---
title: "Is fomovotes.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "fomovotes.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is fomovotes.pages.dev a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomovotes.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-21
---

# Is fomovotes.pages.dev a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** fomovotes.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-21 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| What this site appears to be | A memecoin trading page for the token SPACEHOOD on Robinhood Chain, showing a custodial cash balance, buy/sell controls, trader PnL posts with a '100x' claim, and paid 'fomo votes' that boost token visibility. No operator identity, legal status, contact details, or disclosures are present. |

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 3 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Listed as unsafe (Google) | Risk |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | 1 snapshot (1 snapshot) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the fomovotes.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/fomovotes.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What fomovotes.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-21. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.
- The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a single-page memecoin trading interface for a token called SPACEHOOD, which the page says is on Robinhood Chain. It runs as a subdomain on a shared free-hosting platform. The page shows a custodial cash balance with a "Deposit more" prompt and buy and sell controls with preset amounts from $10 to $1000. It also shows a leaderboard of trending memecoins and trader profit-and-loss posts. Its apparent business model is earning from trading activity and from paid "fomo votes" that buy token visibility, with no operator named anywhere on the page.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Confirmed contradictions are present, and this is a high-risk site. Multiple independent threat-intelligence sources currently flag the site: a major browser safe-browsing service lists it for social engineering, and several security engines classify it as malicious. It is therefore **blacklisted**, and that status alone sets a cautionary posture. No conflicting legal identities and no brand impersonation were observed. The risk comes from the combination of external listings and the page's own mechanics. Funds are held in a custodial balance the user must top up before trading, and the page shows no fee schedule and no description of where deposited value goes. The page also promotes outsized returns. One trader post reads "many of you will never hit a 100x. I will." Listed tokens show gains such as 66,295% and 102,401%, and a trader's note refers to "400k in fees sitting there." None of these claims is backed by any verifiable evidence. The page lists thirteen tokens, several with non-Latin names. Its paid-visibility mechanic lets promoters buy prominence for tokens, a pattern commonly associated with pump-and-dump promotion. Evidence:

- Homepage and vote page: a custodial cash balance, "Deposit more" prompt, and buy/sell widget with fixed amounts up to $1000, shown with no fee or custody terms.
- Homepage: trader posts and leaderboard percentages, including a "100x" boast and the "400k in fees sitting there" remark, with no substantiation.
- Domain registered about 13 days ago (roughly 0.04 years old); web archive holds 1 snapshot, from 2026 (1 year tracked).
- Safe-browsing listing for social engineering plus 3 malicious detections from security engines, confirmed in the site's external reputation check.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The page discloses no operating company, legal status, licence, registration number, physical address, or contact channel. There is no terms page, privacy page, or about page. For a site that takes deposits and executes token purchases, this is a serious gap in disclosure. The operator's identity cannot be independently connected to any real-world person or business, and no regulatory standing is claimed or evidenced. No third-party broker or regulator record was matched. Absent registration is a transparency gap, not proof of fraud by itself. Here it sits alongside the confirmed external listings, which is why it matters for custody of user funds. Evidence:

- Homepage: no company name, licence, address, or contact details anywhere in the roughly 2,200 characters of page text.
- Page metadata: no description, no canonical link, and no structured data, consistent with a hastily assembled page.
- Served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US); TLS certificate issued by YE2 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2026-12-23.

### What to Verify Next

Any interaction should be treated as unsafe until the operator is independently identified. Establish the legal entity behind the service through an independent route, not through links or claims on the page. Confirm whether any financial regulator in the user's jurisdiction recognises a custodial token-trading service of this kind. Check the SPACEHOOD token contract and its liquidity and holder concentration independently on a public blockchain explorer, rather than relying on the page's own market statistics. Confirm official support and contact channels through an offline or independently sourced route. Evidence:

- Vote page: token contract address shown on the page can be checked against on-chain records.
- Homepage: stated holder count, liquidity, and top-holder share are unverified, page-supplied figures.
- Terms and contact pages: none exist, so no on-site route to the operator is available.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high risk. Confirmed external listings, a very recently created domain, an anonymous operator, and a deposit-first custodial model with extravagant return claims converge on the same conclusion. The valid encryption certificate and the clean connection behaviour do not outweigh these factors. The site cannot be treated as legitimate.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is served entirely through Cloudflare's CDN and web-application firewall, and every observed address belongs to its edge network, so the origin server is not visible. This protection is a mitigating factor only. It reflects a commonly used, reputable platform, not evidence of the operator's legitimacy. It also prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content changes. The valid DV certificate confirms only encrypted transport and says nothing about who runs the site.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be limited to read-only viewing at most. No credentials, deposits, wallet connections, or purchases should be made through it, and any funds already placed there should be treated as at risk and reported to the relevant platform or consumer authority.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-21 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, hosting and network, several checks together.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Page content
- The review of the page content rated it high risk. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RISK_HIGH`)
- The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`)
- The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG`)

### 03 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)

### 04 Several checks together
- Several independent checks pointed to risk at the same time. (Several checks together `rule:HYB_MULTIPLE_MODULES_HIGH_RISK`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNVERIFIED |
| Identity score | 30/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 50% |

- No on-site identity signals detected

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of fomovotes.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on fomovotes.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f70 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-23 |
| Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 1 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 3 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 1 match |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about fomovotes.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [bitcoininu.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitcoininu.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 23/100)
- [rewards-kucoin.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/rewards-kucoin.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [migration-playzap-en.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/migration-playzap-en.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [migrate-mypaal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/migrate-mypaal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [site-7880365033-coinvaultsupport-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/site-7880365033-coinvaultsupport-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [uniswap-views.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/uniswap-views.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [ledgerportal.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ledgerportal.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [oortech.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/oortech.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [22northsalon.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/22northsalon.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [228199.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/228199.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26)
- [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen)
- [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomovotes.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/fomovotes.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-21.*