--- title: "Is everstake-page.github.io a Scam? Trust Score 5/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "everstake-page.github.io" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is everstake-page.github.io a Scam? Risk Report, Score 5/100" trust_score: 5 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/everstake-page.github.io assessed: 2026-10-26 --- # Is everstake-page.github.io a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 5/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 5/100.** everstake-page.github.io shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 10 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 12% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 9 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR1) | Noted | | Hosted by | FASTLY (Server in US) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the everstake-page.github.io homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/everstake-page.github.io/screenshots/first.png) _What everstake-page.github.io served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Security Alert Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution. This is a single-page website published under a free-hosted subdomain on a public code-hosting pages platform. Its page title is simply "Everstake", which matches the name of a well-known staking brand. The page carries roughly six thousand characters of text and loads normally. Its apparent purpose is to present itself as a branded crypto-staking or Web3 landing page. Automated page-content interpretation was unavailable, so the specific products, yields and claims it makes were not extracted. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk The evidence converges on a seriously adverse reputation. The site is **blacklisted** by multiple independent threat-intelligence sources. Roughly ten engines flag it as malicious and one more as suspicious. Two tier-one security vendors are among those flagging it. That volume of detections triggered a hard score ceiling, and no positive signal can offset it. The deployment pattern adds to the concern. A brand-style label ("everstake-page") on a free, shared subdomain of a public hosting platform is a common way to stage lookalike pages. The domain also closely resembles the hosting platform's own name. No conflicting legal identities were found. No explicit brand-impersonation finding was confirmed in the page analysis either. Even so, the combination of a brand-like title, free hosting and strong malicious detections is the classic profile of a deceptive or compromised crypto-themed page. Reports of abusive activity were also logged against a shared address used by the hosting platform's content-delivery network. Because that address serves many unrelated sites, those reports are weak evidence about this site and are treated only as background context. The behavioural sandbox found no external data calls, no wallet-connection or drainer routines, no clipboard manipulation and no hidden or external-posting forms across three runs. This lowers the likelihood of an active in-page exploit during the observed sessions, but it does not neutralise the independent malicious detections. Detections of this kind commonly relate to content that can change or redirect later. Evidence: - Homepage and domain reputation: about ten engines rate the site malicious and one suspicious. Two tier-one vendors, Fortinet and Sophos, are among them. - Hosting-address history: 9 abuse reports, with a low confidence score of 12, on a shared content-delivery address. These apply to shared provider infrastructure, not specifically to this site. - Homepage behaviour: three successful sandbox runs showed zero external requests, no wallet-connect activity, no clipboard writes and no hidden forms. - Domain naming: the brand-style label sits on a shared hosting subdomain and closely resembles the hosting platform's own name. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The captured page gave no usable basis to establish the operator's identity, any licensing, or any registered corporate entity. Page analysis for identity was unavailable, so real-world identity remains unverified. Governance and ownership are opaque. No third-party broker or regulator database matched the site, which is a neutral signal and not a licensing verdict. This is a disclosure and verification gap. By itself it is not evidence of fraud, but here it compounds the reputational findings and removes any accountable party the reader could hold to the brand the page presents. The technical baseline is ordinary and gives no reassurance about the operator. Transport encryption is valid and issued by a recognised authority at the domain-validation level, which confirms only control of the hostname. Evidence: - Homepage: the page was captured successfully, but no operator identity, legal entity or licence information could be established. - Third-party broker database: no match found, so no external reputational context on a regulated-entity claim is available. - Hosting: served from AS54113 (Fastly, US), with address records resolving normally. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YR1 (DV), valid to 2026-12-29 (64 days remaining). ### What to Verify Next Before any engagement, the connection between this page and any genuine staking provider of the same name should be tested independently. The page should not be used to establish it. This means reaching the genuine provider through channels obtained independently of this site, such as an offline directory, a regulator register or a known official channel. The aim is to confirm whether this address is an authorised property of that provider. Any claim of regulation or licensing should be checked directly in the relevant registry. Official contact channels should also be confirmed through an independent route. If the site was reached through a link, message or advert, the sender should be treated as suspect and the source examined. A site owner or security team who finds their own content here should check the repository and hosting account for compromise. Evidence: - Homepage: the brand-style title and subdomain are the only identity cues observed, and neither can be relied on without independent confirmation. - Domain registration: the address sits on a shared platform's namespace, so ownership is bound to an account on that platform and not to a registered domain. - Threat-intelligence results: the malicious detections give a concrete reason to confirm provenance before any interaction. ### Summary Verdict The site presents an elevated-risk posture. Strong, converging malicious detections from independent sources outweigh the ordinary technical hygiene observed. The real-world operator and any connection to the brand it displays remain unestablished. The site is not suitable for any sensitive interaction. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is delivered through Fastly's content-delivery and web-application-firewall network, and all observed addresses are edge servers. The origin server is not visible, so the actual hosting could not be independently checked. This visibility limit can also conceal rapid content swaps. The infrastructure is established and reputable, and the certificate is valid, so this is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the reputational findings and does not show the content is legitimate. ### Closing Assessment The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial transaction. Nothing should be downloaded from it. Any visit should be limited to passive viewing from an isolated, non-production environment. Anyone who has already interacted with it should treat credentials and wallets as exposed and rotate or secure them. The matter should be reported to the hosting platform's abuse channel. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by governance, external reputation, registration and ownership. ### 01 Governance - A threat feed lists this domain as malicious, and that caps the score whatever the other checks found. (Governance `rule:GOV_CRITICAL_BLACKLIST`) ### 02 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 03 Registration and ownership - The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 9 reports on hosting IP 2606:50c0:8000::153 (GitHub, Inc., Content Delivery Network), 12% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNKNOWN | | Identity score | 50/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 30% | - AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified) _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of everstake-page.github.io. - The request stayed on everstake-page.github.io. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - It is hosted on FASTLY, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Not available | | Hosting | FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:50c0:8000::153 | | Name servers | Not available | | CDN / edge network | Detected (fastly) | | Resolved IP addresses | 8 | | Edge IP addresses | 8 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YR1 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-29 | | Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) | | Domain expiry | Not available | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 10 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 12% confidence, 9 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about everstake-page.github.io at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [sammygeemints082.github.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sammygeemints082.github.io), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [flashsd.github.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flashsd.github.io), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [donutsmp-mod.github.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/donutsmp-mod.github.io), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [rocket-pool-site.github.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rocket-pool-site.github.io), a similar name (Moderate Trust, 58/100) - [github.blog](https://trustsniffer.com/report/github.blog), same name on .blog (High Trust, 94/100) - [github.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/github.com), same name on .com (High Trust, 100/100) - [dexbank.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dexbank.io), another .io site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [coinsim.io](https://trustsniffer.com/report/coinsim.io), another .io site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [aml-boot.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-boot.vercel.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [resl0vedexxxiceiy.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/resl0vedexxxiceiy.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 3/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) - [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/everstake-page.github.io) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/everstake-page.github.io · assessed 2026-10-26.*