---
title: "Is crypto-sni.netlify.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "crypto-sni.netlify.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is crypto-sni.netlify.app Safe? Warning Signs, Score 25/100"
trust_score: 25
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-sni.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-20
---

# Is crypto-sni.netlify.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** crypto-sni.netlify.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | A standard hosting-platform 'Site not found' 404 page stating the requested path or site is not deployed. It contains no commercial, login, financial, or sensitive-data content. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 1% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 11 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the crypto-sni.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/crypto-sni.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What crypto-sni.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a subdomain on a public application-hosting platform, with a name suggesting a crypto-related project. At the time of analysis it served only the platform's generic "Site not found" 404 screen, which says the requested path or site is not deployed. The page shows no products, pricing, deposits, contact details, or login prompts, so no business model or operator purpose can be seen. The address nonetheless sits in a reputationally flagged and brand-lookalike context.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The analysis found a **confirmed external blacklist listing** for this address, and it is the decisive factor in the cautionary posture. Brand-similarity analysis also flags the subdomain as a close lookalike of the hosting platform's own namespace. The visible page matches that platform's genuine error screen, so this reads as a possible lookalike or placeholder, not an observed impersonation. Behavioral testing shows concealed form elements that were present and repeated across all test runs, and password-type fields were detected despite the page showing no visible login. The page also changed heavily after simulated interaction, and the final destination did not match the requested one. The reason for this combination cannot be determined from the 404 content, so it remains an unexplained anomaly. It is not a proven credential-harvesting mechanism. Four abuse reports exist against an address in the shared cloud edge range this site uses. They apply to shared provider infrastructure, so they are weak evidence about this specific site. No conflicting legal identities were found, and no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijacking, or cloaking behavior was observed. Evidence:

- Homepage: serves only the platform's 404 notice, with no commercial, financial, or contact content, and the page title and metadata are empty.
- Homepage behavior (3 of 3 test runs): hidden forms and password fields present with no visible login, and about 4,130 DOM mutations after interaction.
- Domain registered about 12 days before analysis (~0.03 years); the web archive holds 1 snapshot, first and last seen 2026-10-08.
- Reputation screening: 1 malicious and 1 suspicious detection, with a lookalike match to the hosting platform's namespace.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The only page available is a platform error screen, so there is no terms page, about page, legal entity name, licence number, or registration disclosure to assess. The site claims no regulatory authorisation and no licence was verified. The real-world operator therefore remains unverified, and nothing on the page lets the site be tied to any person or company. The TLS certificate names the hosting platform as the organisation, not the site's operator, so it confirms the platform and not the operator's identity. No third-party broker database entry matched this site, so there is no external regulatory or broker reputational signal to weigh either way. Evidence:

- Homepage: contains no company name, address, licence, or registration number, and no legal pages are reachable.
- Transport security: OV certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 to Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 – Amazon.com, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the operator should be identified through a channel independent of this address. Confirm with the intended counterparty, using a previously known offline or official route, that this exact address belongs to them. If the address came from a message, social post, or advertisement, treat that source as unconfirmed and compare the spelling character by character against the official hosting-platform and project addresses. Check whether the project is listed with a recognised registry that fits its claimed activity. Confirm any official support or contact channels via a separately sourced route. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator or counterparty information exists to check against.
- Domain: registered only days before analysis, with a single archive capture, so there is no track record to rely on.
- Brand-similarity analysis: the address closely resembles the hosting platform's namespace.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated, clearly cautionary risk posture. A confirmed external blacklist listing, combined with a very new address, an unverified operator, and unexplained hidden-form and page-change behavior, outweighs the benign appearance of the empty error page. The technical foundations are sound, but they establish only that the platform is reputable and not that the site's operator is.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Amazon-operated cloud edge infrastructure, with all observed addresses belonging to edge nodes and no origin server visible. This mitigates direct exposure and is consistent with a mainstream platform. It cannot offset the external reputation findings. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent hosting verification and would allow content to be swapped quickly without any visible change in the underlying infrastructure.


### Closing Assessment

Treat this address as read-only at most: do not log in, enter credentials, connect a wallet, or make any payment or financial transfer through it. Rely only on addresses obtained directly from a verified, independent source, and report the address to the hosting platform's abuse channel if it was received through an unsolicited message.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 05 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 1% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of crypto-sni.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on crypto-sni.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-08. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::258 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | 0.03 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-10-08 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 1% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about crypto-sni.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [crypto-lrt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-lrt.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-pst.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-pst.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-vtc.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-vtc.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-v2f.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-v2f.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-c4h.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-c4h.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-1nt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-1nt.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-zt7.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-zt7.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [portal-moonshot-83r.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-83r.netlify.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [mask.associates](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mask.associates), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [naturalsaltlamps.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/naturalsaltlamps.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-sni.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-sni.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-20.*