---
title: "Is crypto-cpm.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-cpm.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is crypto-cpm.netlify.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-cpm.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is crypto-cpm.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** crypto-cpm.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | Netlify 'Site not found' 404 page. The requested site has no deployed content, so no service, offer, or claim can be assessed. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-cpm.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-cpm.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-cpm.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is an unpopulated subdomain on a shared static-hosting platform. Its homepage shows only the platform's generic "Site not found" 404 error page, which says the address does not exist on the hosting service and invites visitors to start building their own site. It presents no products, services, branding or stated business purpose. The domain name suggests a crypto-themed project, but no content has been deployed to support that.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they drive the cautionary posture of this assessment. Several independent reputation engines flag the domain as malicious, and one more rates it suspicious. Together these amount to a confirmed **blacklist** listing. The page does not confirm phishing or brand impersonation, and it shows no conflicting legal identities. Separately, the hosting provider's address range has two abuse reports, but they relate to shared infrastructure that serves many tenants. They are given no weight against this site. The more notable behavioural finding is a mismatch with the visible page. The homepage looks like an inert error screen with no forms, yet automated browsing sessions detected concealed forms containing password fields on every run. The page content also changed substantially after interaction, and nearly all of its network traffic went to third-party destinations. None of the outbound submissions went to unvetted destinations, and no wallet-connection, clipboard-tampering or fingerprinting behaviour was seen. Even so, a placeholder page that carries hidden credential-capture elements is inconsistent with a benign "nothing deployed" state. It is also consistent with a staging or dormant phishing-kit placeholder. The evidence does not establish which explanation is correct, but the combination with the blacklist listing makes the benign reading unsafe to assume. Evidence:

- Homepage: two reputation engines rate the domain malicious and one suspicious, and the site is also on an external blacklist.
- Homepage sandbox: hidden forms with password fields were detected in 3 of 3 browsing runs, although the visible page contains no forms.
- Homepage sandbox: 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction, and about 99.6% of network activity directed to external hosts.
- Hosting network: 2 abuse reports on a shared provider address, treated as attributable to the shared platform rather than to this site.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site has no legal, terms, privacy, about or contact pages. The homepage names no operator, makes no regulatory or licensing claim, and cannot be tied to any real-world brand or individual, so its identity remains unverified. A crypto-oriented name with no content means no licensing position can be evaluated, and this is not treated as a finding by itself. The transport encryption is valid and confirms control of the hostname, but a certificate does not establish who operates the site. It is therefore a hygiene factor, not a legitimacy signal, and cannot offset the threat detections above. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record was matched for this site. Evidence:

- Homepage: contains only the hosting platform's 404 notice and a "Start building" prompt, with no operator name, address or registration number.
- Transport encryption: organisation-validated TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19 (about 150 days remaining).
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the party proposing this address should state who deployed it and what it is meant to host. An authentic operator should be able to name a legal entity and publish it on a live site. Any claim of a connection to a crypto or financial service should be checked directly with that service, using contact details taken from its independently known official channels and not from this address. The hidden password-bearing forms should be re-examined if the site later goes live, and any real content should be re-assessed from scratch. Until then the domain should be treated as a blocklist candidate for internal email and web filtering. Evidence:

- Homepage: no deployed content exists against which any claim can be checked.
- Homepage sandbox: concealed credential fields appeared consistently across all runs, so a later content deployment warrants fresh analysis.
- External reputation: the blacklist listing should be re-checked after any content change to see whether detections clear.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Confirmed external threat detections, together with concealed credential-capture behaviour on an otherwise empty page and an unverified operator, outweigh the technically sound but neutral features of the site. The evidence does not show a deployed scam product, but it also provides no legitimate purpose that could balance the threat indicators.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind the hosting provider's CDN/WAF layer, and all four observed addresses are edge nodes with no origin server visible. This is a mitigating factor only, and it does not offset the reputation findings. Edge-only visibility prevents independent confirmation of what actually hosts the content, and it allows deployed content to be swapped rapidly, which is particularly relevant for an undeployed placeholder.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. No login, credential entry, wallet connection or financial interaction should take place on this domain, and links to it received through email, messaging or social channels should be treated as suspect and reported to the relevant security team or platform abuse contact.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)
- The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH`)
- The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION`)

### 03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-cpm.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-cpm.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-cpm.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [send-usdt-999.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-usdt-999.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [send-usdt-9999.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-usdt-9999.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [usdt-transfer-bep-1-5.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/usdt-transfer-bep-1-5.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [eventchecker-rb.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/eventchecker-rb.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [send-bep-01.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-bep-01.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [dazzling-valkyrie-11a286.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dazzling-valkyrie-11a286.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [send-usd-trust.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-usd-trust.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [jptcheckstatus-ui.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jptcheckstatus-ui.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [phnxprotocol.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/phnxprotocol.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [coolwalletdesktop.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coolwalletdesktop.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-cpm.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-cpm.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*