--- title: "Is boaclaim.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 18/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "boaclaim.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is boaclaim.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 18/100" trust_score: 18 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/boaclaim.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is boaclaim.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 18/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 18/100.** boaclaim.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted | | Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the boaclaim.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/boaclaim.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What boaclaim.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview This website is a single-page site published on a free subdomain of a public web-hosting platform. Its page title presents it under the name "BOSagora", and the domain name itself uses the word "claim". The homepage returned a short text page with no further identifiable content. Its apparent purpose is to present a claim-style or brand-themed landing page tied to a blockchain-related name. The capture shows no verified operator, product, or business model. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This is a high-risk assessment with confirmed contradictory signals. The domain is **blacklisted**: multiple independent reputation sources flag it, with two engines returning malicious verdicts and two more returning suspicious ones. A broader external blacklist signal corroborates this. Two further factors raise the concern. The hostname pairs a claim-style keyword with a well-known blockchain brand name, a pattern typical of reward or token-claim lures. It also sits on a free, shared hosting subdomain, so the operator did not register a standalone domain. No explicit brand-impersonation or identity-conflict finding was confirmed, and the content analysis could not tie the site to any legitimate brand, so it cannot be treated as the brand's official property. Behavioral testing found no wallet-connection prompts, wallet-drainer activity, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or page cloaking. However, the page sent seven outbound POST requests, three of them to destinations outside the recognized-service set. That is a data-egress pattern worth caution on a site that already carries reputation flags. The page also made dozens of external background requests. Evidence: - Homepage: the page title presents the site as "BOSagora" while the hostname is a free-platform subdomain containing "claim", with no verifiable link to the named brand. - Reputation checks: two malicious and two suspicious detections, plus a corroborating external blacklist flag. - Behavioral sandbox (three successful runs): 51 external XHR/fetch requests and 7 external POSTs, 3 of them to non-whitelisted destinations. - Behavioral sandbox: no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack, hidden-form, or cloaking behavior detected. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured homepage discloses no company name, licence, registration number, or legal pages, and no real-world operator can be independently connected to it. The content analysis could not verify identity, so no claim of legitimacy can rest on the site's own presentation. No third-party broker or regulator record matched this site. The absence of one is not a finding in itself, but it leaves nothing that offsets the reputation flags. Registration details are incomplete, which fits the platform-subdomain model and is an ownership-opacity point rather than an identity contradiction. A valid certificate establishes only encrypted transport, not who operates the site. Evidence: - Homepage: no operator name, licensing statement, or terms/privacy disclosures were found in the captured content. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE2 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-16. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). ### What to Verify Next Before any interaction, confirm through the official channels of the brand the name evokes (its verified website and announcements, reached independently, not via this page) whether any claim or reward program at this address exists. Treat the address as unrelated to that brand until the brand confirms it. Do not connect a wallet or enter credentials, seed phrases, or payment details. Re-check the address against current threat-intelligence listings before any further engagement. Confirm the official support and contact channels through an independent route. Evidence: - Homepage: the brand-style title and claim-style hostname are the only identity cues, and neither can be validated from the site. - Behavioral sandbox: outbound POSTs to unrecognized destinations indicate data may leave the visitor's browser to third parties. - Reputation checks: current detections make an independent brand confirmation essential before any engagement. ### Summary Verdict The available evidence supports a clearly cautionary posture. Confirmed reputation detections and the absence of any verifiable operator or brand link outweigh the site's technically sound transport setup. Only passive viewing is consistent with the findings. Login, credential entry, and any financial interaction fall into the unsafe category. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and web-application firewall. All four observed addresses are CDN edge servers, and the origin host could not be seen. That is typical of shielded deployments and is mitigating for network-level exposure only. It also prevents independent verification of the actual hosting and allows content to change quickly behind a stable address. This protection does not offset the reputation detections or establish the site's legitimacy. ### Closing Assessment Treat the site as unsafe for any transactional or credential-based use. Limit contact to passive viewing, if any, and use the legitimate brand's independently confirmed channels for any real claim or program. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) - The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of boaclaim.pages.dev. - The request stayed on boaclaim.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2ede | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YE2 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-16 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about boaclaim.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [midenclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/midenclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [apes-verification.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/apes-verification.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 19/100) - [giveaway-piggycoincom.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/giveaway-piggycoincom.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [uniswap-launchpads.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-launchpads.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [etfswappresales.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/etfswappresales.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100) - [pimeru.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pimeru.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [hive-keychain.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hive-keychain.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [p1inch.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/p1inch.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [jptcheckstatus-ui.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jptcheckstatus-ui.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [drop-opportunity.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/drop-opportunity.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27) - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/boaclaim.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/boaclaim.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*