---
title: "Is evm-1006.vercel.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "evm-1006.vercel.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is evm-1006.vercel.app a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/evm-1006.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-26
---

# Is evm-1006.vercel.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** evm-1006.vercel.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-26 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 90 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |
| Hosted by | AMAZON-02 (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the evm-1006.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/evm-1006.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What evm-1006.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-26. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This is a minimal single-page site served from a subdomain of a public application-hosting platform. Its homepage carries the generic title "Example Page" and only a short block of text. It presents no recognizable brand, product catalogue or stated business model, so its apparent purpose is a placeholder, test deployment or unidentified web application. Behavioral testing recorded stable page loads but also outbound activity to third-party destinations.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and the site is **blacklisted** on that basis. This is the decisive factor in the assessment, and the platform's protections and the valid encryption cannot offset it. No brand impersonation, conflicting legal identities or phishing-form behavior were observed on the page itself. The page also showed no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms or content cloaking, so the specific harm the flags point to is unconfirmed. A large volume of abuse reports is attached to the shared hosting address the site resolves to. Those reports apply to a provider-level address used by many tenants and are discounted. They are not evidence against this site. During interaction testing, a high share of the site's network requests went to external destinations, and some of those were data submissions (POST requests) to unrecognized third-party endpoints. Combined with the blacklist listing, this raises the risk that data entered on the page could leave the site unseen. Evidence:

- Homepage: titled "Example Page" with a short text body and no identifiable brand, operator or offering.
- Reputation checks: several independent threat-intelligence sources report the domain as malicious or suspicious, and an external blacklist flag is set.
- Behavioral sandbox (3 of 3 runs completed): 4 external XHR/fetch calls and 2 POSTs to non-whitelisted destinations, with up to 71.4% of observed activity external and 8 console errors.
- Hosting address: 90 abuse reports are attached to the shared provider IP 64.29.17.67 (Vercel). These are discounted as shared-infrastructure noise.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The homepage discloses no operating company, legal or terms pages, licensing or registration details, or contact channels. The captured content is too thin to support any regulatory or identity assessment, so the real-world operator is unidentified. This is a content gap and not a contradiction. No third-party broker or regulator listing matched the domain, so there is no external regulatory signal in either direction. Ownership opacity is present. Because the site sits on a shared platform subdomain, there is no independent domain-level identity to anchor it to a named entity. Evidence:

- Homepage: roughly 800 characters of text, with no company name, address, license number or legal notice.
- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02, Amazon.com, Inc., US), registry ARIN, on a Vercel-platform subdomain.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR1 at DV (domain-validated) level, valid to 2026-11-27. DV confirms only control of the domain, not the operator's identity.

### What to Verify Next

Before any engagement, the site's operator and purpose need independent confirmation. A party that directed the user to this address should be contacted through a separate, trusted channel, such as a known phone number or an official corporate website, to confirm that the address is intentional and legitimate. The user should check whether the claimed organization publishes this address on its own verified properties. Any company or licensing claims must be confirmed directly with the relevant registry, since the site makes none. The threat-intelligence listings should be rechecked later in case the flags are cleared or the site is cleaned. Evidence:

- Homepage: no stated operator, so identity can only be established outside the site.
- Reputation listings: current at the time of analysis and subject to change if the owner remediates.
- Outbound requests: external POST destinations were observed and were not recognized as established service providers.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Active malicious and suspicious detections by independent sources outweigh the technically well-formed delivery of the page. The operator remains unidentified, and the site offers no content that would support legitimacy. It is therefore treated as unsuitable for sensitive interactions.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through an established, trusted edge provider on Amazon-hosted address space, and the transport certificate is valid. All observed addresses are edge servers, and the origin server was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only: it limits direct exposure of the backend but does not establish the operator's legitimacy. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of the hosting and can mask rapid content swaps. It does not offset the external threat detections.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be limited to read-only viewing at most. No login, credential entry, personal data submission, payment or wallet connection should occur on it unless the operator is independently confirmed and the reputation flags are cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-26 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The page sent data to a destination TrustSniffer does not recognise. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_NONWHITELISTED_POSTS`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 90 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.67 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of evm-1006.vercel.app.

- The request stayed on evm-1006.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.67 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 90 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about evm-1006.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [click-to-enjoy.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-to-enjoy.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [click-bnb-to-click.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-bnb-to-click.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [breadcat-fi-q50.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/breadcat-fi-q50.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [arbitrumdefender.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/arbitrumdefender.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [btrace-aml.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/btrace-aml.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [howcheckaml.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/howcheckaml.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [aml-boot.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aml-boot.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [flux-swap.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flux-swap.vercel.app), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [checker-hyperfoundation.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/checker-hyperfoundation.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [swap-byreal.net](https://trustsniffer.com/report/swap-byreal.net), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)
- [Connect a Wallet to a Scam Site: What Happens](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/connect-wallet-to-a-scam-site-what-happens)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/evm-1006.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/evm-1006.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-26.*