---
title: "Is dappsolana.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "dappsolana.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is dappsolana.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/dappsolana.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is dappsolana.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** dappsolana.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 10 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.1 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (10 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the dappsolana.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/dappsolana.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What dappsolana.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This site is a free-tier subdomain on Cloudflare's Pages hosting platform. Its name presents it as a Solana-themed decentralized-application (dApp) portal, which suggests a crypto front end of the kind used for wallet-based trading or token interaction. The analysis captured only a short protective challenge page. No product descriptions, yield or leverage claims, or company information could be observed, so the apparent purpose is inferred from the name and the sector it evokes.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This is the decisive section of the assessment. Multiple independent security engines currently classify the site as malicious, including two well-established enterprise-grade engines, and the combined detections are strong enough to count as a confirmed **blacklist** listing. The page that was captured carried a title announcing a suspected-phishing warning from the hosting platform, which is consistent with the external detections. Archive-side reputation records also associate the domain with known phishing activity. No conflicting legal entities and no confirmed brand impersonation were observed, so there is no identity contradiction. The risk comes from reputation and threat-listing evidence. The name "dappsolana" invokes the Solana ecosystem, and no evidence links the site to any official Solana project or foundation. Names of this kind on free subdomains are commonly used to lure users into wallet-connection or transaction-signing flows. The capture was blocked, so this remains an inference rather than an observed behavior. Because the page content could not be inspected, a more specific product-level risk analysis is not possible.


Evidence:
- Homepage: the captured page was a platform challenge page titled as a suspected-phishing notice, and the capture returned an access-denied status.
- Reputation: ten security engines flagged the domain as malicious and one as suspicious, including two tier-one vendors.
- Provenance: the domain is about 2.1 years old, and the web archive holds 10 snapshots spanning September 2024 to February 2025 (2 years tracked). This is a young, thin history with no established standing.
- Behavioral sandbox: the site made heavy third-party requests (19 external XHR calls and 5 external POSTs, with external traffic up to 94.9% on a page load) and produced 15 console errors. No wallet-connect prompts, drainer behavior, clipboard hijacking or hidden forms were recorded, but the page content was never fully rendered.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No legal, terms, privacy or about pages could be captured, so no corporate name, registration number, regulator or license could be associated with the site. Given the threat listing, no regulatory standing should be assumed. For a site offering crypto-asset services, the relevant authorizations (for example, virtual-asset service-provider registration or financial-services licensing in the operator's jurisdiction) would need to be demonstrated independently before any reliance. No third-party broker-reputation record matches this domain. That is neutral and cannot be read as a clearance. The site presents a standard domain-validated transport certificate, which proves only that the connection is encrypted, not who operates the site.


Evidence:
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (CLOUDFLARENET, Cloudflare, Inc., US), with ARIN as the registry.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate was issued by WE1 at domain-validation (DV) level and is valid to 2027-01-10.
- Legal and identity pages: none were available in the captured content, so no entity or licensing claims exist to assess.

### What to Verify Next

The site should not be used to establish anything about itself. Any need to reach a Solana application should be met by locating the project's official address through independently confirmed channels, such as the project's verified social accounts or documentation, and not through links or messages that led here. If this address arrived through a direct message, advertisement or social post, the sender should be treated as potentially compromised or malicious and the message reported. If the domain is expected to belong to a known organization, that organization should confirm through an offline or previously trusted route whether it operates this subdomain. Its security team can also check whether the account was compromised.


Evidence:
- Homepage: the platform warning title means the hosting provider's own screening has already questioned this address.
- Domain naming: the site sits on a shared free-hosting parent domain, so the name proves no affiliation with any named project.
- Behavioral sandbox: heavy outbound request volume means the loaded page may depend on externally supplied content that was not visible in the capture.

### Summary Verdict

The site is assessed as a high-risk property. Strong, converging external threat detections define the posture and outweigh every neutral or protective technical characteristic. Real-world operator identity is unverified, so no legitimacy should be inferred.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and web application firewall, and all four observed IP addresses are Cloudflare edge servers. The origin server was not observable, which limits independent verification of where the content is actually hosted. This protective infrastructure is a mitigating factor only, and it cannot offset the reputational risk. It also reduces visibility into any content changes behind the edge.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as unsafe for any sensitive activity. Do not log in, connect a wallet, sign transactions, enter seed phrases or credentials, or move funds. Passive viewing carries the lowest exposure, but even that is best avoided until independent threat-intelligence review shows the listings have been cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of dappsolana.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on dappsolana.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-09-01. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2cfd |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-01-10 |
| Domain age | 2.15 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-09-01 |
| Archive snapshots | 10 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 10 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about dappsolana.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [rewards-kucoin.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rewards-kucoin.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [migration-playzap-en.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/migration-playzap-en.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [migrate-mypaal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/migrate-mypaal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [site-7880365033-coinvaultsupport-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/site-7880365033-coinvaultsupport-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [uniswap-views.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-views.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [ledgerportal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ledgerportal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [oortech.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/oortech.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [moonbeam-portal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/moonbeam-portal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100)
- [neoclaimhub.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/neoclaimhub.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [votings-virtual.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/votings-virtual.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dappsolana.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/dappsolana.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-26.*
