---
title: "Is crypto-bes.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-bes.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is crypto-bes.netlify.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-bes.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is crypto-bes.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** crypto-bes.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | A Netlify 'Site not found' 404 error page indicating that no site is deployed at the requested path. The page contains no product, service, login, or business content, so no trust or risk signals can be assessed beyond the absence of deception. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 11 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (2 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-bes.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-bes.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-bes.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a subdomain on the Netlify hosting platform. The name suggests a crypto-related service, but a visitor sees only the platform's generic "Site not found" error page. That page says the requested address does not exist and invites visitors to build and deploy their own site. It has no products, services, company information or contact details, and no monetization or business model is visible. The address appears to be a reserved or abandoned deployment slot, or one whose content is withheld from ordinary visits.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

One confirmed contradiction applies: the address is on an external blacklist, and a multi-engine reputation check rated it malicious in one engine and suspicious in another. That is a narrow but real detection. It is the decisive reason for the cautionary posture, and it is not offset by the benign appearance of the visible page. Two abuse reports exist against a related IP address, but they sit on shared content-delivery infrastructure that serves many unrelated customers, so they are discounted and not attributed to this site. No conflicting legal identities and no confirmed phishing or brand-impersonation finding were observed. The page analyzer did flag a close lookalike relationship to the hosting platform's own name, which reflects the shared subdomain structure and is not proof of impersonation. The most important behavioral finding is that the visible page does not match what the browser sandbox saw. Every sandbox run detected hidden forms, including password-type input fields, on a page that shows only a 404 notice. The page also made very large DOM changes after interaction and sent a heavy volume of outbound requests, almost all to external destinations. No sandbox run showed cloaking, wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering or drainer behavior. The destinations of the outbound traffic were also classed as benign. Even so, concealed credential-capture structures behind an empty-looking page are what a staged or dormant credential-harvesting deployment looks like, particularly when the domain name evokes cryptocurrency. This site belongs in the elevated-risk category. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page content is a platform 404 notice, yet all 3 of 3 sandbox runs detected hidden forms and password-type fields (3 hidden forms per the sandbox signals).
- Domain history: only about 12 days of observed history, with 2 archive snapshots from 2026-10-08 to 2026-10-16 (1 year tracked, 2026), which gives no track record to weigh against the detection.
- Reputation: 1 engine malicious and 1 suspicious against 58 harmless, together with a confirmed external blacklist entry.
- Homepage behavior: about 38 external network events in the sandbox, with 99.6% of activity at peak going to external destinations and a large post-interaction DOM change of 4,130 mutations.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The observed page contains no legal, about, terms, privacy or licensing content, no registration number and no operator name. No license or regulatory authorization is claimed, so there is nothing to validate and no claim to contradict. The real-world operator therefore cannot be tied to any person, company or brand, and the site's ownership and governance are opaque. The transport-encryption certificate was issued to the hosting platform itself, not to any operator of this subdomain, so it shows that the platform's infrastructure is sound and says nothing about who controls the content here. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists for this address, which means no reputational information is available either way. The missing license and disclosures are verification gaps, and they are not evidence of wrongdoing by themselves. The confirmed blacklist entry is what drives the cautionary assessment. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, jurisdiction, license or registration number, and no legal pages.
- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS16509 (Amazon, AMAZON-02, US; ARIN registry).
- Transport encryption: OV certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19 (about 150 days remaining).
- Third-party broker check: no match against a broker-reputation dataset, so no reputational signal in either direction.

### What to Verify Next

Anyone expecting a real service at this address should first establish who deployed it. The hosting platform's abuse and support channels can confirm whether the site is active, suspended or under review. If a business or individual claims a connection to this address, that claim should be confirmed through the claimant's independently sourced official channels, not through anything found at this address. Any licensing claim the operator later makes should be checked against the relevant regulator's own public register. Pending that, no credentials, wallet approvals or payment details should be given to this address, and any link or message that sent a visitor here should be treated as suspect. Evidence:

- Homepage: the platform's own "Site not found" notice with a platform support reference appears, so the hosting provider is the natural first point of contact.
- Sandbox: 3 of 3 runs completed with stable HTTP 200 responses, so the hidden-form behavior is repeatable and not a one-off.
- Sandbox: no wallet-connection, clipboard-write or drainer activity was observed in any run.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is elevated risk. A confirmed external blacklist entry, a very short history and a mismatch between the visible page and its concealed behavior outweigh the benign appearance of the error page. Technical hygiene on the platform side lends no credibility to the operator, whose identity is unverified.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Amazon's content-delivery and hosting network behind a valid, platform-issued certificate, and all four observed addresses are edge servers on that shared network. That is a mitigating factor only, because shared edge infrastructure cannot offset the reputation detection. The real origin server was not observable, which prevents independent confirmation of where the content is hosted and allows the content to be swapped without any visible change at the edge.


### Closing Assessment

Use of this address should be limited to passive viewing, and the site should be avoided for any login, credential entry, wallet interaction or payment. Any party that encountered it through a link, advertisement or message should report that source to the hosting platform's abuse team.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 05 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-bes.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-bes.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-08. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.03 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-08 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-bes.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [robinhood-main-dex-uvm.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-uvm.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-zhq.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-zhq.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [crypto-s8t.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-s8t.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-psg.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-psg.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [pump-voting-wqg.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-voting-wqg.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-jnt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-jnt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-mqt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-mqt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [breadcat-fi-q50.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/breadcat-fi-q50.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [deepsnitch-ai.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/deepsnitch-ai.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-bes.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-bes.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*