--- title: "Is cookie-ccw.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "cookie-ccw.pages.dev" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is Pages a scam? cookie-ccw.pages.dev trust score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/cookie-ccw.pages.dev assessed: 2026-10-29 --- # Is Pages a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment of cookie-ccw.pages.dev: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** cookie-ccw.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-29 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 14 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 1.9 years old (Registered history) | Clear | | Web archive | Archived since 2024 (4 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the cookie-ccw.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/cookie-ccw.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png) _What cookie-ccw.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-29. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2024. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This website is a project published on a free, shared subdomain of a developer hosting platform, under the name "cookie-ccw". When a visitor requests the homepage, no site content is served. The request meets a security interstitial from the content-delivery provider, titled as a suspected-phishing warning, and returns an access-denied response. The site's business purpose, products and operator cannot be established from anything it presents to a visitor. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This assessment is elevated and unambiguous. Multiple established security vendors independently flag the domain as malicious, and the aggregate detection volume exceeds the level at which the domain is treated as blacklisted. The domain is **blacklisted** by external threat-intelligence sources. The content-delivery layer itself replaces the homepage with a suspected-phishing warning. Archive history also carries a known-phishing marker. Together these point to a phishing or malicious-content role rather than a benign project. A shared, free subdomain also costs an operator almost nothing to abandon and recreate, which suits short-lived abuse campaigns. Browser-behaviour testing found no wallet-drainer activity, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms and no credential posts to third-party destinations. Those clean results do not offset the external detections. The page is also behind bot-protection gating, so sandbox runs may not have reached whatever content a real victim would be shown. No conflicting legal identities were observed, and no specific brand impersonation was confirmed. The risk rests on the threat detections. Evidence: - Homepage: the request returned an access-denied response with a page title reading "Suspected Phishing | Cloudflare" and only a short block of text. - Domain history: the domain is about 1.9 years old, with only 4 archive snapshots spanning 2024–2026 (3 years tracked) and no established continuity of content. - Browser-behaviour testing: 120 third-party XHR/fetch calls, 14 console errors and 1,508 DOM mutations after interaction across 3 runs. No wallet-connect, clipboard-write or hidden-form activity was detected. - Reputation: 14 vendors rated the domain malicious and 1 suspicious. The set included 3 top-tier security vendors, and the aggregate detection volume triggered a hard cap on the assessment. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No legal, terms, privacy, licensing or corporate-registration pages could be assessed, because the homepage was replaced by a warning interstitial. Nothing on the domain supports a claim of regulated status or an independently identifiable operator. No third-party broker or regulator dataset matched this domain, and the absence of a match is neutral. This note carries no weight against the site on its own. It only means no regulatory standing can be assumed for any financial, investment or custodial service the site might claim to offer. The valid TLS certificate shows that traffic is encrypted. It does not show who operates the site or that the content is safe. Evidence: - Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US) on a shared platform subdomain, not a standalone registered domain. - TLS: certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-22 (53 days remaining). DV validation confirms control of the domain, not the operator's identity. - Homepage: the response contained no legal-entity name, licence number or registration reference to evaluate. ### What to Verify Next Nobody should interact with this domain until an independent party establishes who operates it and why it is flagged. If the address arrived by message, advertisement or social-media post, the sender should be contacted through a previously known channel to establish how the link was obtained. If the site claims affiliation with a known company, the user should reach that company through its official site, typed in manually or taken from a trusted source, and ask whether it operates this address. The abuse team of the hosting platform can also be asked for the current status of the domain. The threat listings should be re-checked later, since a legitimate owner of a compromised site would be expected to have them cleared. Evidence: - Homepage: the suspected-phishing interstitial means the content cannot be inspected safely through normal browsing. - Reputation: the detections come from several independent sources, so a one-off false positive is unlikely, though the cause of the flags is unconfirmed. - Domain structure: a shared platform subdomain gives no independent signal of ownership, so ownership checks must go through the platform or the referring party. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high risk. Confirmed external threat detections decisively outweigh the modest technical hygiene signals the site shows. No independent evidence ties the site to a real-world business or person. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN/WAF, and every observed address belongs to its edge network. The origin server is not observable, so hosting cannot be independently verified, and an edge-only view can mask rapid content changes. The bot-protection gating is consistent with commodity edge security. This infrastructure is a mitigating factor only, and it cannot offset the reputational and threat-detection findings above. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection, payment or file download, and any link to it should be treated as untrusted. Anyone who has already entered credentials or financial details should change those credentials immediately and notify the relevant provider. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-29 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) - The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`) - The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`) - The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of cookie-ccw.pages.dev. - The request stayed on cookie-ccw.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-06-18. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f2b | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-22 | | Domain age | 1.87 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2024-06-18 | | Archive snapshots | 4 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 14 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about cookie-ccw.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [list-votesokx.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/list-votesokx.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 20/100) - [binanceairdrop-99l.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/binanceairdrop-99l.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [smartapp-verify.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/smartapp-verify.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [solvprotocolverification.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solvprotocolverification.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [wqerweq.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/wqerweq.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [flockerztokenclaim.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flockerztokenclaim.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [api-polkastarter.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/api-polkastarter.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [voting-mefai-net.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/voting-mefai-net.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100) - [pi-theta-five.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pi-theta-five.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [send-usd6.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-usd6.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 30, 2026: 72 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-30) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cookie-ccw.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/cookie-ccw.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-29.*