---
title: "Is dukz.lat a Scam? Trust Score 22/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "dukz.lat"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is dukz.lat a Scam? Risk Report, Score 22/100"
trust_score: 22
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/dukz.lat
assessed: 2026-10-19
---

# Is dukz.lat a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 22/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 22/100.** dukz.lat shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk

Assessed 2026-10-19 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | A promotional landing page for a pixel-art NFT collection called Dukz on Zcash, inviting visitors to join a whitelist and claim an NFT, with lore and gallery sections but no visible team, pricing, mint mechanics, or legal identity. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 26 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (2 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the dukz.lat homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/dukz.lat/screenshots/first.png)

_What dukz.lat served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-19. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

A single-page promotional site for "Dukz", a pixel-art NFT collection on the Zcash network. The homepage uses a retro terminal-style theme with navigation for Home, Gallery, Token, Lore, Whitelist and FAQ. Its main calls to action are "Join Whitelist" and "View Dukz", and its status counters read "Flock forming", "Early" and "Live". The apparent business model is a primary sale or allocation of NFTs through a whitelist and claim mechanism, with the ZEC token as the only crypto asset named.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The analysis found contradictory signals, so the posture is cautionary. The domain is **blacklisted** by an external threat-intelligence source, and one major security vendor flags it. Several further engines rate it suspicious, and the site is also associated with known phishing activity. Those detections are not attributed to a specific malicious behaviour. The homepage shows no credential forms, hidden forms, wallet-drainer behaviour, clipboard manipulation or cross-origin data posting. The listing therefore stands as an unexplained external warning, and the clean page behaviour does not offset it. The domain name also closely resembles an unrelated, established domain. No impersonation was confirmed, and no conflicting legal identities exist because the site names no legal entity at all. The homepage promotes a wallet-linked whitelist and claim flow while disclosing no mint price, supply, payment method, contract reference, team or refund terms. The "Signal 87%", "Block 084219" and "Unknown entity detected" counters are theatrical presentation with no verifiable meaning. A visitor who joins the whitelist or claims an NFT would be committing to an undefined transaction. The domain is also brand new, so there is no track record to weigh against the external warnings. Evidence:

- The homepage presents a whitelist and claim flow with no price, supply, payment method, mint mechanics, team or contact details.
- Domain registered 2026-09-23, about 26 days old (~0.07 years), with expiry set for 2027-09-23.
- Only 2 web-archive snapshots, both captured in 2026 (first 2026-09-23, last 2026-09-23), so no meaningful history exists.
- Behavioural testing across 3 runs recorded no external POSTs, no hidden forms and no wallet-connect activity on the homepage.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site makes no licensing or regulatory claim, and no legal, terms, privacy or about page was observed. Nothing identifies an operating company, a jurisdiction or a registration number. For a project that sells digital collectibles through wallet-linked claims, this absence leaves purchasers without refund terms, dispute routes or an accountable counterparty. These are disclosure gaps and do not prove wrongdoing on their own. They matter more here because the domain is blacklisted and has no history. No third-party broker or regulator profile matched this domain. The registrant is a named individual with no organisation attached, which is consistent with a small independent project but does not link the site to any accountable business. Evidence:

- The homepage, the only page observed, carries no terms, privacy policy, legal entity, licence or company registration details.
- Domain registered through PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com to an individual registrant with no organisation listed.
- Served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), with a DV TLS certificate issued by YE1 and valid to 2026-12-27.
- No regulator, broker-review or licence-registry match was found for the domain.

### What to Verify Next

The domain's external threat listing should be checked directly with the originating reputation source to see what it covers and whether the listing has been resolved. The project's identity should be confirmed through channels independent of this site, such as an established, long-standing social account or a recognised Zcash community source that links to this exact domain. Any official statement of mint terms (price, supply, payment currency and contract) should be obtained from such a source and not taken from the landing page. Wallet interactions should not be attempted until those terms exist in verifiable form. The team and the official support channels should also be confirmed through an independent route. Evidence:

- The homepage gives no mint price, supply, contract reference or refund terms to check against.
- The domain's age and its two archive captures offer no history that could substitute for independent confirmation.
- The site publishes no linked social profiles or external references that could be followed to cross-check the project.

### Summary Verdict

The site carries an elevated-risk posture. Confirmed external threat detections combine with a brand-new domain, no operator identity and an undefined wallet-linked sales mechanism. The clean on-page behaviour and valid encryption are real but secondary, and they cannot outweigh the external warnings. Legitimacy is not established, and the available evidence does not support treating the site as safe for sensitive or financial interaction.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is an edge node, so the true hosting origin is not visible. This is a mitigating factor only. It reflects standard protective hosting and says nothing about who operates the site. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of the hosting and would let content be swapped quickly. The only automated infrastructure flag is a young domain with few subdomains, which is an unconfirmed heuristic and not a confirmed risk.


### Closing Assessment

Use should be limited to passive, read-only viewing. Wallet connection, account login, credential entry and any payment or claim should be avoided until the external listing is resolved and the operator and sale terms are independently confirmed.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, page content.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)
- The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`)

### 03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 04 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)
- The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of dukz.lat.

- The request stayed on dukz.lat. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-23. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-23. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | PDR Ltd. d/b/a PublicDomainRegistry.com |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3034::ac43:a1ce |
| Name servers | ED.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, SHAZ.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-27 |
| Domain age | 0.07 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-23 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-23 |
| Archive snapshots | 2 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about dukz.lat at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [gage.lat](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gage.lat), another .lat site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [relayprotocol.lat](https://trustsniffer.com/report/relayprotocol.lat), another .lat site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [netnet.lat](https://trustsniffer.com/report/netnet.lat), another .lat site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [tg-podthesquire-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tg-podthesquire-com.pages.dev), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [ansdrops.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ansdrops.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 10/100)
- [xrp-bridge.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xrp-bridge.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [degenpad.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/degenpad.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [xrplswap.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xrplswap.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [spinso.sbs](https://trustsniffer.com/report/spinso.sbs), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 7/100)
- [trustwallet-begonia-038e52.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/trustwallet-begonia-038e52.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24)
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dukz.lat) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/dukz.lat · assessed 2026-10-19.*
