--- title: "Is claimslab.pro a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "claimslab.pro" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is claimslab.pro a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/claimslab.pro assessed: 2026-10-27 --- # Is claimslab.pro a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** claimslab.pro shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 18 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafe (Google) | Risk | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 2 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | | Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the claimslab.pro homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/claimslab.pro/screenshots/first.png) _What claimslab.pro served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Google, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. Claimslab.pro is a newly registered website whose homepage, titled "Claim | Lab", shows only a minimal landing page with very little text. The domain and title suggest a claims-related service, but the page does not set out what is offered, to whom, or how it earns revenue. Its apparent purpose therefore cannot be established from the site's own content. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This site carries a **confirmed blacklist** against it. A major browser safe-browsing service classifies it under its social-engineering category, the type of listing applied to phishing and deceptive-lure sites. A large cluster of independent security engines also flags the domain as malicious, and that cluster includes several tier-one vendors. The corroboration across independent sources is the decisive factor in this assessment. No conflicting legal-entity names and no impersonation of a specific named brand were observed. The risk comes from the reputational listings and the site's behaviour, not from a visible identity clash. A domain registered only weeks ago that is already listed for social engineering fits the common pattern of short-lived lure infrastructure. Behavioural testing of the homepage found no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, or content cloaking. It did record a heavy volume of background requests to third-party destinations, including data submissions to several destinations outside the expected set, and a very high number of script errors. For a page with almost no visible content, that outbound traffic is disproportionate. Because the page's purpose is unclear, there is no legitimate reason visible for it to send data to external parties. Evidence: - Homepage: flagged by a browser safe-browsing service under a social-engineering threat category, with a confirmed external blacklist match. - Homepage: a substantial group of security engines, including several tier-one vendors, rate the domain malicious or suspicious. - Homepage behavioural run: 12 external fetch/XHR requests and 6 external POST requests, 3 of them to non-whitelisted destinations, alongside 68 console errors across 3 successful runs. - Domain registration: registered 2026-08-15 (~0.2 years old), so the domain is only a few months old. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The homepage carries almost no text and gives no legal entity name, licensing statement, registration number, or terms of service. This is a real content gap on the site itself. A site that invites any claim submission or financial interaction would be expected to disclose all of these. Registrant details are also incomplete in the public registration record, which amounts to ownership opacity. That is an administrative limitation, not an identity contradiction, but together with the blank page it leaves no on-site basis for connecting the domain to a real organisation. No third-party regulatory or broker-reputation record matched the site, so there is no external licensing assertion to weigh. The absence of a license is not itself evidence of fraud, but here it sits alongside confirmed threat listings, so it offers no mitigation. Evidence: - Homepage: roughly two hundred characters of text, with no company name, licence, address, or policy pages. - Registration record: registrar is NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED; registered 2026-08-15, expiring 2027-08-15; registrant details incomplete. - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - Transport encryption: a domain-validated certificate issued by WE1, valid to 2027-01-13. This confirms only encrypted transport, not the operator's identity or intent. ### What to Verify Next No verification step should precede the avoidance of any interaction with the site. Anyone who encountered the domain through an email, message, or advertisement should treat that communication as suspect and contact the organisation it claimed to represent through an independently sourced official channel, never through links or contact details supplied by the message. If the site purports to be a claims, recovery, or financial service, its operator should be checked against the relevant national licensing or company registry using details obtained independently of the site. If the domain appears in organisational logs, mail filters, or browser histories, security teams should review whether users submitted any information to it. Submissions made via the page's data-posting behaviour should be treated as potentially exposed. Evidence: - Homepage: no named operator or registry number, so any registry check must start from independently sourced details. - Homepage behavioural run: outbound data submissions to unlisted destinations mean any information entered there may have reached third parties. - Threat listings: both the browser safe-browsing classification and the multi-engine detections remain current and should be rechecked for delisting before any reassessment. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high risk, and the available evidence does not support treating this domain as legitimate. Confirmed reputational listings from several independent sources, a very recent registration, and a content-free landing page together outweigh the technically valid security basics. Those basics are ordinary and easily obtained by throwaway domains, so they do not establish trustworthiness. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is served behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is a Cloudflare edge address. The origin server was not observable, so hosting cannot be independently verified, and this edge-only visibility can conceal rapid content changes behind the same domain. Such infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. It is a mainstream, reputable provider used by both legitimate and malicious sites, and it cannot offset the reputational risk documented above. ### Closing Assessment The domain should not be used for login, credential entry, personal-data submission, claim filing, or any payment. Even passive browsing carries unnecessary exposure. Any link to it received in unsolicited communication should be discarded and reported to the impersonated organisation or the relevant anti-phishing service. Reassessment is warranted only if the current threat listings are formally cleared and the operator publishes verifiable identity and licensing details. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`) - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) ### 04 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of claimslab.pro. - The request stayed on claimslab.pro. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-08-15. (Noted) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3033::6815:4723 | | Name servers | ophelia.ns.cloudflare.com, vicente.ns.cloudflare.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-13 | | Domain age | 0.20 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-08-15 | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 18 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 1 match | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about claimslab.pro at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [beradrome.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/beradrome.pro), another .pro site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [multichain-dapps.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/multichain-dapps.pro), another .pro site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [hashflow-dex.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hashflow-dex.pro), another .pro site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100) - [nabla-finance.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nabla-finance.pro), another .pro site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [gyroscope-protocol.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gyroscope-protocol.pro), another .pro site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [basebridge.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/basebridge.pro), another .pro site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 4/100) - [stratavaults.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stratavaults.pro), another .pro site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [verify-rainmakerapp.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/verify-rainmakerapp.pro), another .pro site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [get-solana.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/get-solana.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 11/100) - [refundyoursoll.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/refundyoursoll.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claimslab.pro) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/claimslab.pro · assessed 2026-10-27.*