---
title: "Is claim-stargrace.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "claim-stargrace.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is claim-stargrace.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-stargrace.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is claim-stargrace.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** claim-stargrace.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 10 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the claim-stargrace.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/claim-stargrace.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What claim-stargrace.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page destination on a free shared-hosting subdomain of a developer deployment platform. Its name, "claim-stargrace", points to a reward- or token-claim offering. When analysed, the homepage returned only a very short block of text. In place of the site's own content, a security-challenge page labelled as a suspected-phishing warning was served. The site's apparent purpose is therefore a claim or giveaway-style landing page of unconfirmed business model, and its real content was not retrievable.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This site presents **confirmed adverse reputation signals**. Multiple independent security engines classify it as malicious. Several of these are tier-one vendors, and the detection volume alone places the site on a blacklist. The homepage itself, when fetched, returned an access-denied response carrying a platform-issued "suspected phishing" warning. That is consistent with the external detections and indicates the hosting platform's own abuse controls have flagged the deployment. The name "claim-stargrace" follows a pattern commonly used in reward-claim lures, which are typically built to coax visitors into connecting wallets, entering credentials, or paying "fees" to release a payout. The captured content was too sparse to show which mechanism, if any, this site uses, so that is an inference from naming and reputation rather than an observed fact. In the automated browsing sessions, no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or credential posts to external destinations were observed. Network calls to third-party destinations were frequent but all matched known benign services, and the page produced a notable number of script errors. These observations slightly temper the picture but do not offset the confirmed blacklist status. No conflicting legal identities were found, because no identity content was captured. Evidence:

- Homepage: access was refused with a bot-challenge response, and the page title read as a suspected-phishing warning.
- Reputation: ten security engines rated the domain malicious and one rated it suspicious, including three major tier-one vendors, so a critical blacklist threshold was reached.
- Behavioural sessions (3 of 3 completed): no wallet-connect, clipboard-write, hidden-form or external password-form activity. Seventeen console errors and 22 third-party XHR/fetch calls were recorded, none to non-whitelisted destinations.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No licensing, registration number, company name, or legal terms could be assessed, because the only content retrieved was the platform challenge page rather than any legal or about page. No third-party broker or regulator record matches this site, and no regulated-entity status is established. The site's real-world operator therefore remains unconnected to any identifiable person or organisation. Transport security is valid but is only a domain-validated certificate. It confirms an encrypted connection and says nothing about who runs the site or whether it is honest. Evidence:

- Technical hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), registry ARIN.
- TLS: certificate issued by WE1, domain-validated (DV), valid to 2027-01-05.
- Broker and regulatory databases: no match for this domain or name, so no regulatory standing is established.

### What to Verify Next

Any prospective interaction should begin with the party that referred the visitor to this address. The invitation, message, or advertisement should be traced back to the brand it claims to represent through that brand's officially published channels, reached independently of any link supplied. A brand's own verified website should be checked for any genuine "claim" programme before any interaction with this domain. If the site is meant to represent a known project or company, the project's official announcement channels should confirm or deny it. Suspected abuse of the shared-hosting subdomain can be reported to the hosting platform's abuse desk and to the brand being referenced. Evidence:

- Homepage: the platform's own suspected-phishing interstitial replaced the site content, so no on-site claim could be validated.
- Domain naming: the claim-oriented name sits under a shared-hosting parent domain rather than a dedicated, brand-owned domain.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk and clearly cautionary. External security detections are decisive, and no legitimacy evidence, however favourable, can offset them. Technical hygiene such as valid encryption and a mainstream hosting network is routine on malicious sites. It does not indicate trustworthiness, and the operator's identity is entirely unestablished. The site is suitable for read-only observation at most.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and web-application firewall. All four observed addresses are Cloudflare edge servers, and the origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only, since it indicates the domain is not hosted on bulletproof or anonymous infrastructure. It also prevents independent confirmation of where the content is actually served from. Edge-only visibility can mask rapid content swaps, so what is served may change without notice. Protective infrastructure cannot counter the reputation risk established by the external detections.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection, or any payment or financial transaction. Nothing should be downloaded from it. Anyone who has already interacted with it should change any exposed passwords, revoke any wallet approvals granted, and monitor their financial accounts.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of claim-stargrace.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on claim-stargrace.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2ee6 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-05 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 10 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about claim-stargrace.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [oortech.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/oortech.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [moonbeam-portal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/moonbeam-portal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100)
- [hive-migration.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hive-migration.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [dashboard-gpu-net-dasboard-gpoints.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dashboard-gpu-net-dasboard-gpoints.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [ghost-wallet.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ghost-wallet.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [rewards-paal-ai-6da.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rewards-paal-ai-6da.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [mantra-zone.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mantra-zone.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [fgfggreerferf.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fgfggreerferf.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 15/100)
- [9spay.in](https://trustsniffer.com/report/9spay.in), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100)
- [dbroker.com.ua](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dbroker.com.ua), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-stargrace.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-stargrace.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*