---
title: "Is eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Review, 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 70
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 70%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 15 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafe (Google) | Risk |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 91 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 4 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Google, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This is a Vercel-hosted web application on a subdomain whose name suggests an Ethereum-themed chat service. At analysis time its homepage returned only a "not found" error page with almost no readable text, so it presented no visible product, company, or service. Its apparent purpose could not be established from the captured content. The domain is recently created, and available evidence ties it to external security detections rather than to any legitimate, identifiable business.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and substantial. The site is **confirmed blacklisted**. A major browser safe-browsing service flags it for social engineering, the classification used for phishing and deceptive-credential pages. Many independent security engines also rate it malicious, including several top-tier vendors. These detections independently corroborate one another and are the decisive factor in this assessment. Behavioral testing adds to the concern: after simulated user interaction, the page's content and appearance changed materially from what was first served. This is a strong cloaking pattern, in which a page shows one thing to a scanner or first-time visitor and another once engaged. It is a technique commonly used to hide credential-harvesting or wallet-related lures. The page also made a very heavy volume of outbound requests, including a dozen external data submissions, with nearly all page activity directed off-site. All of those destinations were recognised, non-suspicious services, and no wallet-drainer, hidden-form, or external password-form behavior was observed. A clipboard write was detected, but no clipboard hijacking was confirmed. The roughly ninety abuse reports on the network address were attributed to a shared content-delivery address used by many unrelated customers. They were therefore discounted and are not treated as evidence against this site. No conflicting legal identities were found, and brand impersonation is not confirmed. The risk rests on the confirmed threat listings and the cloaking behavior. Evidence:

- Homepage: returned a "not found" error with minimal text, yet content shifted noticeably after interaction (strong cloaking, post-interaction).
- Reputation: flagged by the browser safe-browsing service for social engineering. 15 engines rated it malicious and 1 suspicious, including 4 tier-1 vendors.
- Behavioral testing: 70 external XHR/fetch calls and 12 external POSTs across 3 successful runs, all to whitelisted destinations.
- Provenance: domain registered in 2026 (~0.36 years old), with 1 archive snapshot (first and last seen 2026-06-16, 1 year tracked).

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page contains no terms, privacy policy, about page, company name, registration number, or license, so no regulatory or corporate status can be assessed from the site. Operator identity is not verified, and the site shows signs of ownership and governance opacity. Because only an error page was captured, this is a lack of verifiable disclosure, not evidence of any specific licensing violation. No third-party broker or regulator-style reputation entry matched this site. Hosting is on a mainstream cloud network with a valid but entry-level certificate, which establishes only basic transport security, not identity or legitimacy. Evidence:

- Homepage: no legal entity, license, or registration disclosure in the captured content.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1, domain-validated (DV) only, valid to 2026-11-27 (32 days remaining).

### What to Verify Next

Credentials, wallet connections, and payments should not be attempted until the site's operator is independently identified and the security listings are formally cleared. Any party who sent a link to this site should be contacted through a separate, independently known channel to confirm the link was legitimately issued. If the site is claimed to belong to a known organization, its official domain should be confirmed from that organization's own published materials, and the claim should be compared against this address. Security teams should also confirm whether the listings are later removed and whether the site stably serves consistent content. Evidence:

- Homepage: the captured page presents no identifiable operator, so any claimed affiliation cannot be tested on-site.
- Reputation: the safe-browsing and multi-engine detections were active at analysis time.
- Behavior: the content change after interaction needs re-testing to determine whether it persists.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk. Confirmed multi-source threat detections, combined with deceptive-behavior indicators and an unverified operator on a very young domain, outweigh the basic technical hygiene the site shows. The evidence does not support treating this site as legitimate or safe for sensitive interaction.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through a trusted cloud and content-delivery platform on a major US hosting network. All observed addresses are shared edge servers, and the true origin server was not observable. This provides baseline availability and transport protection and is a mitigating factor only. Edge-only visibility prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content swaps, so it cannot offset the reputation risk established above.


### Closing Assessment

Do not log in, connect a wallet, sign transactions, enter personal data, or make any payment on this site. Do not download or run anything it offers. At most, treat it as a read-only item for security review, and report it to the appropriate abuse channel if it was received through an unsolicited message.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, hosting and network, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)

### 04 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered between three and six months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_YOUNG_6M`)

### 05 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 91 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.195 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app.

- The request stayed on eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-06-16. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.195 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 8 |
| Edge IP addresses | 8 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | 0.36 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-06-16 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 15 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 91 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 1 match |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [xmagnetics.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xmagnetics.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [tron-risk-check.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tron-risk-check.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [mintest-phi.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mintest-phi.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 4/100)
- [claim-noderzz-s1.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/claim-noderzz-s1.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [send-secure-trustwallet-usdt-bip20.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/send-secure-trustwallet-usdt-bip20.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [mmmm-sepia-nine.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/mmmm-sepia-nine.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [u-lovat-six.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/u-lovat-six.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [stusdt-swap.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/stusdt-swap.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [2oceans.fr](https://trustsniffer.com/report/2oceans.fr), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [2ms.pt](https://trustsniffer.com/report/2ms.pt), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/eth-chat-sigma.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-26.*