--- title: "Is fomochart.fun Safe? Risk Report, Score 25/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "fomochart.fun" verdict: "Low Trust" title: "Is fomochart.fun Safe? Warning Signs, Score 25/100" trust_score: 25 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomochart.fun assessed: 2026-10-21 --- # Is fomochart.fun safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 25/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 25/100.** fomochart.fun is low-trust and potentially risky. Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | A Cloudflare interstitial warning states that the requested site has been reported for suspected phishing, with an option to ignore the warning and proceed. The underlying site content is not shown and cannot be assessed. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 29 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (5 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the fomochart.fun homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/fomochart.fun/screenshots/first.png) _What fomochart.fun served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview The website at fomochart.fun could not be viewed directly. On capture, visitors were shown only a security warning interstitial stating that the site "has been reported for potential phishing", with a prominent "Ignore & Proceed" option. No products, pricing, branding, legal pages or business model were visible, so the site's real purpose and operator cannot be established. It is a newly registered domain whose only observable content is that reputational warning. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This is the decisive section of the assessment. Independent threat-intelligence sources currently carry a **confirmed blacklist** listing for this domain. Several detection engines flag it as malicious and others as suspicious, and the phishing report is what triggered the interstitial. No brand impersonation was detected on the captured page, and no conflicting legal entities were observed. That is only because no underlying content was reachable, so these signals do not offset the blacklist. The warning page's "Ignore & Proceed" option exposes anyone who bypasses it to whatever the site serves behind the interstitial. The domain was also registered only weeks before capture, a pattern typical of short-lived phishing infrastructure. Operator details are incomplete (**ownership opacity**), which prevents any independent link between this domain and a real-world person or business. Credential entry, login and any financial interaction are unsafe. The captured page itself is not a phishing form: it contained no login form, hidden form or credential-capture element. Evidence: - Homepage capture: a security warning interstitial states the site "has been reported for potential phishing", with an "Ignore & Proceed" bypass button. - External reputation: 3 malicious and 2 suspicious verdicts from threat-intelligence engines, alongside a confirmed external blacklist listing. - Domain registered 2026-09-20 (~0.08 years, about 30 days old) through the registrar Dynadot Inc, with owner details incomplete. - Web archive: 5 snapshots, all in 2026 (1 year tracked), first seen 2026-09-20 and last seen 2026-10-06, so there is no established history. ### Regulatory Verification Notes No legal, terms, privacy, about or contact pages could be assessed, because only the warning interstitial was captured. No licence, registration number or regulator was claimed or observed, and no third-party broker database match exists for this name. This is therefore not a finding of regulatory non-compliance. It does mean there is no evidence of any authorised or regulated status that could balance the threat listing. The operator's identity remains unverified and cannot be inferred from the available material. Because the site could not be viewed, any financial-services, trading or investment claim it might make behind the warning should be treated as entirely unsubstantiated. Evidence: - Captured page: contains no legal entity name, licence claim, registration number or regulator reference. - Hosting network: AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US), country US. - Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE2 (DV, domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-19. This confirms only that the connection is encrypted, not who operates the site. - No match was found in the third-party broker reputation dataset. ### What to Verify Next The warning should not be bypassed with a personal or corporate account. If a link to this domain was received through an email, message, advertisement or social post, the sender should be contacted through a separately known channel to confirm they actually sent it. Any organisation claimed to be behind the site should be identified through its official, independently sourced website or a regulator's public register. Nothing should be inferred from the site's own wording. The domain should be re-assessed only after the threat listings have been removed or the registered operator has been established. If the site is encountered inside an organisation, the security team should be notified and the domain blocked at the perimeter. Evidence: - Homepage capture: the only offered action is to ignore the warning and proceed, and no operator or contact information is shown. - Capture status: access was blocked with an HTTP 403 and a bot challenge, so the underlying pages are unreviewed. - Captured page: zero forms and no login element were present, so no data-collection flow was observed. ### Summary Verdict The available evidence supports a clearly high-risk posture. Multiple independent threat sources flag the domain, and a confirmed blacklist listing exists. The domain is very new and its operator is unidentified. Nothing observable provides legitimacy evidence strong enough to counter these signals. The domain's technical hygiene is basic, and does not reduce the reputational risk. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and every observed address is an edge address. The real origin server was not observable. A valid domain-validated TLS certificate is also in place. This is a mitigating factor only, and it does not offset the external threat detections. Edge-only visibility prevents independent verification of where the site's content is actually hosted, and the protective layer cannot vouch for the operator or the content behind it. ### Closing Assessment Treat the domain as unsafe for any login, credential entry, payment or wallet interaction. Do not bypass the browser's security warning, and do not download anything from it. Where possible, the link should be reported to the organisation's security team or the relevant anti-phishing reporting channel. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, hosting and network. ### 01 External reputation - An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`) ### 02 Page content - The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`) - The review of the page content rated it moderate risk. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RISK_MED`) - The browser raised a warning while loading the page. (Page content `rule:PAGE_BROWSER_FLAGS_SUSPICIOUS`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) - The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of fomochart.fun. - The request stayed on fomochart.fun. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under Dynadot Inc. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-09-20. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-20. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Dynadot Inc | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3037::6815:b28 | | Name servers | abby.ns.cloudflare.com, hayes.ns.cloudflare.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YE2 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-19 | | Domain age | 0.08 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-09-20 | | Archive first seen | 2026-09-20 | | Archive snapshots | 5 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about fomochart.fun at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [nightbazaar.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nightbazaar.fun), another .fun site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 31/100) - [solution-interfaces.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/solution-interfaces.xyz), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 30/100) - [manindex.site](https://trustsniffer.com/report/manindex.site), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 35/100) - [motionindex.site](https://trustsniffer.com/report/motionindex.site), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 41/100) - [allox.shop](https://trustsniffer.com/report/allox.shop), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 43/100) - [szrisk.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/szrisk.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100) - [proposals-papertrade.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/proposals-papertrade.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 30/100) - [dfvjndfjvdjfkvdnvjdvnj.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/dfvjndfjvdjfkvdnvjdvnj.com), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 50/100) - [launch-tool.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/launch-tool.info), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 30/100) - [papertrade-vote.xyz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/papertrade-vote.xyz), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 30/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer) - [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomochart.fun) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomochart.fun · assessed 2026-10-21.*