---
title: "Is blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev a Scam? Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-29
---

# Is blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-29 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 9 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.4 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (16 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-29. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page site titled "Guildhall", served from a free subdomain on a developer page-hosting platform. It presents a short block of text content with no clearly identified operator, and its commercial purpose or business model cannot be determined from the captured material. The page does generate heavy background traffic to third-party destinations.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The decisive finding is that the domain is **currently flagged as malicious by multiple independent security sources**, including several of the best-known commercial security vendors. This is a confirmed blacklist condition, and it is the main reason for the elevated-risk posture. The analysis did not establish brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities, and it did not show wallet-drainer or clipboard-hijack behaviour. That absence does not offset the external listings. Observed behaviour adds to the concern. During sandbox visits the page made a very large number of external background requests, issued several external data submissions, and reached a few destinations outside the commonly trusted set. A page with this little visible content has no evident reason for that volume of third-party communication. The page also logged repeated script errors, which points to an unstable or hastily assembled build. The domain is a young subdomain on a shared hosting platform, so anyone with a free account could create it. That makes it easy to launch and abandon, and it gives the domain no standalone reputation. Evidence:

- Homepage and domain-level reputation: multiple security vendors, including leading names, currently classify the domain as malicious, and an external blacklist entry is confirmed.
- Homepage sandbox behaviour: 75 external background requests and 9 external submissions across three runs. About two-thirds of observed activity went to external destinations, and three destinations were outside the commonly trusted set.
- Homepage rendering: 11 console errors were recorded. No hidden forms, cloaking, wallet-connection prompts or clipboard writes were observed.
- Domain provenance: first archived in June 2024, with 16 archive snapshots spanning 2024–2025 (about 2 years tracked) and a domain age of roughly 2.4 years.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page names no operating company and cites no licence, registration number or legal address. It has no terms, privacy or about pages, so the site's governance and ownership remain opaque. This is a disclosure gap, not evidence of a scam. The real-world operator has not been independently connected to the site, so none of the on-site presentation can be treated as established identity. No third-party broker or regulatory-database entry was matched. The transport-layer facts are routine and give no assurance about the operator. The certificate is a basic domain-validated type and shows only control of the domain, not the identity of the organisation behind it. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator name, licence, registration number or jurisdiction is disclosed.
- Site structure: no legal or policy pages were found among the captured pages.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-08 (about 40 days remaining).
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (CLOUDFLARENET, Cloudflare, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction beyond viewing, the operator's real identity should be established through an independent route, such as the claimed organisation's official channels found outside this site. Anyone who reached the site through a link, advertisement or message should trace how they got there and confirm that the sender is genuine. The security listings should be re-checked with the flagging vendors, and a listing that has been removed or reclassified would materially change this assessment. If the site claims to offer a financial or custodial service, the relevant licensing registry should be consulted directly. Evidence:

- Domain-level reputation: the current malicious classifications should be re-queried directly with the listing vendors.
- Homepage: it provides no verifiable operator, so identity must be sourced from outside the site.
- Referral path: the originating link or message that led to the site should be authenticated independently.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated-risk posture, driven by confirmed adverse external reputation and reinforced by unusual behavioural activity and an unidentified operator. Its technical hygiene is ordinary and does not change that conclusion. Read-only viewing is the only use consistent with the evidence.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are edge servers, so the origin host could not be observed independently. The valid certificate and reputable network provider are mitigating factors only. They cannot offset the reputation findings, and edge-only visibility also means the underlying content could be changed rapidly without any change in hosting signals.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as unsafe for any login, credential entry, wallet interaction or payment until the external listings are cleared and the operator is independently identified. If the page must be opened, it should be opened only in an isolated, non-privileged environment, and nothing should be downloaded from it.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-29 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-06-11. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2c49 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-08 |
| Domain age | 2.38 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-06-11 |
| Archive snapshots | 16 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 9 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [api-polkastarter.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/api-polkastarter.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [voting-mefai-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/voting-mefai-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [solspin-8dn.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solspin-8dn.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [sale-creator-bid.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sale-creator-bid.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 22/100)
- [unich-quests-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/unich-quests-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [innovateprotoclls.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/innovateprotoclls.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [matchaxyz-email-promo.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/matchaxyz-email-promo.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 9/100)
- [telcoins-bank-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/telcoins-bank-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [dexscreenervotelive.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dexscreenervotelive.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [seasons-papertrade.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/seasons-papertrade.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 13/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockguildmiddleware.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-29.*