---
title: "Is click-dt-20.vercel.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 35/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "click-dt-20.vercel.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is click-dt-20.vercel.app Safe? Warning Signs, Score 35/100"
trust_score: 35
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-dt-20.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is click-dt-20.vercel.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 35/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 35/100.** click-dt-20.vercel.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | The page displays only a 'Deployment Unavailable' message with a request identifier and no other content, so the site's purpose cannot be assessed. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 85 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the click-dt-20.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/click-dt-20.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What click-dt-20.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a bare-bones deployment placeholder on a shared application-hosting subdomain. The homepage shows only a "Deployment Unavailable" message and a request identifier. It has no products, pricing, forms, navigation, links or branding, so it has no discernible purpose or business model. It appears to be a deactivated or removed project rather than an operating business.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

One contradictory signal is present. The site is **blacklisted** by an external reputation source: one engine flagged it as malicious and another as suspicious. This is the decisive concern and the reason the assessment is cautionary. No phishing page, credential form, wallet-connection prompt or hidden form was observed, and the behavioral sandbox saw no outbound data submission or cloaking. The blacklist hit therefore rests on the listing itself, not on any harmful behavior seen on the page. The page analysis also noted that the hostname closely resembles the name of its own hosting platform. That is a lookalike signal only. It has not been confirmed as impersonation, and no conflicting legal identities exist because the page names no entity. The roughly 85 abuse reports tied to one of the site's edge addresses belong to a shared content-delivery address used by many unrelated tenants. They are discounted and should not be read as evidence against this site. Because a blacklist hit is confirmed and the page's content is dormant, the site could be repurposed at short notice. Content seen today therefore says little about content served later. Evidence:

- Homepage: a single "Deployment Unavailable" notice (92 characters of text), with no forms, links, or login elements.
- Homepage: the capture returned a 451 status code, and the page analysis flagged a strong lookalike similarity to the hosting platform's own domain.
- Sandbox, 3 of 3 runs successful: no external network activity, no cloaking, no wallet or clipboard behavior.
- Hosting infrastructure: the 85 abuse reports apply to the shared edge address 64.29.17.67, which is classed as content-delivery infrastructure with a zero confidence rating.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The page makes no licensing, registration or regulatory claim, and there are no legal, terms, privacy or about pages to assess. The page presents no operator identity, so the real-world operator is unverified. Nothing connects the site to a company or individual. No third-party broker or regulator record matched this domain, so there is no reputational context to weigh in either direction. The infrastructure facts that can be confirmed are modest. Transport encryption is valid, but it is only domain-validated, so it proves control of the hostname and says nothing about who operates it. The host is a major cloud network. Evidence:

- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US), registry ARIN.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (DV), valid to 2026-11-27 with 38 days remaining.
- Homepage: no license authority, license number, or registered company name appears.

### What to Verify Next

The only meaningful check is whether the project's owner is reachable through a channel that is independent of this page. Anyone who was directed here by a message, advertisement or QR code should go back to the source and ask the sender for the official address of the service. They should not rely on a link that leads to this subdomain. If the sender cannot name the service's registered operator, that should be treated as a warning sign in its own right. The listing should be re-checked before any later visit, because a placeholder on a blacklisted address can be replaced with different content without notice. Organizations that see this domain in their logs should record it as unverified and escalate it if it starts serving forms or downloads. Evidence:

- Homepage: the request identifier on the error page is the only artifact that could be quoted to the hosting platform's support team.
- Reputation: one malicious and one suspicious detection against the domain, with the others clean or undetected.
- Homepage: no contact page, support channel or operator name is published.

### Summary Verdict

The posture is clearly cautionary. The site is blacklisted, its operator is unverified, and its only visible content is a dormant error page that cannot support any trust conclusion. The absence of observed malicious behavior reduces the immediate technical risk but does not offset the external listing. The site cannot be treated as trustworthy for sensitive interaction.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The domain resolves to four addresses, all belonging to the hosting platform's CDN/WAF edge. None appears to be an origin server, and the true origin could not be observed. Edge-only visibility means the underlying host cannot be independently confirmed. It also means content can be swapped quickly behind the same stable address. The valid certificate, the mainstream cloud network and the clean behavioral run are mitigating factors only. They show the site is technically well-formed and do not offset the external reputation risk.


### Closing Assessment

Treat the site as read-only at most. Do not log in, enter credentials, make payments or share financial details here. Do not download anything from it. Confirm any related service through an independently sourced official channel before engaging.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Page content
- The page has very little readable content. (Page content `rule:PAGE_CONTENT_THIN`)
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 85 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.67 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of click-dt-20.vercel.app.

- The request stayed on click-dt-20.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.67 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 85 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about click-dt-20.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [jupiter-lite-gamma.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jupiter-lite-gamma.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 45/100)
- [app-web-5605-dj7lzt3so-carmonamarc2-3645s-projects.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/app-web-5605-dj7lzt3so-carmonamarc2-3645s-projects.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 31/100)
- [ondo-finances.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ondo-finances.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 49/100)
- [erc-trust-wallet.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/erc-trust-wallet.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 26/100)
- [web-node-7931-oye24wry1-deployment-access1.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/web-node-7931-oye24wry1-deployment-access1.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [bscscan-uxmq.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bscscan-uxmq.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [arcus-gate-vote.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/arcus-gate-vote.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [click-todt.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-todt.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 46/100)
- [stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stake-pendlefinance.pages.dev), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-dt-20.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-dt-20.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*