---
title: "Is crypto-knr.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-knr.netlify.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is crypto-knr.netlify.app Safe? Warning Signs, Score 25/100"
trust_score: 25
classification_confidence: 64
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-knr.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is crypto-knr.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** crypto-knr.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 64%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | The captured page shows only the placeholder text 'redirecting..' with no observable content, so its purpose, owner, and offering cannot be determined. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 18 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | 7 snapshots (7 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-knr.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-knr.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-knr.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This is a minimal, newly observed web property hosted as a subdomain on a shared free-tier deployment platform. Its hostname suggests a cryptocurrency theme. When captured, the homepage rendered only a short "redirecting.." placeholder. It showed no title, branding, navigation, links, forms, contact details or legal pages. The site's purpose and business model cannot be determined from what it presents. The pattern is consistent with a redirect stub or interstitial, the kind often used as a staging hop in a longer traffic chain.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The most serious finding is that an external reputation source currently carries a **blacklist** listing against the domain. One engine rates it malicious and another rates it suspicious. The page content is empty, so these detections cannot be tied to any visible lure, and that leaves the listing as the decisive concern. The hostname also closely resembles the name of the hosting platform it sits on, which the page analysis registered as a suspected lookalike. This is not a confirmed brand impersonation, but it fits a pattern of borrowed credibility. No conflicting legal identities were found, and no phishing form, credential capture or wallet interaction was observed. Three behavioural runs showed no external requests, no hidden forms, no cloaking and no clipboard or wallet activity. That confirms only that the placeholder page is passive. It does not show that the redirect target, which was never captured, is safe. A crypto-themed name, a redirect placeholder, a blacklist hit and a very young domain together are a recognised high-risk archetype for traffic-forwarding and lure infrastructure. Evidence:

- Homepage: the only visible content was the 13-character placeholder "redirecting.."; no title, meta description, links or forms were present.
- External reputation: the domain is flagged by an external blacklist source (1 malicious and 1 suspicious detection).
- Domain provenance: the domain is about 18 days old (0.05 years), with 7 archive snapshots in 2026 and 1 year tracked.
- Behavioural sandbox: 3 of 3 runs completed with HTTP 200, 0 external requests and 0 wallet or clipboard events.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site presents no legal, terms, privacy or about pages and no company name, address, licence or registration number. Because the page is an empty placeholder, nothing on it claims financial or regulated activity, so there is no claim to test. Operator identity cannot be tied to any real-world person or organisation, so any apparent legitimacy rests on infrastructure-level signals only. Ownership and governance are opaque. This is an administrative limitation and not an identity contradiction. No third-party broker or regulator listing matched the domain, and the absence of one is neutral. The valid certificate belongs to the hosting platform and does not vouch for whoever published the content. Evidence:

- Homepage: no corporate entity, licence authority or registration number is disclosed, and no legal pages exist.
- Transport security: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Anyone who received this address through an unsolicited message, advertisement or social post should treat the sender as the item under scrutiny and check the originating channel independently. The redirect destination should be examined only in an isolated, disposable environment, since its final landing page was never captured. If a legitimate crypto service is claimed, its official domain should be obtained from an independently sourced listing and compared with this hostname. Any licensing or registration claim should be confirmed directly with the relevant registry. Official contact channels should be confirmed through an offline or independent route. Evidence:

- Homepage: the redirect target was not captured, so the final destination is unknown.
- Platform subdomain: the hostname is a free-tier subdomain, not an independently registered brand domain.
- Domain age: the domain is a few weeks old, so no long operating record exists to corroborate any claim.

### Summary Verdict

The available evidence supports an elevated-risk posture. An active external blacklist listing, a negligible operating history, an empty and unidentifiable page, and an unverified operator together outweigh the technically clean hosting and certificate hygiene. The site cannot be treated as legitimate or as established.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site runs on Amazon-operated cloud infrastructure behind a CDN/WAF layer, and every observed address is an edge node. The origin server was not observable, so hosting cannot be independently verified and content could be swapped quickly behind the edge. Protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only and does not offset the reputation risk. Two abuse reports were recorded against one shared provider address. They apply to infrastructure used by many tenants, have been discounted, and are not attributed to this site.


### Closing Assessment

Read-only observation of the placeholder page is the outer limit of reasonable interaction. Login, credential entry, wallet connection and any financial or payment action should be avoided. The site should not be shared or promoted, and any link that led to it should be reported to the platform or channel that delivered it.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, hosting and network.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Page content
- The page loaded on its own domain but had no readable content. (Page content `rule:PAGE_CONTENT_EMPTY`)
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)
- The page has no title, which almost every website sets. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TITLE_MISSING`)
- The browser raised a warning while loading the page. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BROWSER_FLAGS_SUSPICIOUS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-knr.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-knr.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.05 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 7 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-knr.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [portal-moonshot-gzf.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-gzf.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-cd8.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-cd8.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-swa.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-swa.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-muv.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-muv.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-88a.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-88a.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-uh6.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-uh6.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-m0e.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-m0e.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-4pa.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-4pa.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [erc-trust-wallet.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/erc-trust-wallet.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 26/100)
- [dapploytracs.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dapploytracs.top), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 43/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-knr.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-knr.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*