---
title: "Is cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app a Scam? Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 15 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 91 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a single-page site on a free hosting-platform subdomain named "cookingwithsoniaweb3". Its homepage is titled "Transfer Trust Wallet" and holds only a few dozen characters of visible text. It presents no products, pricing, company description or navigable content, and its apparent purpose is to prompt a cryptocurrency-wallet transfer interaction. No business model could be established from the captured content.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site carries a **confirmed adverse external reputation**. It is currently blacklisted: a substantial cluster of independent security engines classifies the domain as malicious, including several top-tier vendors. This is the decisive factor in the assessment. The page's own signals do not show the usual mechanics of a drainer or phishing kit. Automated behavioral testing across three successful runs found no outbound requests, wallet-connect or drainer activity, clipboard manipulation, hidden or credential-posting forms, or cloaking. This clean behavior does not offset the detections. A minimal page whose title invites a wallet transfer is a common front for credential and seed-phrase capture or for later content swaps. The hostname pairs a cooking-personality theme with "web3", which does not match the "Transfer Trust Wallet" function. The mismatch between the address and the stated function is a further reason for caution. No conflicting legal identities and no confirmed brand impersonation were observed. The many abuse reports logged against a shared hosting-provider address are discounted: they attach to infrastructure used by many unrelated sites, not to this domain specifically. Evidence:

- Homepage: titled "Transfer Trust Wallet" with only a very short block of text and no product, service or operator description.
- Reputation: multiple major security vendors flag the domain as malicious, and the reputation check on the domain returned an adverse result.
- Behavioral testing: three runs, all returning HTTP 200, with zero external network activity and no wallet-provider interaction detected.
- Hosting address: 91 abuse reports on a shared provider IP, attributed to shared infrastructure and discounted.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured homepage names no operating entity, registered company, licence or registration number. It also links no terms, privacy or legal pages, so the real-world operator cannot be tied to the site from its own content. Identity has not been independently verified, and the evidence supports no claim that the site is a legitimate or regulated financial service. If the page is intended to facilitate wallet or fund transfers, the absence of any disclosure is significant. In that setting it compounds the adverse reputation signal and is more than an administrative omission. No third-party broker-reputation record was matched to the site, so there is no external regulatory context to weigh. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, jurisdiction, licence or registration details, and no legal or policy pages in the captured content.
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by WR1 (domain-validated only), valid to 2026-11-27. Domain validation confirms control of the domain, not the operator's identity.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 – Amazon.com, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Anyone who reached this address through a message, advertisement or referral should confirm through an independent channel, such as a known phone number or an official website typed in manually, whether the sender actually operates it. The current status of the domain should be re-checked in public security-reputation lookups before any later reassessment, since the adverse detections may reflect either malicious operation or a compromise that has since been cleaned. If the page claims any payment, exchange or custody function, the operator's licence should be confirmed directly with the relevant financial regulator's public register. Official contact channels should be taken only from sources independent of this site. Evidence:

- Homepage: the title implies a wallet-transfer function, yet no named operator stands behind it, so the referral source is the only available link to an accountable party.
- Detections: the adverse classifications are current, so the status check should be repeated and should not rely on a cached result.
- Site content: the captured page offers no verifiable contact route, so none can be validated from the site itself.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk. The current threat-intelligence classifications are decisive, and neither the clean behavioral run nor the technically sound transport layer can offset them. The site's operator is unidentified and its stated function is unsubstantiated. It should be treated as a site presenting elevated risk to any visitor.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through the edge network of a large hosting platform running on Amazon cloud infrastructure. Six edge addresses were observed, and no origin server could be identified. Edge-only visibility prevents independent verification of the underlying host and can mask rapid content changes. This protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only. It does not establish legitimacy and cannot offset the reputation risk.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for any login, credential entry, wallet connection, signing or transfer, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Passive viewing only is the most that is proportionate. Anyone who has already interacted with it should treat any exposed wallet or account credentials as potentially compromised and secure them immediately.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 91 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.195 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app.

- The request stayed on cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.195 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 6 |
| Edge IP addresses | 6 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 15 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 91 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [pomorutecvo.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pomorutecvo.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [polksvo.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/polksvo.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [mc-modhub.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mc-modhub.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [fastingegoogru.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fastingegoogru.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [dttjjkkllzbvesjzndtp.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dttjjkkllzbvesjzndtp.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [check-variational-vote.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/check-variational-vote.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [hachikoinufinance.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hachikoinufinance.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [arbitrumquest.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/arbitrumquest.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [m-dioneprotocol.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/m-dioneprotocol.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [zimzar.site](https://trustsniffer.com/report/zimzar.site), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/cookingwithsoniaweb3.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-27.*