--- title: "Is crypto-br2.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "crypto-br2.netlify.app" verdict: "Low Trust" title: "Is crypto-br2.netlify.app Safe? Warning Signs, Score 25/100" trust_score: 25 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-br2.netlify.app assessed: 2026-10-20 --- # Is crypto-br2.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** crypto-br2.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky. Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | Netlify-hosted 404 page reporting 'Site not found' for the requested path. The page contains no service, product, or business content to evaluate. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 11 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the crypto-br2.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-br2.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png) _What crypto-br2.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview This is a placeholder page served under a free-hosting subdomain whose name suggests a Brazil-oriented crypto service. A visitor sees only a generic "Site not found" error saying the path does not exist on the Netlify hosting platform, with a link to the host's troubleshooting guide and a prompt to start building a site. It shows no products, pricing, company information or contact details, and no business model is visible. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk The evidence contains a **confirmed external blacklist listing** for this domain. At least one independent reputation source rates it as malicious and another as suspicious, so the listing is not a one-off false positive. Two further observations make the listing more worrying. The subdomain label pairs a crypto theme with a numbered suffix, and the page analysis flags a strong lookalike resemblance to the hosting platform's own brand. In addition, the page presents itself as a bare error screen, yet behavioural testing found hidden forms and password-type inputs in the document on all three test runs, with very large structural changes to the page after interaction. A genuine "not found" page would have no use for concealed credential fields. This pattern is consistent with a template or staging shell that is dormant at the time of analysis and could be switched to a credential-collection or wallet-lure page. The analysis found no network posts to non-whitelisted destinations, no wallet-connection prompts and no clipboard manipulation, so no active theft mechanism was observed. No conflicting legal identities were found. The risk rests on the blacklist listing, the lookalike naming and the concealed form behaviour. Evidence: - Homepage: the visible content is only a hosting-platform 404 message with no business content, while the behavioural runs recorded concealed forms and password inputs in every run. - Domain provenance: the site was first archived on 2026-10-08, about 12 days before analysis (~0.03 years old), with a single archive snapshot (2026, 1 year tracked), so it has no meaningful history. - Reputation: independent threat-intelligence sources currently list the domain, one as malicious and one as suspicious. - Naming: the subdomain imitates the style of a crypto offering, and the hosting platform's brand is flagged as a lookalike target. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site discloses no operating entity, licence, registration number, terms or privacy policy, because the only page reachable is a host-generated error. No regulator or authority can be linked to the domain, and the real-world operator is unverified. These are verification gaps, not proof of fraud, and the contradictions above are what drive the cautionary posture. No broker-reputation entry matched the domain, so no third-party regulatory signal exists either way. Legitimacy therefore rests on nothing more than a valid transport-encryption certificate, which attests to the connection and not to the operator. Evidence: - Homepage and legal pages: no company name, licence, address, terms or privacy content is present, and no policy or contact pages were found. - Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US). - Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is OV-validated and issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. This identifies the hosting platform as certificate subject, not the site's operator. ### What to Verify Next The first step is to establish who controls this subdomain and whether it is linked to any real crypto or financial brand. Any invitation, advertisement or message that led to this address should be traced to its sender through an independent channel. Any brand or service the site appears to imitate should be contacted through its own officially published channels, and the link's origin reported there. If the site later shows a login, deposit or wallet screen, the operator's licensing status should be checked in the relevant financial regulator's public register before any engagement. A second analysis should be run once the site displays real content, since the current page tells an assessor almost nothing about its eventual purpose. Evidence: - Homepage: the page offers no operator name or claim that could be checked against a registry. - Behavioural testing: concealed forms were present in all three runs, so the content that eventually appears should be reviewed. - Domain provenance: the very recent first sighting means no track record exists to rely on. ### Summary Verdict The site is assessed as **low trust with an elevated risk posture**. A confirmed external blacklist listing, a lookalike-style crypto-themed address, a very recent online presence and concealed credential-type inputs behind an apparently empty page converge on the conclusion that it is potentially a staging point for deceptive activity. The valid encryption certificate and the absence of observed live theft mechanisms do not offset this. The operator's identity cannot be independently connected to any real person or brand. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind AWS-fronted content-delivery infrastructure on Amazon's network, and all four observed addresses are edge servers, so the true origin was not observable. Because this setup is shared, it limits direct attribution of the infrastructure-level signals and is only a mitigating factor. A handful of abuse reports exist against one of the shared edge addresses, but they relate to shared provider infrastructure and are not attributed to this site specifically. The platform's protection cannot offset the domain-level reputation problems. ### Closing Assessment The site should be treated as unsafe for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial interaction. At most it should be viewed passively, ideally from an isolated environment. Anyone who reached it through an unsolicited link or message should disengage and report the source. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, page content, history in the web archive. ### 01 External reputation - A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`) ### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox - The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 04 Page content - The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`) ### 05 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-br2.netlify.app. - The request stayed on crypto-br2.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-08. (Clear) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 | | SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 | | Domain age | 0.03 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-08 | | Archive snapshots | 1 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-br2.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-raf.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-41u.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-41u.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [portal-moonshot-mzv.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-mzv.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [pump-voting-3v.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-voting-3v.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [crypto-qgk.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-qgk.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [portal-moonshot-3xa.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-3xa.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [portal-moonshot-033.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-033.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [portal-moonshot-zh5.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-zh5.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100) - [atlantatree.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/atlantatree.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100) - [ready-text.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ready-text.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-br2.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-br2.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*