---
title: "Is firstledvault.com a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "firstledvault.com"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is firstledvault.com a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/firstledvault.com
assessed: 2026-10-25
---

# Is firstledvault.com a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** firstledvault.com shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 8 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafe (Google) | Risk |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the firstledvault.com homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/firstledvault.com/screenshots/first.png)

_What firstledvault.com served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Google, Kaspersky flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website, presented under the name firstledvault.com, is a very recently registered domain whose name suggests a digital-asset vault or ledger-style financial service. The only content captured from the homepage was a protective security interstitial, not a product or service page. No products, claims, or operator identity could be read from the site itself, so its apparent purpose can only be inferred from the name, and that purpose is not supported by any observable business content.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present and decisive. The domain is **confirmed blacklisted**. A major browser-protection reputation service classifies it under a social-engineering threat category, which is the category used for phishing and deceptive-site warnings. Several independent security engines also rate it malicious or suspicious, and these include multiple top-tier vendors. When the homepage was fetched, the edge provider served an interstitial titled as a suspected-phishing warning in place of the site, so the hosting layer's own screening appears to have reached a similar conclusion. Browser-behaviour testing found no wallet-drainer activity, clipboard manipulation, hidden forms, or credential posts to external destinations, but this does not offset the reputation findings. Eighteen console errors and heavy third-party request traffic were also recorded. A domain of this age with a social-engineering classification fits the lifecycle of a throwaway site built for deceptive onboarding or credential capture. No conflicting legal-entity names were observed, because no legal content could be captured. The risk therefore rests on the reputation findings, not on identity inconsistency. Evidence:

- Homepage: capture was met with a bot challenge (HTTP 403) whose page title read as a suspected-phishing notice.
- Reputation: a browser safe-browsing service lists the domain as social engineering. Eight security engines rate it malicious and three suspicious, including three top-tier vendors.
- Registration: domain registered 2026-08-29 (~0.16 years, ~57 days old), expiring 2027-08-29.
- Web archive: 1 archive snapshot, in 2026 only (first and last seen 2026-09-06, 1 year tracked), so there is no established history.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

No legal, terms, privacy, or about pages could be captured, and no licensing, registration number, or corporate entity can be attributed to the operator. Registrant details are incomplete, which amounts to **ownership opacity**. This is an administrative limitation and is not treated here as an identity contradiction. No regulator or third-party registry link supports the site, and no broker-reputation record exists for it. The missing disclosures are a verification gap, but the decisive concern is the confirmed blacklisting, not the absence of a license. Evidence:

- Homepage: only a roughly 400-character challenge screen was captured, with no legal entity, license, or registration reference.
- Registration: registered through NICENIC International Group Co., Limited, with registrant details incomplete.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), so hosting reveals nothing about the operator.
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by WE1 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-11-27 with 32 days remaining. DV confirms domain control, not business identity.

### What to Verify Next

Verification should be directed at the operator's claims before any contact, not at the site. If the site is linked to a specific financial or custody service, confirm that service's official domain through an independent source, such as a regulator's public register or a known official channel, and compare it character by character with this domain. Any license or registration claim should be checked directly with the named registry. Official support and contact channels should be confirmed through an offline or independently sourced route. Any message, advertisement, or referral that directed a person to this domain should be treated as potentially deceptive and reported to the platform it came from. Evidence:

- Homepage: no operator, license, or product claim was observable to check, so the reference point must come from outside the site.
- Registration: the domain is only about two months old, so any claim of long-standing operation is inconsistent with the record.
- Reputation: the confirmed safe-browsing classification means any prior link or invitation to this site warrants scrutiny.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is **critical-risk and clearly cautionary**. Confirmed multi-source blacklisting of a newly created domain with no verifiable operator or business content outweighs every technical signal in its favour. The site is best regarded as a probable phishing or social-engineering vehicle, and no apparent legitimacy can be attributed to it.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, with all observed addresses being Cloudflare edge servers. The origin server was not observable, so hosting cannot be independently verified. The certificate is valid, and the bot-protection layer behaved normally. These are mitigating technical hygiene factors only. Mainstream protective infrastructure is available to any registrant, including malicious ones, and it does not offset the reputation findings. A young domain with sparse DNS structure adds to the caution.


### Closing Assessment

Login, credential entry, wallet connection, account registration, and any payment or transfer should be avoided entirely. Passive viewing is the most that could be considered, and ideally the site should be left alone. Anyone who has already entered credentials or authorised a transaction should change the affected passwords, revoke any wallet permissions, and notify the relevant provider.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)
- The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`)

### 03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)

### 05 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of firstledvault.com.

- The request stayed on firstledvault.com. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-08-29. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-06. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3033::ac43:a2dd |
| Name servers | MELODY.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM, YAHIR.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | 0.16 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-08-29 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-06 |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 8 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 1 match |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about firstledvault.com at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [akserakaryakit.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/akserakaryakit.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [atplink.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/atplink.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [alfaristech.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/alfaristech.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [grupo-ichiban.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/grupo-ichiban.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [insurancebrokerssingapore.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/insurancebrokerssingapore.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [bharatsilks.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bharatsilks.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [proximatesolutions.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/proximatesolutions.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [embarqueja.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/embarqueja.com), another .com site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [xrpl-dex.pro](https://trustsniffer.com/report/xrpl-dex.pro), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [new2026-solrops.sbs](https://trustsniffer.com/report/new2026-solrops.sbs), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27)
- [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites)
- [How to revoke token approval after a scam site](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-revoke-token-approval-after-a-scam-site)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/firstledvault.com) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/firstledvault.com · assessed 2026-10-25.*
