---
title: "Is crypto-qgk.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-qgk.netlify.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is crypto-qgk.netlify.app Safe? Warning Signs, Score 25/100"
trust_score: 25
classification_confidence: 64
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-qgk.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is crypto-qgk.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** crypto-qgk.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 64%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | The captured page displays only the text 'redirecting..' and contains no analyzable content, links, forms, or metadata. The final destination was not captured. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 18 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | 59 snapshots (59 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-qgk.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-qgk.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-qgk.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a single-page placeholder on a free subdomain of a public static-site hosting platform. The captured homepage shows only the text "redirecting.." and has no title, navigation, links, forms, products or metadata. It appears to exist to forward visitors to a destination that was not captured, so the underlying business model cannot be determined.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The decisive concern is that the site is **blacklisted** by external threat-intelligence sources. A multi-engine reputation scan returned one malicious and two suspicious detections, which makes this a confirmed reputational contradiction rather than a speculative one. The hostname carries a crypto-themed label, but the homepage contains no content, product or service to support it. A bare redirect page is a common way to hide where a visitor ends up, because the real destination can be swapped without any change visible on the page. A brand-similarity check also matched the hostname to the hosting platform's own domain. This is consistent with the name being a self-chosen subdomain under that platform's shared domain, and it does not indicate endorsement by the platform. Four abuse reports exist for one of the shared hosting addresses, but they attach to infrastructure used by many tenants, so they are weak evidence against this site specifically. Dynamic testing was benign: no wallet prompts, hidden forms, cloaking, clipboard manipulation or third-party requests. This shows the placeholder itself does nothing hostile. It does not clear the destination it points to. No conflicting legal identities were found. Evidence:

- Homepage: the captured content is only the text "redirecting..", with no links, forms or metadata, and the final destination was not captured.
- External reputation: the multi-engine scan recorded 1 malicious and 2 suspicious detections, and an external blacklist hit is confirmed. The 4 abuse reports apply to a shared provider address.
- Domain provenance: the domain is about 18 days old (registered 2026). The web archive holds 59 snapshots, all from 2026 (1 year tracked), so the site has essentially no established history.
- Sandbox behaviour: 3 of 3 runs returned stable HTTP 200 responses with zero external network activity, zero console errors and no cloaking.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site gives no legal, identity or compliance information. The homepage has no company name, terms, privacy notice, contact page or licensing claim, so none can be assessed, and the real-world operator is not independently verified. No financial offering is visible, so no licence is claimed or contradicted. The valid transport-encryption certificate is issued to the hosting platform, not to the site's operator, so it confirms the connection is encrypted but says nothing about who runs the site. No third-party broker record is associated with it. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, registration number, licence, terms of service or privacy policy is present.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is an OV certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19. The subject is the platform, not the site's operator.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US), with the registry shown as ARIN.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the redirect's real destination should be identified safely, for example by loading the page in an isolated, disposable environment with no accounts or wallets attached. Any destination should then be assessed on its own merits. The reputation detections should be re-checked once real content is served, and a platform abuse report can be filed if the redirect leads to a harmful page. If the destination turns out to offer financial or crypto services, the relevant licensing registry should be consulted. Any claim to be an official service should be confirmed through the claimed organisation's own channels, reached by an independent route. Until then no reliance should be placed on this page. Evidence:

- Homepage: the redirect target is not recorded, so its identity and legitimacy are untested.
- Reputation: the external blacklist hit and the multi-engine detections were present at the time of analysis and may change as the site changes.
- Behaviour: no forms, wallet interactions or external requests were observed on the placeholder itself.

### Summary Verdict

The assessment is clearly cautionary. Confirmed adverse reputation, a very new domain with no track record, an empty page and no verifiable operator together outweigh the mitigating technical hygiene. The evidence supports at most read-only observation. It does not support treating the site as legitimate.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Amazon's CDN/WAF edge, and every observed address is an edge server. The origin server is not observable, which prevents independent confirmation of the real host and means content could be changed quickly behind the edge. The protective infrastructure and valid encryption are mitigating factors only. They do not offset the external threat detections and are not evidence of legitimacy.


### Closing Assessment

Interaction should be limited to passive viewing. Credentials, account logins, wallet connections and payments should not be entered or made on this site or on wherever it redirects, and nothing should be downloaded from it. The site should be re-assessed only if it later serves substantive content under a verifiable operator.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, hosting and network.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Page content
- The page loaded on its own domain but had no readable content. (Page content `rule:PAGE_CONTENT_EMPTY`)
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)
- The page has no title, which almost every website sets. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TITLE_MISSING`)
- The browser raised a warning while loading the page. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BROWSER_FLAGS_SUSPICIOUS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-qgk.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-qgk.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.05 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 59 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-qgk.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [ethercentricpro.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ethercentricpro.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 29/100)
- [votingchoicemonitor.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votingchoicemonitor.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 46/100)
- [openseptembertrendingscore.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/openseptembertrendingscore.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [cointrendingselectionrank.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cointrendingselectionrank.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [coincommunitysupportedprojectboard.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coincommunitysupportedprojectboard.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-pgt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-pgt.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-lqx.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-lqx.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [crypto-l9k.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-l9k.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [blasttop.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blasttop.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [rayocosmico.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rayocosmico.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-qgk.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-qgk.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*