--- title: "Is cryptocexch.ink a Scam? Trust Score 17/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "cryptocexch.ink" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is cryptocexch.ink a Scam? Risk Report, Score 17/100" trust_score: 17 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/cryptocexch.ink assessed: 2026-10-19 --- # Is cryptocexch.ink a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 17/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 17/100.** cryptocexch.ink shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-19 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | Cloudflare-hosted warning page indicating the target site has been reported as suspected phishing. It asks users to enable cookies and displays a Ray ID and IP hint. No forms or monetization present. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 22 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (2 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the cryptocexch.ink homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/cryptocexch.ink/screenshots/first.png) _What cryptocexch.ink served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-19. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview cryptocexch.ink is currently represented to visitors by a Cloudflare security-warning page stating that the underlying website has been reported for suspected phishing. The captured page is informational rather than a functioning exchange or transaction interface: it requests that cookies be enabled, displays a warning and diagnostic identifiers, and presents no forms, monetization flow, or active service functionality. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk The domain presents a confirmed **blacklist** contradiction and should be treated as unsuitable for sensitive interaction. The captured Cloudflare page explicitly states “Suspected Phishing” and explains that the website has been reported for potential phishing. Although the warning page itself does not request credentials or process transactions, that protective presentation is evidence about the underlying domain’s current reputation, not an endorsement of the site. Independent identity verification is also incomplete, so the available evidence does not connect the domain reliably to a legitimate real-world operator. Evidence: - The captured homepage is titled “Suspected Phishing | Cloudflare” and states that the website has been reported for potential phishing. - External reputation results recorded 1 malicious detection and 1 suspicious detection; the domain is also recorded as present on an external blacklist. - The domain was registered in 2026 and is approximately 0.06 years old. - Archive history contains 2 snapshots spanning 2026–2026, with 1 year tracked. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured page contains no operator identity, legal entity, licensing statement, registration number, terms, or regulatory disclosure. This is a verification gap rather than a standalone determination of fraud, but it prevents confirmation that any regulated financial or exchange activity is authorized. The available third-party broker dataset produced no match, which provides no affirmative licensing or legitimacy conclusion. Evidence: - The captured homepage is a Cloudflare warning page and contains no legal, licensing, or corporate disclosure. - The observed page contains no functioning service, transaction flow, or regulated-product description from which authorization could be assessed. - The registration record lists NameMart Pte. Ltd. as registrar and Macaulay Cecil as the organization; independent identity verification remains incomplete. ### What to Verify Next The domain should remain outside login, credential, payment, wallet, and other sensitive workflows unless the warning is independently cleared. Any purported operator should be confirmed through an independently sourced corporate or regulatory registry, and the relevant organization should confirm the domain through an offline or previously established contact channel. Security teams should preserve the warning-page evidence and treat any later change in presentation as requiring a fresh assessment. Evidence: - The captured page returned a security block rather than an operating business interface. - The page contains no login form, sensitive form, or untrusted form destination. - The page requests that cookies be enabled before continuing, so a later browser state should not be treated as proof that the warning has been resolved. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is critically adverse, with a confirmed reputation contradiction and insufficiently verified operator identity. The site should be regarded as presenting a material risk to sensitive interactions rather than as an established financial service. ### Infrastructure Integrity The domain is delivered through Cloudflare CDN/WAF infrastructure, which provides an exposure-mitigation layer but does not establish the legitimacy of the underlying operator or content. All observed addresses were CDN edge infrastructure, and the origin was not observable in this analysis. ### Closing Assessment The domain should not be used for credentials, account access, financial transfers, or other sensitive activity; any legitimate business relationship should first be confirmed through an independently sourced channel and reassessed after the security warning is no longer present. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 6 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, page content, registration and ownership. ### 01 External reputation - A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 History in the web archive - The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`) ### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox - Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`) ### 05 Page content - The browser raised a warning while loading the page. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BROWSER_FLAGS_SUSPICIOUS`) ### 06 Registration and ownership - The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 25% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of cryptocexch.ink. - The request stayed on cryptocexch.ink. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under NameMart Pte. Ltd.. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-09-25. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-25. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | NameMart Pte. Ltd. | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3034::ac43:8d2e | | Name servers | odin.ns.cloudflare.com, princess.ns.cloudflare.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | WE1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-24 | | Domain age | 0.06 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-09-25 | | Archive first seen | 2026-09-25 | | Archive snapshots | 2 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about cryptocexch.ink at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [summitcapitalpatners.ink](https://trustsniffer.com/report/summitcapitalpatners.ink), another .ink site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [voidgame.ink](https://trustsniffer.com/report/voidgame.ink), another .ink site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [perfil.ink](https://trustsniffer.com/report/perfil.ink), another .ink site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [list-voteokx.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/list-voteokx.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [statusconfirmation.live](https://trustsniffer.com/report/statusconfirmation.live), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [trongas.shop](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trongas.shop), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100) - [xamportal.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xamportal.info), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [memecoin-drop.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/memecoin-drop.fun), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [trustwalletcards.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trustwalletcards.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [winearndrops.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/winearndrops.xyz), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer) - [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/cryptocexch.ink) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/cryptocexch.ink · assessed 2026-10-19.*