---
title: "Is crypto-fiq.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 2/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-fiq.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is crypto-fiq.netlify.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 2/100"
trust_score: 2
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-fiq.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is crypto-fiq.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 2/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 2/100.** crypto-fiq.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | A hosting-platform 404 page reporting that the requested site or path does not exist. It contains no product, login, commercial, or informational content. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-fiq.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-fiq.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-fiq.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a bare hosting-platform "Site not found" page served from a free-tier subdomain whose name suggests a crypto-related project. It shows no product, login, pricing, deposit or informational content, and its only offer is the host's own prompt to build and deploy a site. No business model is visible. The address appears to be a placeholder or an abandoned or unpublished deployment, not an operating service.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and the posture is cautionary. At least one threat-intelligence engine rates the domain as malicious and another as suspicious, which produces a **confirmed external blacklist** entry. The hosting platform's error page shows no deceptive content in itself. The risk comes from what the domain could become, and from behaviour recorded during sandbox visits. In all three runs the page carried hidden form elements, and password-type fields were detected even though no visible form exists. The page also produced very large post-load DOM changes, with several thousand mutations on a page of under 400 characters of text. A 404 page should not behave this way. This pattern is consistent with content being swapped or injected after load, or with a credential-capture template staged behind the error page. Nothing in the capture shows credentials being sent to an untrusted destination, and no wallet-drainer or clipboard-hijack behaviour was observed. The page-analysis layer also flagged the address as a possible lookalike of the hosting brand. This is most plausibly an artefact of the address being a tenant subdomain of that platform, so it is a minor corroborating signal and not proof of impersonation. Combined with a crypto-flavoured subdomain name, the blacklist entry and the concealed form behaviour make this a plausible staging location for crypto-themed credential or wallet phishing. That is a reasoned risk assessment, not a demonstrated attack.


Evidence:
- Homepage capture: the page is a "Site not found" message from the hosting platform, with no products, contact details or commercial content.
- Sandbox behaviour: hidden forms and password-type fields were detected in every run, with no visible form on the page.
- Sandbox behaviour: several thousand DOM mutations followed interaction on a page of 368 characters of text.
- Reputation checks: one engine returned a malicious verdict and one a suspicious verdict for the domain.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The page makes no claims about licensing, registration, regulation, legal terms or a corporate entity. There is no about, terms or privacy page and no named operator, so nothing on the site connects it to an accountable real-world party. The operator's identity remains unverified. In a financial or crypto-adjacent context this absence is a verification gap and not evidence of wrongdoing by itself. In this case it adds to the contradictory signals above and offers no counterweight. No third-party broker or regulator listing was matched, so there is no external reputational context that could confirm the operator. The signals that support legitimacy are limited to technical hygiene. The site uses a valid organisation-validated TLS certificate that belongs to the hosting platform, not to the site's own operator. It therefore says nothing about who runs this site.


Evidence:
- Homepage capture: no operator name, licence, registration number or legal page is present.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 at OV validation level, to Netlify, Inc, and is valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: the site is served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Broker-reputation check: no match was found.

### What to Verify Next

No work should be done with this address until the operator has been identified through a channel independent of the site. Anyone who received this link in connection with a crypto, wallet, trading or investment offer should confirm the project's official domain through its verified announcements or an established directory. They should not rely on this address or on the message that delivered it. Any claimed relationship with the project, such as a partnership or airdrop, should be checked through the organisation's official contact route. If the site is yours, review the deployment, remove any unrecognised forms or scripts, and rotate any deployment tokens or credentials that may have been exposed.


Evidence:
- Homepage capture: the site offers no content, so there is nothing on it that could be used to validate an operator.
- Sandbox behaviour: hidden password-type forms require a source-level review of what the page actually delivers.
- Reputation checks: the current threat-intelligence detections should be rechecked after any remediation.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is elevated risk. Technical hygiene is clean, but it is outweighed by confirmed adverse reputation, concealed form behaviour and an unidentified operator. The site reads as a placeholder at best and a staging point for credential-oriented abuse at worst, and the evidence does not rule out the latter.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Amazon-operated edge infrastructure, and the underlying origin server is not observable. The four resolved addresses all belong to shared edge infrastructure, so hosting-level conclusions about the operator cannot be drawn. This arrangement is a mitigating factor only and does not offset the reputation findings. A small number of abuse reports exist against one of the edge addresses. They relate to shared provider infrastructure, not specifically to this site, so they carry no weight against it.


### Closing Assessment

The address should be treated as an untrusted destination. Credentials, wallet connections, seed phrases and payments should not be entered or submitted at this address. At most, it may be opened passively for inspection from an isolated environment. Anyone who has already interacted with it should treat any credentials or wallet permissions they supplied as potentially exposed and revoke them.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)
- The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH`)
- The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION`)

### 03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-fiq.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-fiq.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-fiq.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [memes-airdrop.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/memes-airdrop.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-tuk.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-tuk.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 2/100)
- [crypto-4ql.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-4ql.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 7/100)
- [crypto-1z5.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-1z5.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-gc5.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-gc5.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-3z2.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-3z2.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-tn0.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-tn0.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-tu0.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-tu0.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [dovu.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dovu.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [api-polkastarter.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/api-polkastarter.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24)
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-fiq.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-fiq.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*