---
title: "Is blackpantherfi.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "blackpantherfi.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is Pages a scam? blackpantherfi.pages.dev trust score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/blackpantherfi.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-29
---

# Is Pages a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment of blackpantherfi.pages.dev: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** blackpantherfi.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-29 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 10 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 1.9 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (7 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the blackpantherfi.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/blackpantherfi.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What blackpantherfi.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-29. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

BlackPantherFi is a website served from a free, shared subdomain on a developer-hosting platform. Its name suggests a finance-themed project. When the site was analysed, the homepage presented only a protective interstitial warning of suspected phishing, not a normal product or marketing page. Its apparent purpose is therefore unconfirmed: no products, yields, leverage figures or business claims were observable. The site's reputation record shows it is actively flagged by security vendors.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and decisive. Several independent security engines currently classify the site as malicious, and the site is **blacklisted** by external threat-intelligence sources. Those sources include a number of well-regarded security vendors, and the detection level was high enough on its own to trigger a protective override of the overall assessment. The page served to the analysis browser was an interstitial warning of suspected phishing. This reinforces the reputational finding, and a prior phishing association is also recorded for the domain. No conflicting legal entities or confirmed brand impersonation were identified. The risk stems from the active malicious listing, not from identity conflict. Behavioural testing found no wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer behaviour, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or credential posts to outside parties. Even so, the surface showed heavy third-party request traffic, repeated script errors and very large page-structure changes after interaction. Those traits can accompany content swapping or staged payload delivery, so the absence of a drainer in these runs does not offset the listing. The ownership of the site is opaque, which means no accountable operator can be tied to the activity. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page captured was a suspected-phishing interstitial, not site content, and the site is flagged malicious by ten security engines, with one more rating it suspicious.
- Domain provenance: registered about 1.9 years ago, with 7 archive snapshots spanning 2024–2026 (3 years tracked), which is a thin and young history.
- Homepage behaviour: about 96% of observed external-activity share went to third parties, with 14 console errors and roughly 1,500 page mutations after interaction.
- Homepage behaviour: no wallet-provider detection, clipboard writes or external password forms were observed in three successful runs.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No licence, registration or regulator match is evidenced for this site, and no third-party broker-reputation record corresponds to it. Governance and ownership are opaque: the operator cannot be tied to a real-world entity, and the registration record is incomplete. The site is not regulated by a verified third party, and its on-site disclosures could not be assessed because the visible page was a warning interstitial. These are verification gaps, not scam evidence on their own. In this case they sit alongside confirmed malicious listings and therefore weigh more heavily. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page captured carried no legal, licensing or corporate-registration information.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), which is shared infrastructure that says nothing about the operator.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-12-25. Domain validation proves control of the hostname only, not who operates it.
- Reputation: no match in the broker-reputation dataset, so no external regulatory or complaint context exists.

### What to Verify Next

Any engagement with this site should be preceded by a check of the site's current standing with the reputation services that flagged it. If the owner is a legitimate project, it is most likely a case for remediation and delisting. Any claimed firm identity should be confirmed independently through an official regulator registry and through contact details obtained from an offline or otherwise trusted route, not from the site. Where the site later displays real content, any financial product claims, returns or leverage figures should be tested against registry records before reliance. Evidence:

- Homepage: no identifiable operator or registration number was available to check against a registry.
- Domain: the site sits on a shared platform subdomain, so the hostname gives no ownership attribution.
- Reputation: active detections remain current, so the site's standing should be rechecked before any further use.

### Summary Verdict

The site is assessed as high risk. Active malicious listings and a suspected-phishing warning dominate every other signal, and neither the valid certificate nor the clean behavioural runs outweigh them. The operator cannot be identified, so no legitimacy case can be built.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is fronted by a mainstream CDN and WAF, and all four observed addresses are edge servers; the origin server is not visible. This is a recognised, reputable platform with a valid certificate, and it mitigates some technical risk. It cannot offset the reputation findings. It also prevents independent verification of where the content is actually hosted.


### Closing Assessment

Treat the site as unsafe for any login, credential entry, wallet connection or payment, and do not download anything from it. Any contact should be limited to passive viewing, if it is needed at all.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-29 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of blackpantherfi.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on blackpantherfi.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-12-18. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f49 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-25 |
| Domain age | 1.86 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-12-18 |
| Archive snapshots | 7 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 10 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about blackpantherfi.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [flashusdtbuysell.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flashusdtbuysell.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 20/100)
- [bckr-7s3.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bckr-7s3.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 10/100)
- [prosynntech.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/prosynntech.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [migrates-singularity-ai.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/migrates-singularity-ai.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [bsssb.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bsssb.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [app-prvxnet.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/app-prvxnet.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [nx8kf.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nx8kf.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [palm-81o.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/palm-81o.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [phillipsorthopedic.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/phillipsorthopedic.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [almadepedra.com.br](https://trustsniffer.com/report/almadepedra.com.br), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 28, 2026: 45 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-28)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blackpantherfi.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/blackpantherfi.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-29.*