---
title: "Is dev-movequest.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 5/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "dev-movequest.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is dev-movequest.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100"
trust_score: 5
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/dev-movequest.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is dev-movequest.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** dev-movequest.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 1.9 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (11 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the dev-movequest.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/dev-movequest.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What dev-movequest.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This is a single-page website titled "Move Quest". It is served from a development-labelled subdomain on a free, shared page-hosting platform rather than from a standalone branded domain. A visitor receives a short front page, and the available evidence does not establish a product, service, or commercial model beyond that. The site's apparent purpose is therefore unconfirmed, and its development-style naming suggests a staging or prototype deployment rather than an established public business.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they decide this assessment. The site is **blacklisted**. Several independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag it as malicious, and a separate external blacklist listing corroborates them. Their convergence is the decisive factor, and the site's technical hygiene does not offset it. No conflicting legal identities and no confirmed brand impersonation were observed, and the major browser-safety service raised no flag. The risk therefore rests on the reputational listing, not on a demonstrated impersonation. The domain is also young, and its archived history is thin. Its operator has not been independently connected to any real-world person or organisation, so no accountable party stands behind the listing. Browser-behaviour testing found a heavy volume of calls to external services, including repeated outbound data submissions, and a notable number of script errors on the front page. All of these calls went to recognised destinations. The testing detected no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, credential forms posting off-site, cloaking, or fingerprinting. That absence of overt abuse mechanics narrows the concern, but it does not neutralise the active blacklisting. Evidence:

- Homepage reputation check: four threat-intelligence engines rated the site malicious and one rated it suspicious, alongside a separate external blacklist hit.
- Homepage behaviour test: 102 external XHR/fetch calls and 9 external POST requests, with up to 51% of traffic going to external hosts and 12 console errors. All external destinations were recognised, and no wallet, clipboard, hidden-form, or cloaking activity was recorded across 3 successful runs.
- Domain provenance: the domain is about 1.9 years old (695 days). The web archive holds 11 snapshots spanning November 2024 to March 2025 (2 years tracked), with no repurposing or content drift.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site presents no confirmed licensing, registration, or corporate-identity information, and its operator remains unverified. The platform-subdomain naming does not tie the site to any named legal entity. For this reason the site's apparent legitimacy cannot be assumed on the strength of what it displays. No third-party broker or regulatory database matched the site, so there is no external reputational record to weigh in either direction. The site's transport security is valid. It confirms an encrypted connection only, and says nothing about who operates the site or whether the operator is authorised to offer any service. Evidence:

- Hosting infrastructure: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-05.
- Broker and regulator lookup: no match found in the reputational dataset.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the operator's real-world identity should be established through channels independent of the site. This means checking whether any named company exists in the relevant corporate registry, and whether the entity holds a licence relevant to what the site eventually offers. If a "Move Quest" brand or product is claimed, its official domain should be confirmed through the project's verified public channels rather than through links on this page. It should also be confirmed that the development-labelled subdomain is an intended public property of that operator. The threat listing should be rechecked after the operator remediates, because a stale or resolved listing would change the picture. Any official support or contact channel should be confirmed through an independent route. Evidence:

- Homepage and domain naming: the site is hosted on a development-labelled subdomain of a shared hosting platform, with no named operator.
- Reputation status: the blacklist and malicious-detection status is current as of this assessment and should be rechecked later.
- Registry and brand checks: no registry match or official-brand link is available from the evidence to confirm the site's affiliation.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk. Active third-party threat detections, together with an unverified operator and a young, thinly documented web presence, put the site in the elevated-risk tier. The supportive technical signals are real but secondary, and they do not outweigh the reputational listing. Any sensitive use of the site is inadvisable until the detections are cleared and the operator is identified.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are edge nodes, so the origin server is not visible. This reduces direct exposure of the origin and is a mitigating factor only. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of the underlying host and can mask rapid content changes. Protective infrastructure cannot offset the current threat-intelligence detections.


### Closing Assessment

Account sign-in, credential entry, wallet connection, and any payment or financial interaction should be avoided entirely. At most, passive viewing is defensible, and only from a hardened or isolated browser environment. The site should be reassessed only after the operator is identified and the external detections are formally cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`)

### 02 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of dev-movequest.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on dev-movequest.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-11-25. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2cbe |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-05 |
| Domain age | 1.90 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2024-11-25 |
| Archive snapshots | 11 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about dev-movequest.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [giveaway-piggycoincom.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/giveaway-piggycoincom.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [uniswap-launchpads.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-launchpads.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [etfswappresales.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/etfswappresales.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100)
- [pimeru.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pimeru.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [hive-keychain.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/hive-keychain.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [p1inch.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/p1inch.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [zeta-x.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/zeta-x.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [flying-fse.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flying-fse.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-fmt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-fmt.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-eht.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-eht.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dev-movequest.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/dev-movequest.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-22.*