---
title: "Is dehub-whitelist.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "dehub-whitelist.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is dehub-whitelist.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Review, 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/dehub-whitelist.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is dehub-whitelist.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** dehub-whitelist.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2.2 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (4 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the dehub-whitelist.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/dehub-whitelist.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What dehub-whitelist.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

DeHub is presented as a "decentralised entertainment hub": a single-page web application served from a free-hosting project subdomain, not from a dedicated branded domain. Its landing page carries a substantial amount of promotional text under the title "DeHub - The Decentralised Entertainment Hub". The "whitelist" wording in the hostname suggests an allow-list or early-access sign-up flow tied to a crypto or Web3 entertainment platform. Its apparent purpose is to enrol visitors in that ecosystem.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and weigh decisively against the site. Multiple independent reputation sources currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and this amounts to a confirmed **blacklist** listing. No conflicting legal identities and no explicit brand-impersonation finding were observed, and the page-level content checks raised no fraud indicators. The adverse reputation is therefore the controlling issue, and nothing in the infrastructure offsets it.

The site's behaviour adds secondary concern. During sandboxed visits it made a heavy volume of calls to external services, including several data submissions to destinations outside the expected set, and it produced a high rate of script errors. Neither pattern is conclusive alone. No wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, or content cloaking were observed. Even so, a wallet-themed "whitelist" landing page on a disposable-style subdomain with active threat flags matches the profile commonly used to harvest sign-ups or credentials.


Evidence:
- Domain provenance: registered ~2.2 years ago (about 792 days); the web archive holds only 4 snapshots, from 2024-08-25 to 2024-12-03 (about 1 year tracked), so the site has little independent history.
- Several major threat-intelligence sources currently rate the domain malicious or suspicious, which established the confirmed blacklist listing.
- On the homepage path, sandbox runs recorded 51 external XHR calls, 9 external POST requests (3 to non-whitelisted destinations), and 32 console errors. No wallet-connect, clipboard-write, or hidden-form behaviour was seen.
- No page-level fraud indicators and no conflicting legal entities were detected.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No regulatory registration or licence could be matched to this site, and no third-party regulator or broker record was found. The real-world operator behind "DeHub" is not independently confirmed, and ownership is opaque. This is a verification gap in its own right and is not by itself evidence of fraud. Here it compounds the reputational listing and leaves no verified operator to hold accountable. The third-party broker dataset returned no match, so there is no reputational context from that source.


Evidence:
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 at domain-validation (DV) level only, valid to 2026-12-31 (about 65 days remaining). This confirms an encrypted connection but does not vouch for the operator's identity.
- The homepage path presents the DeHub brand with no independently confirmed link to a named legal entity or registration.
- The DeFi-protocol directory check returned no listing for the project.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, confirm through DeHub's officially published channels, reached independently of this site, whether this hostname is a genuine allow-list or early-access page. A project-hosted subdomain should not be assumed official. The operator should be asked to name the legal entity behind the service, which can then be checked against the relevant corporate or financial registry. If the site is believed compromised or misused, the flagged detections should be reviewed with the hosting platform's abuse process before any further use.


Evidence:
- The hostname is a platform-hosted subdomain, not a dedicated brand domain.
- Reputation listings are active now and should be rechecked after any remediation claim.
- The homepage names no verifiable operator or registration.

### Summary Verdict

The site sits in a clearly elevated-risk posture. Confirmed adverse reputation, thin independent history, and an unverified operator outweigh its technically sound transport layer and stable page behaviour. The evidence supports treating it as unsafe for sensitive interaction. It does not support concluding that the project behind it is fraudulent.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is fronted by a major CDN and web application firewall, and every observed address is an edge node. The origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor for availability and basic hardening only. It does not establish legitimacy, and it limits independent verification of where the content is actually hosted, including how quickly it could be swapped.


### Closing Assessment

Visitors should limit interaction with this site to passive viewing. They should not connect wallets, sign messages, submit credentials or personal data, or make any payment through it. Any engagement with DeHub should go through channels confirmed independently of this page.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- A large share of what the page loaded came from other domains. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_MODERATE`)
- The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of dehub-whitelist.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on dehub-whitelist.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-08-25. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2edd |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-31 |
| Domain age | 2.17 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-08-25 |
| Archive snapshots | 4 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about dehub-whitelist.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [ghost-wallet.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ghost-wallet.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [rewards-paal-ai-6da.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rewards-paal-ai-6da.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [mantra-zone.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mantra-zone.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [fgfggreerferf.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fgfggreerferf.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 15/100)
- [blockdags-ef6.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/blockdags-ef6.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [dev-movequest.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dev-movequest.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [moonedge-earn.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/moonedge-earn.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [fixprotocol.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fixprotocol.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 15/100)
- [portal-moonshot-ifl.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-ifl.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [get-memecoins.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/get-memecoins.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dehub-whitelist.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/dehub-whitelist.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*