---
title: "Is blockswalletschain.web.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "blockswalletschain.web.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is blockswalletschain.web.app a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockswalletschain.web.app
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is blockswalletschain.web.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** blockswalletschain.web.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 3% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR4) | Noted |
| Hosted by | FASTLY (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the blockswalletschain.web.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/blockswalletschain.web.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What blockswalletschain.web.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page, wallet-themed property on a shared web.app hosting subdomain. Its name implies a blockchain wallet or chain service. The captured homepage carries only a generic "Welcome to our website" title and a short block of text, with no distinctive product description. Its apparent purpose is therefore unclear. The page shows no named operator, and nothing on it ties it to a recognisable brand or service.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The assessment is cautionary. **A confirmed blacklist listing and multiple malicious detections from security vendors, including a tier-one vendor, currently apply to this site.** These are the decisive findings. The sources do not specify the nature of the detections, so the listing cannot be tied to a particular attack type. A wallet-themed name on a free, shared hosting subdomain with a placeholder-style homepage matches a pattern commonly used to stage wallet-related lures. That is an inference from the name and pattern, not a confirmed finding. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed. The listing alone carries the elevated risk. Four abuse reports were also logged against a network address shared by the hosting provider. They are not specific to this site and carry little weight on their own. Automated browsing found no wallet-connection prompts, no wallet-draining behaviour, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms, and no credential submission to external hosts. This does not offset the listing, because malicious content can be swapped in after a clean observation. Evidence:

- Homepage: the generic title and placeholder-style text give no product, operator, or service description.
- Reputation: several security engines flagged the domain as malicious or suspicious, and a tier-one vendor was among them. The site is currently on a blacklist.
- Behavioural testing, three successful sessions: no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack, hidden-form, or cloaking behaviour. The pages produced about a thousand DOM mutations after interaction and six console errors.
- Network reputation: four abuse reports concern a shared provider address. This signal is soft and not specific to the site.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured homepage names no legal entity, registration number, licence, regulator, or jurisdiction. It also gives no terms, privacy, or risk disclosures. Independent identity verification of the site's operator was not achieved. The site's apparent wallet or chain focus would normally call for such disclosures. No third-party broker or regulatory record was matched, so there is no external reputational or licensing context to weigh. The site's lack of any identifying disclosures is a verification gap. It is not proof of wrongdoing by itself, but it compounds the reputation findings and removes any mitigating context. Evidence:

- Homepage: no named operator, licence, or jurisdiction appears in the captured content.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is issued by WR4 at domain-validation level only and is valid to 2026-12-22. A certificate of this type confirms control of the domain, not the operator's identity.
- Hosting: served from AS54113 (Fastly, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, confirm through the official channels of the wallet or blockchain brand this site appears to evoke that the site is actually theirs. Any claimed operator should be checked against an independent corporate or financial-services registry. The domain should also be re-checked against threat-intelligence listings. A clean result there would be needed before any reassessment, and a site that appears to have been cleaned would still need its operator identified. No wallet should be connected, no seed phrase entered, and nothing downloaded in the meantime. Any official support or contact channel the site cites should be confirmed through a separate, independent route. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator is named, so brand ownership must be confirmed externally.
- Reputation: the current blacklist listing is the main condition that would have to clear before any reassessment.
- Behavioural testing: the page's strong post-interaction changes mean a clean snapshot cannot be assumed to represent later content.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries a **critical, high-risk trust posture**. Active blacklisting and multiple malicious detections outweigh its technically sound transport security and the absence of overtly malicious behaviour in testing. Its operator remains unidentified, and no legitimacy can be inferred from the evidence.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind the Fastly CDN, and all observed addresses are edge nodes. The origin server was not visible, which limits independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content swaps. The CDN's reputable standing is a mitigating factor for availability and delivery only. It does not offset the reputation findings and says nothing about the legitimacy of the operator.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. Account login, credential or seed-phrase entry, wallet connection, and any financial interaction should be avoided until the site's threat listings are cleared and its operator is independently identified.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`)
- Many of the responses the page received looked generated rather than served normally. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_SYNTHETIC_RESPONSES_HIGH`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2620:0:890::100 (Google LLC, Content Delivery Network), 3% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of blockswalletschain.web.app.

- The request stayed on blockswalletschain.web.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on FASTLY, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2620:0:890::100 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (fastly) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 2 |
| Edge IP addresses | 2 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR4 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-22 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 3% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about blockswalletschain.web.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [saturnholders.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/saturnholders.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [saturnreward.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/saturnreward.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-sbz.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-sbz.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [saturn-rewards.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/saturn-rewards.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-uvm.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-uvm.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [flamengotoken.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flamengotoken.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [programmable-v4.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/programmable-v4.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-zhq.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-zhq.netlify.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [xautstaking.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xautstaking.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 15/100)
- [worldlibertyfinanceal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/worldlibertyfinanceal.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockswalletschain.web.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockswalletschain.web.app · assessed 2026-10-27.*