---
title: "Is crypto-cmu.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-cmu.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is crypto-cmu.netlify.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-cmu.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is crypto-cmu.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** crypto-cmu.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | The page is a Netlify 'Site not found' 404 error. The requested site or path does not exist on Netlify, and the page offers no services, forms, or content to assess. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (2 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-cmu.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-cmu.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-cmu.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

The assessed address is a subdomain on a shared website-hosting platform that currently returns the platform's generic "Site not found" error page. The page offers no products, services, forms, navigation or brand claims, and no business model can be inferred from it. The subdomain name suggests a crypto-related project, but nothing on the captured page confirms or describes one. The address looks like a newly created or since-removed deployment, not an operating business.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This is a **confirmed adverse-reputation case**, so the assessment is cautionary. Several independent security engines currently flag the address as malicious or suspicious, and an external blacklist record exists for it. Those detections are the decisive factor. No phishing page, brand impersonation, or conflicting legal identities were confirmed. The page text itself is a benign hosting-platform error notice. The platform-lookalike similarity noted in the analysis comes from the address sitting on that platform's own domain space, not from a confirmed imitation. Behavioural testing showed concealed form elements and password-type fields in all three runs, even though the visible page is a bare 404. It also showed unusually heavy page restructuring after interaction, with thousands of DOM mutations, and substantial third-party request traffic. A static error page should not behave this way. This suggests the content served to automated visitors may differ from what is displayed, or that the deployment is being staged or swapped. Four abuse reports exist for one of the network addresses serving the site. That address belongs to a shared content-delivery pool, so those reports reflect other tenants of the shared infrastructure and are not evidence about this site's operator. The reputation detections on the domain stand on their own. Evidence:

- Domain registration is about 13 days old (roughly 0.04 years), and the web archive holds only 2 snapshots, first seen 2026-10-07 and last seen 2026-10-15 (1 year tracked). This is a very young, thinly documented address.
- Homepage capture: a 404 "Site not found" page of about 368 characters, with no links, forms, social profiles or metadata.
- Behavioural runs: hidden forms in 3 of 3 runs, 3 password-type fields, about 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction, and 36 external network requests.
- Security engines: 2 malicious and 1 suspicious detections on the domain, plus an external blacklist hit. 4 abuse reports apply to a shared CDN edge IP.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page contains no legal, terms, privacy, about or contact content. It names no company, claims no license and states no registration number. Because the page is only a hosting placeholder, nothing on it can be assessed for regulatory standing. The real-world operator therefore cannot be independently linked to any person or organisation, and any later claim of financial or investment activity at this address would need to be treated as entirely unsubstantiated. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record exists for the site, so there is no external reputational signal to weigh beyond the security detections above. The security certificate and hosting footprint are those of the hosting platform, not evidence about whoever controls this subdomain. Evidence:

- The TLS certificate is an organisation-validated (OV) certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc., valid to 2027-03-19. It authenticates the hosting platform, not the site's operator.
- The site is served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Homepage: no license, registration number, company name or jurisdiction is stated.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the operator and the project behind this address should be established through an independent route. Ask for the operator's legal entity name and registration number, check them against the relevant company registry, and, if any financial service is later offered, check licensing with the competent regulator. Official links to the project should come only from a trusted source such as a verified announcement channel, not from messages or ads pointing at this address. The security detections should be re-checked after a period of days, since a placeholder page that later turns into a live site is the point at which hidden forms and wallet or credential prompts would become active. Evidence:

- The archive shows two captures only, 8 days apart, so no content history can be reviewed.
- The homepage exposes no named operator, so registry lookups have nothing to start from until one is supplied.
- Hidden password-type fields were present across all behavioural runs, so any future login or wallet prompt at this address warrants scrutiny.

### Summary Verdict

The posture is elevated risk. Active adverse reputation detections, a very recently created address with almost no history, and concealed credential-type form behaviour on an otherwise empty page together outweigh the neutral error content. Identity is unverified. No impersonation of a specific brand or conflicting legal identity was confirmed, so the concern rests on reputation and behaviour, not on a proven scam.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Amazon's content-delivery and edge network, with all four observed IP addresses being edge servers and no origin server observable. This is standard protective infrastructure and mitigates direct exposure of the host. It does not offset the adverse reputation detections, and edge-only visibility prevents independent confirmation of where the content actually originates. It also allows content to be swapped quickly without any change in the visible network footprint.


### Closing Assessment

The address should be treated as read-only at most. No login, credential entry, wallet connection, payment or file download should take place at it unless a verified operator identity and a clean security re-assessment are first established.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 05 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-cmu.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-cmu.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-07. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-07 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-cmu.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [crypto-sbz.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-sbz.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-uvm.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-uvm.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-zhq.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-zhq.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [crypto-s8t.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-s8t.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-psg.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-psg.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [pump-voting-wqg.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-voting-wqg.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-jnt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-jnt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [techtasticai.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/techtasticai.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [rpsrescue.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rpsrescue.org), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-cmu.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-cmu.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*
