---
title: "Is firelight-voting-allocations.web.app a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "firelight-voting-allocations.web.app"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is firelight-voting-allocations.web.app a Scam? Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/firelight-voting-allocations.web.app
assessed: 2026-10-22
---

# Is firelight-voting-allocations.web.app a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** firelight-voting-allocations.web.app shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-22 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 4 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 3% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 4 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR4) | Noted |
| Hosted by | FASTLY (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the firelight-voting-allocations.web.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/firelight-voting-allocations.web.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What firelight-voting-allocations.web.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-22. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a single-page web application titled "Firelight Voting – Phase 2 Voting is live." It runs on a shared web.app subdomain rather than an independently branded domain. Its visitor-facing content is a short campaign-style page, with roughly three thousand characters of text, that presents a voting round and an allocation theme. The apparent purpose is to draw visitors into a time-limited participation event. The page does not clearly state who operates it or what the participation leads to.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site shows **confirmed contradictory signals**. Several independent reputation engines flag the site as malicious, with one more rating it suspicious. This places it on a third-party blacklist, and that alone is decisive for the risk posture. The campaign-style naming ("voting", "allocations", "Phase 2 is live") matches a familiar urgency lure, where visitors are pushed to act in a staged event. The captured content is too thin to confirm which lure, if any, is behind it. No conflicting legal identities, brand impersonation or published phishing page were established, so the concern rests on the blacklist evidence and not on a proven impersonation. A separate set of abuse reports exists against a provider-owned edge address serving the site. Those reports attach to a shared content-delivery address used by many tenants, so they say little about this site specifically and are weighed as a minor corroborating signal only. The behavioral review found no wallet-connection prompts, no wallet-draining routines, no clipboard manipulation, no hidden forms, no credential posts to external hosts and no content cloaking. These are mitigating observations, but they do not offset the external threat detections. The site was captured at a single point in time, and a page can change content after capture. Evidence:

- Homepage: titled "Firelight Voting – Phase 2 Voting is live," a staged-event framing with no identified operator.
- Reputation checks: four engines rate the domain malicious and one suspicious, which constitutes a confirmed blacklist hit.
- Shared edge address 2620:0:890::100: four abuse reports, attributed to shared provider infrastructure and not discounted.
- Behavioral review (three runs): 27 external requests and 10 external posts, none to non-whitelisted hosts. No wallet, clipboard or hidden-form activity was recorded, but 13 console errors were logged.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site does not make it clear who operates it. Disclosure is unclear, and the homepage shows no legal entity, licence or registration reference. Because the site presents a voting and allocation mechanism, any financial or token-related function would normally warrant a visible operator and regulatory standing. The site is not matched in any third-party broker-reputation dataset, so no broker-level signal is available either way. The missing disclosure is a verification gap and not proof of wrongdoing. Real-world identity connection remains **unverified**. Transport security is in place, but a domain-validated certificate confirms only control of the hostname, not the identity of the operator. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator name, legal entity, licence or registration number in the captured content.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WR4 (DV), valid to 2026-12-22.
- Hosting: served from AS54113 (FASTLY – Fastly, Inc., US).
- Third-party broker dataset: no match.

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction, confirm independently that a "Firelight" voting or allocation programme exists. Use the official channels of the claimed project, reached through an offline or independently sourced route and not through links on this page. Check that the project publicly announces this exact web address. If any licence or regulatory standing is claimed, confirm it directly with the relevant registry. Also confirm the official support and contact channels through an independent route. Re-test the site later, as its reputation status and content may change. Evidence:

- Homepage: the "Phase 2 voting" claim has no attributable announcement or operator on the page.
- Reputation checks: the blacklist status is current as of this assessment and should be re-checked before any engagement.
- Behavioral review: no external credential posts were observed, but the capture covers only the landing state.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is **high-risk**. Confirmed external threat detections decide the assessment, and the unverified operator identity and lack of attributable ownership leave nothing that could offset them. Technically sound transport security and clean on-page behavior in the sandbox do not change this classification. The site should be treated as a hostile or potentially deceptive destination until the detections are cleared.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through a recognised content-delivery and edge-security provider, and its observed addresses are all edge nodes. This is a mitigating factor only, as it indicates mainstream delivery and a valid certificate chain. It cannot offset the reputation findings. The origin server was not observable, so hosting cannot be independently verified, and content could be swapped quickly behind the edge without any visible infrastructure change.


### Closing Assessment

Use should be limited to passive viewing. Do not log in, connect a wallet, enter credentials, make payments or take any financial action on this site.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-22 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, registration and ownership, behaviour in a sandbox.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

### 03 Behaviour in a sandbox
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)
- The page sent data to other domains many times while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_POSTS_HEAVY`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 4 reports on hosting IP 2620:0:890::100 (Google LLC, Content Delivery Network), 3% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of firelight-voting-allocations.web.app.

- The request stayed on firelight-voting-allocations.web.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on FASTLY, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | FASTLY - Fastly, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2620:0:890::100 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (fastly) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 2 |
| Edge IP addresses | 2 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR4 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-22 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 4 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 3% confidence, 4 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about firelight-voting-allocations.web.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [wallet-click-tow.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/wallet-click-tow.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [himans-singh.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/himans-singh.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [click-to-enjoy.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-to-enjoy.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [click-bnb-to-click.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/click-bnb-to-click.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [breadcat-fi-q50.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/breadcat-fi-q50.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [apps-solana.web.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/apps-solana.web.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 10/100)
- [arbitrumdefender.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/arbitrumdefender.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [btrace-aml.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/btrace-aml.vercel.app), another .app site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 21/100)
- [aaniqtyrxr.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aaniqtyrxr.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [rideofy.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rideofy.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/firelight-voting-allocations.web.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/firelight-voting-allocations.web.app · assessed 2026-10-22.*