--- title: "Is btrace-aml.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 21/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "btrace-aml.vercel.app" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is btrace-aml.vercel.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 21/100" trust_score: 21 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/btrace-aml.vercel.app assessed: 2026-10-26 --- # Is btrace-aml.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 21/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 21/100.** btrace-aml.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 84 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted | | Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the btrace-aml.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/btrace-aml.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png) _What btrace-aml.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview BTrace AML presents itself as a blockchain anti-money-laundering checker. Its homepage title advertises risk screening across the TRON, EVM, Solana, SUI and XRP ecosystems. It runs as a single-page web application on a shared hosting-platform subdomain rather than a standalone branded domain. Its apparent purpose is to let visitors screen crypto wallet addresses or transactions for illicit-fund exposure. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk Contradictory signals are present and drive the cautionary posture of this report. Multiple independent threat-intelligence engines flag the site: two classify it as malicious and one as suspicious, and an external blacklist listing corroborates this. This is a **confirmed blacklisting-level reputational contradiction**, not a soft signal. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed. The elevated risk rests on the external detections. The site's own content provides no counter-evidence that would offset them. Behavioural testing of the homepage found 12 outbound background requests and 12 outbound POST submissions to third-party destinations, three of which go to hosts outside the recognised-service set. Nearly all of the page's request traffic is directed off-site. For a tool that invites visitors to submit wallet addresses or transaction identifiers, that is a meaningful data-leakage concern. In the test sessions the page did not trigger wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, credential forms posting off-site, or content cloaking. Those absences narrow the observed exposure but do not neutralise the external detections. A separate set of abuse reports exists against the shared address the site resolves to. They concern the hosting platform's multi-tenant infrastructure, not this site specifically, and were discounted. Evidence: - Homepage: two malicious and one suspicious verdict from the multi-engine reputation scan, plus an external blacklist hit. - Homepage behavioural run: external requests make up the large majority of traffic, with three non-recognised external POST destinations. - Hosting address: 84 abuse reports, attributed to shared platform infrastructure and discounted, with no site-specific attribution. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site claims to provide AML risk screening, a function users may associate with compliance-grade reliability. Nothing in the captured evidence ties it to a real-world operator, registered company or regulated entity, so any suggestion of institutional backing is unsupported. Third-party broker-reputation data returned no match. That is neutral context and not a regulatory finding. The site's valid TLS certificate shows only that traffic is encrypted. It says nothing about who runs the site or whether the screening results are reliable. Evidence: - Homepage: the AML-checker positioning and multi-chain screening claims are not accompanied by any verifiable operator or licensing attribution. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-11-27. - Network origin: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US). ### What to Verify Next Before any engagement, establish through independent channels who operates BTrace AML. This means checking for a registered company, a named team, and a published and independently reachable support channel. Any claim of regulatory authorisation or compliance certification should be confirmed directly with the relevant registry, not through the site. The outbound data flows to the three unrecognised third-party destinations should be inspected in a controlled environment to establish what user-supplied wallet or transaction data is shared. The current reputation listings should be rechecked after the operator has had the opportunity to respond or remediate. Evidence: - Homepage: the screening service describes itself as an AML checker but names no accountable operator. - Behavioural run: three non-recognised external POST destinations remain unexplained. ### Summary Verdict The site is assessed as high risk. Confirmed external threat detections outweigh its technically sound baseline, and its operator identity is not independently established. The site's behaviour does not show active credential theft or wallet-draining mechanics. The reputation findings nonetheless dominate the assessment, and the site cannot be treated as trustworthy for sensitive interaction. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is hosted on a major cloud-backed CDN/WAF platform, and all six observed addresses are edge nodes. This is a mitigating factor only. The origin server was not observable, so the hosting cannot be independently verified, and content could be changed quickly behind the edge layer. Platform protection cannot offset the reputation findings above. ### Closing Assessment Limit use to read-only browsing. Do not log in, submit credentials, enter wallet addresses or transaction data of value, or make any payment until the operator is independently identified and the threat listings are cleared. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) - The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 84 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.3 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of btrace-aml.vercel.app. - The request stayed on btrace-aml.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 64.29.17.3 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected | | Resolved IP addresses | 6 | | Edge IP addresses | 6 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WR1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 84 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about btrace-aml.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [polksvo.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/polksvo.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [mc-modhub.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mc-modhub.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [fastingegoogru.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fastingegoogru.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [dttjjkkllzbvesjzndtp.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dttjjkkllzbvesjzndtp.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [check-variational-vote.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/check-variational-vote.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [hachikoinufinance.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hachikoinufinance.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [arbitrumquest.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/arbitrumquest.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [jupiter-launchpad.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jupiter-launchpad.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100) - [worldlibertys-financials.web.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/worldlibertys-financials.web.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [axiomdeveloperrpc.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/axiomdeveloperrpc.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/btrace-aml.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/btrace-aml.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-26.*