---
title: "Is etherconfig.netlify.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "etherconfig.netlify.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is etherconfig.netlify.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/etherconfig.netlify.app
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is etherconfig.netlify.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** etherconfig.netlify.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 16 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 2 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the etherconfig.netlify.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/etherconfig.netlify.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What etherconfig.netlify.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a subdomain on a public application-hosting platform whose name suggests an Ethereum or crypto-configuration utility. When captured, its homepage returned a "site not found" notice with only a few hundred characters of text and no visible product, brand, or service description. Its apparent purpose could not be established from the content. The page nonetheless exhibited active behaviour in a monitored browser session, as set out below.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they are serious. Multiple independent security engines classify the site as malicious, including several tier-one security vendors, and the aggregate detection level is high enough to be treated as a confirmed **blacklist** condition. This is the decisive finding and outweighs every neutral or mitigating technical attribute. No conflicting legal identities or confirmed brand impersonation were observed. However, the domain's crypto-flavoured naming on a freely registrable platform subdomain is a pattern commonly exploited to stage lures that mimic wallet or configuration tools. In three of three monitored sessions, the homepage contained hidden form elements and password-input forms, even though the visible content is only an error notice. A page that shows no interface but carries concealed credential-capable forms is a recognised staging pattern for credential harvesting. The page also produced very large DOM mutations after interaction, issued heavy cross-origin request and POST activity, and logged script console errors. No wallet-connection, clipboard-hijacking, or fingerprinting behaviour was detected, and no cloaking was observed. Evidence:

- Homepage, threat intelligence: sixteen security engines rated the site malicious and one rated it suspicious. Three tier-one vendors were among those flagging it, and an external blacklist condition is active.
- Homepage, sandbox: hidden forms were detected in 3 of 3 runs, alongside 3 password-form detections, while the visible page text is a 368-character "Site not found" notice.
- Homepage, sandbox: 4,070 DOM mutations after interaction, 36 external network requests (15 XHR/fetch, 21 POSTs), and 3 console errors, all to whitelisted destinations.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The captured page carries no legal entity name, licence or registration reference, terms, privacy policy, or contact route. That is a content gap, though not by itself evidence of wrongdoing. The real-world operator is not independently verified, and nothing on the site allows the domain to be tied to a known brand or person. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists for the site, and the absence of one is neutral. Only platform-level assurances exist, and these attach to the hosting service rather than the site's operator. The certificate's subject organisation is the hosting platform, not the site owner, so transport encryption confirms only a secure channel to the platform. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator name, company registration, licence number, or contact details on the captured page.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 (OV), subject organisation Netlify, Inc, valid to 2027-03-19.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US).

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the operator should be identified through channels independent of this site. Anyone referred here by a message, advertisement, or social post should trace the referral back to its source, confirm through an official offline route that the organisation actually uses this address, and confirm the official contact channels. A legitimate project would publish its domain on a verified official profile, so this address should be compared against it. The site's owner could also be asked to demonstrate control and to clarify what the page is meant to serve. Evidence:

- Homepage: no stated purpose, operator, or service beyond the "site not found" notice.
- Threat intelligence: no benign explanation for the engine detections is supplied by the site.

### Summary Verdict

The deterministic assessment is critical. Confirmed external threat detections combine with concealed credential-capable form behaviour on a page that shows no legitimate function, and infrastructure protections cannot offset that reputational weight. The evidence supports a clearly cautionary, high-risk posture, and operator identity remains unverified.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind AWS-based edge infrastructure, with four edge addresses observed and no origin address visible, so independent verification of the underlying host is not possible. This edge-only visibility can also mask rapid content swaps. The two abuse reports recorded against one of the edge addresses relate to shared provider infrastructure with no confidence attached, and they are discounted for that reason. Protective hosting is a mitigating factor only, and it does not offset the detections or the form behaviour.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as unsafe for any interaction beyond passive, read-only viewing in an isolated environment. No credentials should be entered, no wallet should be connected, and no payment or financial action should be taken. Anyone who has already submitted credentials or approvals here should change the affected passwords and revoke any granted permissions.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page contained a form a visitor cannot see. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_HIDDEN_FORMS`)
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 2 reports on hosting IP 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 (Amazon Data Services Ireland Ltd, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of etherconfig.netlify.app.

- The request stayed on etherconfig.netlify.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-08-31. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2a05:d014:58f:6200::259 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (aws) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | DigiCert Global G2 TLS RSA SHA256 2020 CA1 |
| SSL expiry | 2027-03-19 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | 2026-08-31 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 16 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 2 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about etherconfig.netlify.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [crypto-s8t.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-s8t.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-psg.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-psg.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [pump-voting-wqg.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-voting-wqg.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-jnt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-jnt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-lrt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-mqt.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-mqt.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [robinhood-main-dex-uwx.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/robinhood-main-dex-uwx.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [coinmarketcap-votev421.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coinmarketcap-votev421.netlify.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [micstndasap.world](https://trustsniffer.com/report/micstndasap.world), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [gitrm.cfd](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gitrm.cfd), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/etherconfig.netlify.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/etherconfig.netlify.app · assessed 2026-10-26.*