---
title: "Is faucetdapps.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 17/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "faucetdapps.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is faucetdapps.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 17/100"
trust_score: 17
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/faucetdapps.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-27
---

# Is faucetdapps.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 17/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 17/100.** faucetdapps.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-27 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 2 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the faucetdapps.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/faucetdapps.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What faucetdapps.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-27. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This site is a single-page web application served from a free subdomain on a public static-hosting platform, titled "BLOCKCHAIN - Secure Multi-Chain Wallet Resolution Protocol" and branded around "faucet dapps". It presents itself as a blockchain utility, a multi-chain wallet resolution protocol, in the faucet and decentralized-application category. The homepage carries a modest amount of text and a large number of interactive elements, and its apparent purpose is to draw visitors into wallet-related or form-driven interactions. The page content does not establish a named operator or a concrete business model.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and they drive the cautionary posture of this report. The domain is **currently blacklisted**: more than one independent reputation source flags it. Multiple security engines classify it as malicious, and a further engine marks it suspicious. This is a confirmed adverse reputation finding, not a soft warning. No conflicting legal identities, brand impersonation, or phishing page were confirmed in the content analysis. The site's naming and title do, however, pair generic blockchain and "wallet resolution" language with a free hosting subdomain, a pattern common among disposable crypto lure pages. The homepage contained six forms that post to external destinations. Interaction produced very large DOM rewrites, with thousands of mutations after interaction, and nine browser console errors. Together these show a heavily script-driven page whose visible content changes sharply once a visitor engages, and such pages can swap content quickly. In sandbox runs the page made no external network calls, showed no wallet-connection prompts, and showed no clipboard manipulation or cloaking. The risk therefore rests mainly on the third-party detections and the form and DOM behaviour, not on observed credential-theft or wallet-draining activity. Evidence:

- Homepage: the page is titled as a "secure multi-chain wallet resolution protocol" but names no operator and gives no product detail beyond that generic claim.
- Homepage behaviour: six forms that post to external destinations were detected, and DOM mutations numbered 4,752 after interaction.
- Sandbox runs: all three runs completed, with 9 console errors and no external network requests, wallet-connection attempts, or clipboard writes.
- Reputation checks: two engines rated the domain malicious and one suspicious, and a blacklist hit is confirmed across two sources.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The analysis found no licensing, registration, or regulatory disclosure on the captured homepage. The site offers no legal, terms, or about content that would let a reader tie it to an accountable entity. Independent verification of the operator's identity was not achieved. Any claim of legitimacy made by the page therefore stands unsupported and cannot be treated as established. The site is not linked to any third-party regulated-entity record, and no broker-reputation match was found. This absence is a verification limit and does not by itself indicate fraud. Given the adverse reputation findings above, it removes any offsetting assurance. Basic transport security is in place but is not a marker of legitimacy. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, licence, registration number, or jurisdiction is presented.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE2 at DV (domain-validated) level, valid to 2026-12-13 (47 days remaining).
- Third-party reputation: no broker-intelligence match for the domain.

### What to Verify Next

Verification should start with the adverse reputation findings. They should be re-checked directly against the relevant security-intelligence sources, and the site should be treated as unsafe until they are resolved or retracted. Anyone claiming an association with this "protocol" should be asked for a verifiable corporate identity, a registered project name, and published, independently audited code or contract addresses. These should be confirmed through channels that do not rely on links from this site. The legitimacy of the project should be confirmed through an independent, offline route, and the official support and contact channels should be confirmed that way as well. Any wallet addresses or contract references should be checked against a public block explorer before any interaction. Evidence:

- Homepage: no contract addresses, audit reports, or team details are offered for checking.
- Homepage: the external-posting forms mean any data entered could leave the site, so their destinations should be inspected before any input.
- Reputation: the confirmed detections are the primary open item and carry the highest priority.

### Summary Verdict

The site sits in a clearly elevated-risk posture. Confirmed adverse reputation findings combine with the absence of any verifiable operator identity, and neither is offset by the site's technical hygiene. The evidence supports treating the site as a high-risk, sensitive-interaction hazard until the detections are cleared.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served entirely through Cloudflare edge infrastructure with a valid certificate, and all observed addresses are CDN edge nodes. The origin host was not observable. This is a mitigating factor only: it shows competent delivery and no evidence of unusual DNS behaviour, but it cannot offset the reputation findings. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent verification of the true host and can mask rapid content swaps.


### Closing Assessment

Use should be limited to read-only viewing. No login, credential entry, form submission, wallet connection, or financial transaction should be attempted on this site, and nothing should be downloaded from it. Further engagement should wait until the security detections are cleared and an accountable operator is independently verified.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-27 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page replaced a large part of its own content after loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_CHANGE_HIGH`)
- The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`)
- The page rewrote itself after it was interacted with, so what a visitor first sees is not what they end up on. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DIFF_AFTER_INTERACTION`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of faucetdapps.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on faucetdapps.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2faa |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-13 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 2 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about faucetdapps.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [ghost-holding.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ghost-holding.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [worldlibirty-4la.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/worldlibirty-4la.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [based-bet.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/based-bet.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [bitcoininu.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitcoininu.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 23/100)
- [rewards-kucoin.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rewards-kucoin.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [migration-playzap-en.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/migration-playzap-en.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [migrate-mypaal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/migrate-mypaal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [site-7880365033-coinvaultsupport-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/site-7880365033-coinvaultsupport-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [portal-moonshot-7hc.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-7hc.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [nextepochmarket.cc](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nextepochmarket.cc), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/faucetdapps.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/faucetdapps.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-27.*