---
title: "Is crypto-jnp.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-jnp.netlify.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is crypto-jnp.netlify.app Safe? Warning Signs, Score 25/100"
trust_score: 25
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-jnp.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is crypto-jnp.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** crypto-jnp.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | Default hosting-provider 'Site not found' 404 page with no site content, forms, or commercial offer. No fraud or deception signals are present, but there is nothing to assess beyond the error response. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-jnp.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-jnp.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-jnp.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a hosting-platform placeholder. Its only public page is the Netlify default "Site not found" error, which says the visitor followed a broken link or entered a URL that does not exist on the platform and offers a link to start building a site for free. The address is a user-created subdomain whose name suggests a crypto-related project, but the page shows no product, offer, pricing, company name or stated purpose. It therefore has no observable business model.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Confirmed contradictory signals are present, so this site is treated as elevated risk. An external threat-intelligence check flags the domain as **blacklisted**: one detection engine rated it malicious and another rated it suspicious. The major browser safe-browsing service did not list it, so this is a reputational signal of moderate strength and not a confirmed phishing finding. Abuse reports (four in total) exist against one of the shared hosting addresses serving the site. They were not discounted, but they attach to infrastructure that other tenants also use, so they cannot be pinned on this site alone. The sandbox also found behaviour that does not fit a static error page. Across all three test runs, concealed forms were present, including password-type fields. The page also underwent very heavy structural change after interaction and made a large volume of external requests. The page's visible content declares no forms at all. A crypto-themed hostname that resolves to an empty page with concealed credential-capable elements is the pattern seen when a placeholder is staged for later repurposing or is mimicking a brand. The hostname also closely resembles the hosting platform's own domain, and the brand-similarity check flagged this. No conflicting legal identities exist, because the site names no entity. No impersonation of a specific financial brand was demonstrated. Evidence:

- Homepage: the platform's default 404 page, with no forms, offer or legal identity, yet the sandbox recorded concealed forms in 3 of 3 runs.
- Domain provenance: the address is a hosting-platform subdomain about 13 days old, and the web archive holds a single snapshot, dated 2026-10-07.
- Reputation: one malicious and one suspicious verdict from external engines; 4 abuse reports on a shared hosting address.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site makes no licensing claim, cites no regulator, and publishes no terms, privacy, about or contact pages, so there is nothing to test against a registry. The real-world operator is unverified. The only organisation named anywhere in the technical evidence is the hosting platform, which is the certificate holder, not the person who deployed this subdomain. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record exists for the site, so there is no reputational signal in either direction. The site's technical credentials are legitimate but say nothing about its operator. They show that the hosting platform is well established, not that the content published under this subdomain is. Evidence:

- Transport encryption: a valid organisation-validated TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Legal pages: none present; no company name, licence number or registration reference appears on the homepage.

### What to Verify Next

Anyone who received this link should first establish who sent it and why. The sender should confirm through an independent, offline route which exact address the project is meant to use. The hostname should be compared character by character with any official site of the claimed project. A different address is likely if the sender cannot name a registered operator. A site owner who did not expect this error should check whether the deployment was removed or taken over. No wallet connection, seed phrase, password or payment detail should be entered anywhere on this address until an operator is identified and the concealed forms are explained. Evidence:

- Homepage: the platform's own text directs a site owner to its troubleshooting guide, a check that applies if the owner is a legitimate party.
- Behavioural testing: hidden password-capable forms appeared on every run, so interaction is unsafe even though the visible page is empty.
- Hostname: the crypto-themed subdomain label is the only indication of intent and warrants confirmation with the referrer.

### Summary Verdict

Available evidence supports an elevated-risk, clearly cautionary posture. Reputation-based threat detections and concealed credential-capable forms behind an otherwise empty page outweigh the platform's legitimate technical credentials. The operator is unidentified, so no legitimacy can be inferred.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind AWS edge infrastructure, and all four observed addresses are edge addresses; no origin address was observable. This is a mitigating factor for resilience and abuse handling only. It does not offset the reputational detections, and the edge-only visibility means the underlying content could be changed quickly without being independently detected.


### Closing Assessment

Treat the address as read-only at most: do not log in, connect a wallet, submit credentials or make any payment, and reconsider only if a named operator is later confirmed through an independent channel.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 05 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-jnp.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-jnp.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-07. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-07 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-jnp.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [portal-moonshot-xz3.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-xz3.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-uux.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-uux.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-6d4.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-6d4.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-2cf.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-2cf.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-rtv.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-rtv.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-pbt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-pbt.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-2mw.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-2mw.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-59a.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-59a.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [node-live-6882-d3kx2ei95-vercel-project-key.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/node-live-6882-d3kx2ei95-vercel-project-key.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 30/100)
- [portal-moonshot-o8a.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-o8a.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24)
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-jnp.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-jnp.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*