---
title: "Is bitvavo.fun a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "bitvavo.fun"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is bitvavo.fun a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitvavo.fun
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is bitvavo.fun a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** bitvavo.fun shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | A Solana token voting widget branded as 'Bitvavo Official Voting' that lets visitors paste a contract address, review token details, and cast wallet-verified YES/NO votes with SOL-denominated activity, without verifiable operator identity or disclosed terms. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 5 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2023 (3 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the bitvavo.fun homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/bitvavo.fun/screenshots/first.png)

_What bitvavo.fun served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2023.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

A Solana token community-voting page branded "Bitvavo Official Voting" presents a single-screen widget where a visitor pastes a token contract address, loads token details, and casts YES or NO votes after connecting a crypto wallet. The page shows a live vote feed with SOL amounts beside each vote, and it names no operator, revenue source, or terms. Its apparent purpose is to collect wallet-connected activity around Solana tokens, and its business model is undisclosed.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and serious. The domain is **blacklisted** by multiple external reputation sources, with several independent detections of malicious content, and decisive weight attaches to that. The homepage also behaves differently after interaction than on first load, with both its text and its appearance changing materially. This is a recognised cloaking pattern, in which what an automated reviewer sees differs from what a person who engages sees. The page calls itself "Official" and uses a recognised exchange name, yet it supplies no operator, contact route, or link to any brand owner. This is a gap between claim and evidence rather than a confirmed impersonation. No conflicting legal entities were found, so there is no identity contradiction, but the absence of any named operator leaves the "Official" claim unsupported. The live feed shows a tally of 1012 votes at about 2.2 votes per second, with individual entries between roughly 3 and 73 SOL. These figures cannot be reconciled with the absence of any disclosed fee, deposit, or payout mechanism. They could be fabricated activity designed to create social proof, or they could be real value transfer, and the page gives no means of telling which. Wallet connection is requested "securely" to verify votes, which is the typical entry point for approval-based drain attacks. In the observed sessions no wallet-drainer or clipboard-hijack behaviour was recorded. Evidence:

- Homepage: after interaction, the page's content and layout changed substantially compared with its initial state, which the behavioural analysis rated as strong cloaking.
- Homepage: the title and heading "Bitvavo Official Voting" assert official status, while no operator, legal entity, or contact detail appears anywhere on the page.
- Homepage vote feed: a headline tally of 84% YES (846 YES, 166 NO) is shown beside SOL amounts per vote, such as 72.57 SOL, with no explanation of what those amounts are.
- Domain provenance: registered 2026-06-04 (~0.38 years old). Only 3 web-archive snapshots exist, spanning 2023-02-21 to 2023-02-23 (1 year tracked). They predate the current registration, so the present registration does not match the archived history.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site publishes no legal, terms, privacy, or about pages, and its single page names no operating company, licence, registration number, or physical address. A token-voting service that moves value in SOL and invites wallet connection is a financial-adjacent activity, so these omissions carry more weight than they would on an informational site. In itself the gap does not prove wrongdoing, but here it sits alongside the external detections and cloaking behaviour already described. No third-party broker or regulator database has any record matching the name, so there is no reputational context from that channel in either direction. The page also does not say whether votes are free, fee-bearing, or tied to token purchases, so the user cannot assess their exposure. Evidence:

- Homepage: the only visible navigation entries are Vote, How It Works, Support, and Sign up or Sign in; none leads to legal terms, a privacy notice, or company details.
- Homepage: the page states a copyright year but no rights holder.
- Registration: registered through Dynadot Inc and set to expire 2027-06-04; no registrant identity is visible on the site.
- Hosting and encryption: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc.); the TLS certificate is a domain-validated one issued by WE1, valid to 2026-12-30. A domain-validated certificate confirms only control of the domain, not the operator's identity.

### What to Verify Next

Before any wallet is connected or any funds are committed, the site's claimed connection to the named brand should be tested through that brand's own official channels, reached independently rather than through any link on this page. The user should also ask the operator, through a separately sourced route, for the legal entity behind the service, the fee and payout terms for votes, and any regulatory standing it claims. Official support and contact channels should be established the same way. Any token whose contract address is loaded here should be checked on its own block explorer, independently of the page's displayed details. Evidence:

- Homepage: the SOL amounts in the live feed have no stated purpose, which is why the fee and payout terms need written confirmation.
- Homepage: the "Support" and "Sign up or Sign in" entries give no destination that could be assessed in this analysis.
- Homepage: the token detail panel loads data from a pasted contract address, so those details are only as reliable as the address supplied.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries a **critical trust posture** and is classed as a high-risk crypto token page. External reputation sources have flagged it, and its behaviour and content corroborate that flag. Neither technical hygiene nor the page's polished appearance offsets this. Legitimacy cannot be inferred from anything observed, and the real-world operator is unidentified.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all four resolved addresses are Cloudflare edge servers, so the true hosting origin is not visible. The certificate is valid and issued by a known authority. This is a mitigating factor only, since protective infrastructure is available to any customer and does not indicate who operates the site or whether it is safe. The edge-only view also prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid swaps of content behind the edge. That is relevant given the cloaking behaviour already observed.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. Wallets should not be connected, no login or credentials should be entered, and no funds should be sent. Anyone who has already connected a wallet or signed anything here should revoke token approvals and consider moving assets to a fresh wallet. The page should also be reported to the brand it invokes and to the relevant platform abuse channels.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Page content
- The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`)
- The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG`)
- The review of the page content rated it moderate risk. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RISK_MED`)
- The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of bitvavo.fun.

- The request stayed on bitvavo.fun. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under Dynadot Inc. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-06-04. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2023-02-21. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Dynadot Inc |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3036::6815:442a |
| Name servers | ariadne.ns.cloudflare.com, ignacio.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-30 |
| Domain age | 0.38 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-06-04 |
| Archive first seen | 2023-02-21 |
| Archive snapshots | 3 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about bitvavo.fun at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [pumprewards.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pumprewards.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [bullseyesonsol.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bullseyesonsol.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [token-reward.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/token-reward.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [blackbullonsol.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blackbullonsol.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [early-drop.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/early-drop.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 17/100)
- [memecoin-drop.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/memecoin-drop.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [cryptomus.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cryptomus.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [meme-giveaway.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/meme-giveaway.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [trustsend20.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trustsend20.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [fastswap.fr](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fastswap.fr), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitvavo.fun) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitvavo.fun · assessed 2026-10-20.*