---
title: "Is crypto-fk9.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-fk9.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is crypto-fk9.netlify.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-fk9.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-21
---

# Is crypto-fk9.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** crypto-fk9.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | A Netlify 'Site not found' 404 page stating the requested site or path does not exist on the hosting platform. The page contains no login, forms, offers, or service description. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-fk9.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-fk9.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-fk9.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a subdomain on a shared, third-party website-hosting platform. It has a cryptocurrency-themed name, and the only content it served was the platform's generic "Site not found" error page. The page shows no service description, products, offers, login, or forms. No business model or operator can be determined from what it presents, so its apparent purpose is unknown.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The assessment is clearly cautionary. A confirmed external blacklist hit exists against this address, so this is a reputational contradiction rather than a neutral unknown. Several indicators converge on it. The visible page is an empty error notice, but automated browsing runs repeatedly detected concealed forms, including password-type fields, and very large page changes after interaction. A stub that renders as a "not found" page while holding concealed credential-capable forms is consistent with a staging or cloaking pattern. The crypto-themed name sits on a platform where content can be swapped within minutes. The page analysis also flagged a lookalike resemblance to the hosting platform's own brand. That is a suspicion only, not a confirmed impersonation, and no conflicting legal identities were found. Abuse reports exist against one of the shared edge addresses serving the site. They are attributed to shared provider infrastructure, so they say less about this specific site than the blacklist hit does. Indicators associated with phishing were also recorded in the screening. No wallet-connection, clipboard-manipulation, or fingerprinting activity was observed. Evidence:

- Homepage: renders only the platform's "Site not found" 404 notice, with no visible forms, offers, or legal text.
- Sandbox behaviour: concealed forms detected in 3 of 3 runs, 3 password-form detections, and 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction.
- External reputation: one engine flagged the site malicious and one suspicious; 4 abuse reports on a shared CDN edge IP (category 14), last reported about 26 days before analysis.
- Observed history: first archived 2026-10-06 with a single snapshot (about 14 days of observed history, 1 year tracked).

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No licence, registration number, company name, terms page, or privacy policy is present, and no regulator or licensing claim is made. The captured page is an error notice, so no legal or identity pages could be assessed. Real-world operator identity is unverified, and ownership and governance are opaque. This is a verification gap, not evidence of wrongdoing, but here it compounds the reputational contradiction. No third-party broker reputation record matched the site. Its transport encryption is technically sound, but that confirms only encrypted transport, not who operates the site or what it will serve. Evidence:

- Homepage: contains no company name, licence claim, or jurisdiction disclosure.
- Transport layer: organization-validated TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. The certificate belongs to the hosting platform, not an independent site operator.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

The first step is to establish who deployed the site and why it currently returns an error. Ask the party that supplied the address for an independent explanation. If the site later presents financial or investment services, check any claimed licence directly in the relevant regulator's public register. Confirm official contact channels through an independent route, such as a verified corporate directory or a known offline contact. Re-test the address after any content change, since the current page offers nothing to assess. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator, contact route, or service description exists to cross-check.
- Page analysis: the underlying site's economic model could not be determined from the capture.
- Sandbox behaviour: concealed forms mean any later live content needs fresh scrutiny.

### Summary Verdict

Available evidence supports a high-risk posture. A confirmed blacklist hit, concealed credential-capable forms behind an empty page, a brand-lookalike suspicion, and a very short observed history outweigh the technically valid encryption. The site's operator and purpose are unverified, and nothing observed offsets the reputational findings.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through AWS-based CDN edge servers, and every observed address is an edge node. The origin server could not be observed, so hosting cannot be independently verified. The edge delivery is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the external reputation findings, and it makes rapid content swaps harder to detect.


### Closing Assessment

Treat the address as unsafe for any login, credential entry, or financial interaction. Limit contact to passive viewing, if any, and do not download anything from it. Re-assess only if the operator is independently identified and the reputation findings are cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 05 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-fk9.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-fk9.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-06. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-06 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-fk9.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [crypto-gm2.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-gm2.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-0ts.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-0ts.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-y5b.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-y5b.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-esj.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-esj.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-7lr.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-7lr.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crypto-mru.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-mru.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-5wb.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-5wb.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-0w6.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-0w6.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [bpmrvllrs.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bpmrvllrs.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100)
- [solldrop.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solldrop.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-fk9.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-fk9.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-21.*