--- title: "Is blockdagtoken.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "blockdagtoken.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is blockdagtoken.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100" trust_score: 5 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockdagtoken.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is blockdagtoken.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** blockdagtoken.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 14 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 2.4 years old (Registered history) | Clear | | Web archive | Archived since 2024 (20 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the blockdagtoken.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/blockdagtoken.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What blockdagtoken.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2024. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This is a web page published on a shared Cloudflare Pages subdomain, and its hostname presents it as a "BlockDAG token" property. That naming suggests a cryptocurrency token promotion or presale. The content captured from the page was only a short security interstitial, not a full storefront, so the site's own products, yields and claims could not be read. Its apparent purpose, judging by the name alone, is to draw visitors toward a crypto-asset offering. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and decisive. Several major security vendors independently classify the site as malicious, and an external blacklist record exists for it. The hosting platform's own security layer replaced the homepage with a warning page titled "suspected phishing", and the capture returned an access-denied response. These signals converge on one conclusion: the site is a **confirmed blacklisted destination with a phishing association**. Its crypto-token naming fits a pattern that fraud operators commonly use to lure visitors toward wallet-connection or payment flows. No conflicting legal identities were found, and the site was not found to impersonate a specific named brand. The risk here comes from the threat listings, not from identity conflicts. Behavioral testing found no wallet-connection attempts, wallet-drainer routines, clipboard manipulation or hidden credential forms. That absence does not offset the external detections, because the page content was gated and not fully observable. The same testing showed that nearly all page activity went to external resources, with repeated script errors across sessions. This is consistent with a page that loads most of its behavior from elsewhere. Evidence: - Homepage: the capture was replaced by a platform interstitial titled "Suspected Phishing", returned with an access-denied status, and exposed only a very short block of text. - Reputation checks: multiple tier-one security vendors flag the domain as malicious, and one further engine marks it suspicious. An external blacklist record exists. - Archive record: 20 snapshots spanning 2024–2025 (2 years tracked), with the first capture in May 2024. The domain is about 2.4 years old and the archive reaches back only to that point. - Behavioral sandbox: 18 external XHR calls and 4 external POST requests across 3 runs, 16 console errors, and no wallet or form-hijack activity. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured page exposed no legal, terms, privacy or about content, so no licensing status, corporate registration or named operating entity can be assessed from the site. Operator ownership is opaque. This is an administrative limitation and is not treated as an identity contradiction. Nothing on the site supports a claim of regulated status, and no third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists for the name. Any crypto-asset activity tied to this hostname should therefore be treated as unregulated and unverified. The reputational risk stems from the threat detections described above, not from the absence of disclosures. Evidence: - Legal and identity pages: none were retrievable, and the only content captured was the security interstitial. - Broker intelligence: no match for the site name in the reputational dataset, which is a contextual signal and not a licensing verdict. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-03. This confirms an encrypted connection and says nothing about operator identity. ### What to Verify Next Anyone who encounters this link should not follow its calls to action. They should confirm whether the "BlockDAG" project has an official web presence by consulting independent, long-standing sources such as established exchange listings or the project's published documentation, and compare that hostname with this one. Because this address sits on a free-form shared hosting subdomain, it should be checked against the project's official channels before any trust is extended. If any token sale, presale or investment offer is associated with the site, the offering entity's authorization should be confirmed with the relevant financial regulator's public register through an independent route. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed from sources other than this site. Evidence: - Hostname: the site runs on a shared platform subdomain, and the project name appears only within the subdomain label. - Homepage: no operator name, licence reference or official-channel disclosure was visible in the captured content. - Reputation checks: the existing malicious classifications mean a clean result cannot be assumed until independently cleared. ### Summary Verdict The site sits in a critical-risk posture. Active threat-intelligence detections and a phishing association outweigh every neutral or positive technical attribute observed. The available evidence indicates a destination that is dangerous for any sensitive interaction, and there is no basis for treating it as an established or legitimate entity. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address belongs to the provider's edge network. The origin server was not observable. The Cloudflare bot-protection layer is active. This is a mitigating factor only, because it indicates a mainstream hosting platform. It does not validate the site, and it cannot offset the external threat detections. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of the true hosting origin. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial transaction, and nothing should be downloaded from it. If it must be viewed at all, the visit should be read-only, from an isolated or protected environment. Anyone who has already interacted with it should rotate affected credentials and review any wallet approvals. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 Governance - A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`) ### 02 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of blockdagtoken.pages.dev. - The request stayed on blockdagtoken.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-05-29. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f46 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-03 | | Domain age | 2.41 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2024-05-29 | | Archive snapshots | 20 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 14 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about blockdagtoken.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [moonedge-earn.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/moonedge-earn.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [fixprotocol.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fixprotocol.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 15/100) - [smartfix-app.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/smartfix-app.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [nc4qsnh.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nc4qsnh.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 18/100) - [base-pay-app-ss.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/base-pay-app-ss.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [typusfinance.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/typusfinance.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 9/100) - [promptrectifyapprove.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/promptrectifyapprove.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [act1vedapps-4nt.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/act1vedapps-4nt.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 22/100) - [naruflix.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/naruflix.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [apeterminal-reg-web3.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/apeterminal-reg-web3.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockdagtoken.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockdagtoken.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*