---
title: "Is eacc.meme Safe? Risk Report, Score 40/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "eacc.meme"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is eacc.meme Safe? Warning Signs, Score 40/100"
trust_score: 40
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/eacc.meme
assessed: 2026-10-21
---

# Is eacc.meme safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 40/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 40/100.** eacc.meme is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | A landing page for the 'e/acc SOL' Solana token. It shows a contract address, explorer and chart links, a 'Check Rewards Eligibility' prompt with no stated criteria, and a 'Not financial advice' disclaimer. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 1.9 years old (Registered history) | Clear |
| Web archive | Archived since 2024 (4 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the eacc.meme homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/eacc.meme/screenshots/first.png)

_What eacc.meme served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: 1 to 3 years (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2024.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

A single-page landing site for the "e/acc SOL" Solana meme token, themed around Effective Accelerationism. It shows a published token contract address with a copy button, links to a price chart, a blockchain explorer and a social profile, and a "Check Rewards Eligibility" prompt. The only stated purpose is promoting the token, and the implied business model is token trading or holding.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

This site carries a **confirmed external blacklist listing**. At least one reputation engine rates the domain malicious and another rates it suspicious. That is a hard contradiction and decisive for the risk posture. Infrastructure protections do not offset it. There is no evidence of phishing, no conflicting legal identities, and no confirmed impersonation. A name-similarity heuristic did flag resemblance to a major gaming brand's domain. The page content has nothing to do with that brand, so this is treated as a weak corroborating signal, not an established impersonation. The homepage's "Check Rewards Eligibility" call to action states no criteria, no reward type, no source of funds and no process. The page's own text makes unsupported claims, such as settlement on Solana being "compressed toward 150ms", and it lacks the documentation that would let a visitor evaluate them. This gap between claim and evidence is the main content-level fraud indicator. In crypto promotion, an undefined "eligibility" step is a common pattern for steering visitors toward wallet interactions or token purchases. Dynamic testing observed no wallet-connection prompt, login form, hidden form or cloaking. The page also carries a "Not financial advice" disclaimer and tells visitors to verify the mint. The current domain registration is only weeks old. Archive captures from late 2024 show the name existed earlier, so the present registration cannot be assumed to belong to the same operator as the earlier version. Evidence:

- Domain registered through Dynadot LLC. on 2026-09-26 (~0.07 years old), expiring 2027-09-26; the registrant details are incomplete.
- 4 archive snapshots, all captured between 2024-12-07 and 2024-12-14 (1 year tracked), all predating the current registration date.
- Homepage: the "Check Rewards Eligibility" prompt gives no criteria, and no team, project documentation or roadmap is presented.
- Dynamic testing: the homepage loaded cleanly in all three sandbox runs and showed no wallet-drainer, password-capture or redirect behaviour.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site is a single token page with no legal, terms, privacy, about or contact pages. It names no company, team or jurisdiction, and it claims no license or registration. Real-world ownership is **unverified**, and the registration data shows ownership opacity. This does not amount to a conflict between legal identities. A token promotion of this type would normally publish project documentation and the operator's identity, and the page offers neither. The page's sole self-protective statements are a generic "not financial advice" line and an instruction to verify the mint independently. The page's only contact route is the social profile link. No third-party broker or regulatory-database record was matched for the site. Evidence:

- Homepage: no named legal entity, license number, regulator reference or jurisdiction appears anywhere.
- Homepage: the only disclaimers are "Not financial advice" and "Verify the mint".
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE2 (DV, domain validation only, so it confirms control of the domain and nothing about the operator), valid to 2026-12-25.

### What to Verify Next

The mint address shown on the page should be compared against the token's official listing on the project's own channels and on an independent blockchain explorer. Any claim that the token is linked to a known project or community should be confirmed through channels reached independently, not through links on this page. Anyone considering the "rewards" prompt should obtain written criteria and the identity of whoever administers it before taking any action. The domain should also be rechecked after the blacklist listing is reviewed, to see whether the listing has been cleared or confirmed. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed through an independent route. Evidence:

- Homepage: the contract address, chart link and explorer link are the only verifiable artifacts and can be cross-checked on-chain.
- Homepage: the page publishes no rewards terms that can be checked against any external source.
- Domain history: the current registration is weeks old and the archive holds only a brief late-2024 capture window.

### Summary Verdict

The available evidence supports an **elevated-risk, clearly cautionary posture**. Confirmed adverse reputation from external sources outweighs the otherwise clean technical hygiene and the lack of overt phishing mechanics. The identity of whoever runs the site is not established. Legitimacy cannot be inferred from the presence of a working token page.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is a Cloudflare edge address. The origin server is not visible. That protection and the valid DV certificate are only mitigating factors. The edge-only view prevents independent verification of the real host and can mask rapid content changes. Neither limits the reputational listing, and neither says anything about who operates the site.


### Closing Assessment

This site should be treated as read-only reference material. No wallet connection, credential entry, payment or token purchase should be made on the basis of this page until the external listing is resolved and the project's identity is independently established.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, page content, registration and ownership.

### 01 Governance
- What the site offers, as described on its own pages, limits how high the score can go until more of it can be verified. (Governance `rule:gov_business_model_cap`)

### 02 External reputation
- A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`)

### 03 Page content
- The page appears to present itself as a known brand it is not verified to belong to. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BRAND_SUSPECTED`)
- The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME`)
- The page has no description for search engines, which established sites usually provide. (Page content `rule:PAGE_SEO_MISSING_META`)

### 04 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of eacc.meme.

- The request stayed on eacc.meme. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under Dynadot LLC.. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-26. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2024-12-07. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Dynadot LLC. |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3030::6815:5414 |
| Name servers | darwin.ns.cloudflare.com, kiki.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-25 |
| Domain age | 1.87 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-26 |
| Archive first seen | 2024-12-07 |
| Archive snapshots | 4 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about eacc.meme at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [ifinoid.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ifinoid.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 30/100)
- [ehamarkets.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ehamarkets.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [bumcoinc.site](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bumcoinc.site), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 26/100)
- [tradingengineers.in](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tradingengineers.in), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [tutpaste.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tutpaste.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [noxxclient.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/noxxclient.org), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 48/100)
- [delphiaonline.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/delphiaonline.top), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 25/100)
- [odinclient.st](https://trustsniffer.com/report/odinclient.st), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 41/100)
- [sigmaclient.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sigmaclient.org), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 32/100)
- [funnymap.org](https://trustsniffer.com/report/funnymap.org), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/eacc.meme) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/eacc.meme · assessed 2026-10-21.*