---
title: "Is crypto-0r4.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-0r4.netlify.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is crypto-0r4.netlify.app Safe? Warning Signs, Score 25/100"
trust_score: 25
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-0r4.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-21
---

# Is crypto-0r4.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** crypto-0r4.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | Netlify 'Site not found' 404 error page stating the requested path does not exist on Netlify. It contains no service content, forms, financial claims, or brand-impersonation signals. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-0r4.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-0r4.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-0r4.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a subdomain on a managed static-hosting platform whose name suggests a cryptocurrency-related project. At the time of analysis its landing page showed only the platform's default "Site not found" error, saying the requested path does not exist. It presents no products, pricing, company description, contact details or calls to action, and no business model is visible. Its apparent purpose therefore cannot be established from the content, which is an empty placeholder or an unpublished deployment.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and the posture is cautionary. External reputation sources currently flag the site: one detection engine rates it malicious and another rates it suspicious. This is the decisive factor, and the site must be treated as **blacklisted** by external intelligence. The reputation risk is not offset by the valid encryption certificate or the reputable hosting. The visible content is also inconsistent with what the site did when exercised. The homepage shows a bare error message with no forms, yet automated sessions detected concealed forms, including password-type fields, in every run. Large page-structure changes followed interaction, far more than a static error page should produce. A hidden credential-capture mechanism behind a placeholder front is a recognised pattern, although no phishing page or confirmed impersonation was observed. The page's name similarity to the hosting platform's own domain was also flagged as a possible brand lookalike. That signal is weak, because the visible content is the platform's genuine default error text. Two abuse reports exist against a shared edge address, but they are attributed to the provider's shared infrastructure and are given no weight against this site. No conflicting legal identities were observed, since no identity content exists to conflict. Evidence:

- Homepage: shows only the platform's "Site not found" message, with no forms, login prompts, financial claims or contact artifacts in the visible content.
- Automated browsing sessions (3 of 3 runs): detected 3 hidden forms, including password fields, on a page that visibly offers none.
- Automated browsing sessions: recorded 4,130 page-structure mutations after interaction, which is anomalous for a static 404 page.
- Domain provenance: first observed 2026-10-05 (~15 days old), with 1 archive snapshot in 2026 (1 year tracked), so there is no established history.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site carries no legal, terms, privacy or about content, so no operator, company, jurisdiction, licence or registration is stated. The real-world operator is therefore unverified, and ownership and governance are opaque in a way that cannot be resolved from the site. The hosting platform's name appears on the error page, but this identifies the platform, not the operator. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match was found, so there is no external reputational signal on this point. If the site later presents financial or crypto-related services, none of its claims could be treated as authorised or regulated without independent confirmation. Evidence:

- Homepage: contains no company name, licence, registration number or jurisdiction.
- Transport encryption: an organisation-validated certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. It is held by the hosting platform and does not identify the site's operator.
- Reputation lookup: no match in the broker-reputation dataset.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the operator's identity should be established through channels independent of this site. The site publishes no verifiable operator details, so any later party claiming to run it should be asked for a registered legal entity and, if financial or crypto services are offered, a licence checked directly with the relevant regulator's registry. The external detections should be re-checked after a fresh scan, to see whether they persist and whether the concealed forms remain. Any hosting-abuse report or takedown request should go through the hosting platform's abuse channel. Official contact channels should be confirmed through an independent, offline route. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator or support information to cross-check.
- Automated browsing sessions: concealed forms in every run would need to be re-tested once real content is published.
- Domain provenance: only a single archive observation exists, so there is no prior content to compare with.

### Summary Verdict

The site is assessed as **low trust with elevated risk**. A confirmed external reputation flag, a mismatch between its blank visible content and its concealed credential-style forms, and a very short, unverified history converge on a cautionary posture. Technical hygiene is sound but does not establish legitimacy, and the operator's identity remains unverified.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served through Amazon's content-delivery edge network, and all four observed addresses belong to that edge network. The origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only, since it shows no abuse-oriented hosting pattern, but edge-only visibility prevents independent verification of the true host and can mask rapid content changes. The encryption certificate is valid and well-formed, but it protects transport only and says nothing about the operator's intent. Evidence:

- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US) on edge addresses, with no origin candidate observed.
- Transport encryption: OV certificate with about 149 days remaining.

### Closing Assessment

The site should be limited to read-only viewing at most. Sign-in, credential entry, wallet connections and any payment or financial interaction should be avoided until the operator is independently identified and the external detections are cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 05 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-0r4.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-0r4.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-05. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-05 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-0r4.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [crypto-kad.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-kad.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 32/100)
- [portal-moonshot-ky6.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-ky6.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-wo8.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-wo8.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-jrt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-jrt.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-yfo.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-yfo.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-xz3.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-xz3.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-uux.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-uux.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-6d4.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-6d4.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [saturnreward.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/saturnreward.xyz), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [vetonv.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vetonv.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-0r4.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-0r4.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-21.*
