
title: "Is aster-exchange.vercel.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 29/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "aster-exchange.vercel.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is aster-exchange.vercel.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 29/100"
trust_score: 29
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/aster-exchange.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is aster-exchange.vercel.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 29/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 29/100.** aster-exchange.vercel.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 82 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the aster-exchange.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/aster-exchange.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What aster-exchange.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website presents itself as "Aster Exchange", a perpetual decentralized exchange (DEX) whose landing page advertises next-generation derivatives trading with leverage of up to 1001x. It is served from a subdomain of a shared application-hosting platform rather than from a dedicated brand domain. Its apparent purpose is to attract traders to leveraged crypto-derivatives products.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they drive the cautionary posture of this report. Multiple threat-intelligence engines currently flag the site as malicious or suspicious, and the aggregate reputation assessment is a **confirmed blacklist** hit. No conflicting legal identities were found, and no brand impersonation or phishing was confirmed. Even so, the external detections alone are decisive. A site that advertises extreme leverage of up to 1001x, and that is positioned as an exchange under a branded name on a shared-platform subdomain, fits a high-risk archetype in which funds are solicited from users who cannot easily check who operates the service. The site's own claims are not independently confirmed to belong to any real-world brand or operator. A large volume of abuse reports exists against the shared edge address the site resolves to. These are attributed to the hosting provider's multi-tenant infrastructure and are discounted as evidence about this site specifically. They are not counted as a finding against it. Behavioral testing was benign: the page made no external data transfers, ran no wallet-draining or clipboard-manipulation routines, and showed no cloaking. This lowers the likelihood of active technical exploitation, but it does not offset the external threat detections. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page title advertises a "Perpetual DEX" with "Up to 1001x Leverage", a high-risk product claim made without visible operator attribution.
- Reputation checks: two engines rated the site malicious and one rated it suspicious, producing a confirmed blacklist classification.
- Shared-infrastructure abuse reports: 82 reports against the edge IP 64.29.17.131, discounted because the address is a shared CDN address of the hosting provider.
- Sandbox runs: 3 of 3 sessions loaded successfully with zero external requests and zero wallet-connect or drainer behavior.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

Independent identity verification of the operator was not achieved, and the legal and disclosure position on the site remains unclear. No third-party broker or regulatory record matched this site. Absence of a match is not a verdict, but leveraged derivatives and exchange services are regulated activities in many jurisdictions, so the lack of any confirmable licensing or entity information weakens the claim to be a legitimate exchange. This is a verification gap. It is distinct from the external threat detections, which are what elevate the risk here. The site's TLS certificate is valid and issued by a recognised authority, but it provides only domain-level validation. It confirms encrypted transport and does not confirm who operates the service. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator name, registration number, or licensing authority could be confirmed from the captured content.
- Third-party broker reputation data: no match for this site or its brand name.
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (domain-validated, DV), valid to 2026-11-27, with 32 days remaining.

### What to Verify Next

Any contact with this service should wait until its operator and legal status have been established through independent channels. The brand should be checked against the official channels of any genuine Aster-named exchange, reached through a trusted route rather than links on this site. Confirm whether the operator holds authorization for leveraged derivatives from a financial regulator in the user's jurisdiction. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed independently as well. The status of the threat-intelligence detections should be rechecked after any remediation. Evidence:

- Homepage: the high-leverage perpetual-trading claim should be checked against a regulator's public register.
- Hosting: the site runs on a shared-platform subdomain, so a standalone brand domain with published ownership should be sought for comparison.
- Reputation checks: the current malicious and suspicious detections should be rechecked before any assessment is revised.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk. External threat detections outweigh the benign sandbox behavior, a valid certificate, and the absence of confirmed impersonation or conflicting identities. Legitimacy cannot be presumed, and the operator's real-world identity remains unverified.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is hosted on Vercel's platform, running on Amazon infrastructure in the United States, and all observed addresses are CDN edge servers; the origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only. It indicates a mainstream, well-run platform, but it prevents independent verification of the underlying host and cannot offset the reputation risk. Content on such a platform can also be swapped quickly. Evidence:

- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US), registry ARIN, with six edge IPs observed and no origin candidates.
- Edge posture: the CDN/WAF layer is recognised as trusted infrastructure, but it does not attest to the site's operator.

### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. No login, credential entry, wallet connection, deposit, or other financial interaction is appropriate unless the operator is independently confirmed and the external detections are cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 82 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.131 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of aster-exchange.vercel.app.

- The request stayed on aster-exchange.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.131 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 6 |
| Edge IP addresses | 6 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 82 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about aster-exchange.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [bscscan-uxmq.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bscscan-uxmq.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [arcus-gate-vote.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/arcus-gate-vote.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [click-dt-20.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-dt-20.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [click-todt.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-todt.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [node-live-6882-d3kx2ei95-vercel-project-key.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/node-live-6882-d3kx2ei95-vercel-project-key.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 30/100)
- [b-mp-web3-airdrop-and-nft-tdd1bolt.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/b-mp-web3-airdrop-and-nft-tdd1bolt.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [bsc-dl663k94x.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bsc-dl663k94x.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [bitnestwebapp.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitnestwebapp.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 27/100)
- [trojansecurity.co.za](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trojansecurity.co.za), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 47/100)
- [moneycredit.com.br](https://trustsniffer.com/report/moneycredit.com.br), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 43/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aster-exchange.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/aster-exchange.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-26.*