--- title: "Is foxmeta.fun a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "foxmeta.fun" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is foxmeta.fun a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 55 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/foxmeta.fun assessed: 2026-10-19 --- # Is foxmeta.fun a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** foxmeta.fun shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-19 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | Landing page for 'FoxMeta' pay-to-mine NFT service. Users are instructed to connect an Ethereum wallet and pay an upfront fee (tiered in ETH) to start a mining/minting process; the site promises manual minting and delivery within 24 hours after payment. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | None flagged it (VirusTotal) | Clear | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 61 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 26 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Never archived (No public history of this site) | Watch | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YR2) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the foxmeta.fun homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/foxmeta.fun/screenshots/first.png) _What foxmeta.fun served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-19. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - VirusTotal and Google Safe Browsing had no flags for this domain; its hosting IP carries AbuseIPDB reports below the confidence level TrustSniffer treats as a flag. - The operator behind the site could not be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. ## Full analysis ### Overview The website is a FoxMeta landing page presenting a pay-to-mine NFT service on Ethereum. It instructs visitors to connect a crypto wallet, pay an upfront ETH fee according to a selected priority tier, and await manual minting and delivery of a Fox NFT within 24 hours. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk No confirmed blacklist, phishing, impersonation, or conflicting-identity signal was observed. However, the site presents a materially unsafe transaction model: it requires payment before service, directs users to connect MetaMask, Rabby, or another injected wallet, and offers no demonstrated mechanism for independently validating the claimed mining process, winning hash, or NFT delivery. The page displays “payment confirmed” and “your Fox NFT is being prepared” despite showing no transaction or claim evidence, creating a pronounced gap between the service claims and the evidence presented. External reputation data includes one unconfirmed suspicious result, while the reported abuse activity is attributed to shared CDN infrastructure and is therefore not treated as evidence that this website itself generated those reports. Evidence: - The homepage requires an Ethereum wallet connection and upfront ETH payment before mining begins. - The homepage offers 2× Standard at 0.008 ETH, 5× Turbo at 0.020 ETH, and 10× Max at 0.040 ETH, with promised average completion times. - The homepage displays blank transaction, block-seed, nonce, hash, and hash-rate fields while promising manual NFT delivery within 24 hours. - Domain registration telemetry records creation on 2026-09-24T17:02:53Z and an age of 0.07 years. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The available page content does not identify a legal operating entity, licensing authority, registration number, or governing terms for the ETH-funded NFT service. The operator’s real-world identity is not independently verified, and the available disclosure state is unclear. These are verification deficiencies rather than proof of impersonation, but they are significant for a service that accepts cryptocurrency before delivery. No matching third-party broker profile was found; that absence is contextual only and does not establish licensing or regulatory standing. Evidence: - The supplied homepage is a single NFT-minting landing page and does not present a named legal entity or licensing disclosure. - The homepage identifies the project as “FoxMeta” and links only to the social account “@foxmeta_” for delivery updates. - The homepage presents a 777-unit supply and a manual-delivery promise without identifying contractual remedies, refund terms, or a responsible legal operator. ### What to Verify Next Before any sensitive interaction, an independent party should confirm the operator’s legal identity, the applicable licensing or registration position, and the ownership of the stated social account through a separate trusted channel. The wallet destination, transaction history, smart-contract address, NFT collection provenance, and an independently verifiable delivery record should be examined before any payment or wallet authorization. Any claimed service should also be tested for a documented refund process and enforceable customer support route. Evidence: - The homepage provides no contract address, transaction reference, block-seed result, nonce, or hash supporting the advertised mining process. - The homepage directs delivery inquiries to a social-media account rather than identifying an independent support or complaints channel. - The page’s stated service flow places payment before minting and delivery, making transaction-level verification necessary before funds are committed. ### Summary Verdict The website has a critical sensitive-interaction risk posture. Available evidence is not sufficient to establish a trustworthy operator, and the combination of an upfront crypto-payment model, unsupported service claims, and limited accountability information makes financial or wallet-based engagement inappropriate on the present evidence. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is served through Vercel’s CDN/WAF infrastructure, with observed edge addresses on Amazon’s AS16509; the origin server was not observable in this analysis. This provides a protective hosting layer but does not validate the operator or the underlying NFT service. Evidence: - Hosted on AS16509, identified as AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US. - The infrastructure records two CDN edge IPs and zero identified origin candidates. - TLS uses issuer YR2 with DV validation and is valid to 2026-12-23T16:16:37+00:00. ### Closing Assessment The appropriate posture is to avoid wallet connection, payment, credential submission, and other sensitive interactions unless independent identity, transaction, and delivery verification produces satisfactory evidence. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-19 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by page content, hosting and network, several checks together. ### 01 Page content - The review of the page content rated it high risk. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RISK_HIGH`) - The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`) - The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG`) - The page content shows at least one warning sign that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_SOME`) ### 02 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 03 Several checks together - No external feed lists the site, but its own page content reads as risky. (Several checks together `rule:HYB_POSITIVE_EXTERNAL_NEGATIVE_PAGE`) ### Signals weighed against the site - AbuseIPDB: 61 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.65 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website. ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 55/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 60% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of foxmeta.fun. - The request stayed on foxmeta.fun. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under Name.com, Inc.. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by vercel-dns.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-09-24. (Noted) - It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | Name.com, Inc. | | Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 64.29.17.65 | | Name servers | ns1.vercel-dns.com, ns2.vercel-dns.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (vercel) | | Resolved IP addresses | 2 | | Edge IP addresses | 2 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YR2 | | SSL expiry | 2026-12-23 | | Domain age | 0.07 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-09-24 | | Archive first seen | Not available | | Archive snapshots | 0 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 0 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 61 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about foxmeta.fun at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [pumps-live.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pumps-live.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [pump-gostream.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-gostream.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 24/100) - [embercurves.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/embercurves.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [pool2.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pool2.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 24/100) - [greenmorning.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/greenmorning.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [pump-streamfor.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-streamfor.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 16/100) - [pump-coin-live.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pump-coin-live.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [bitvavo.fun](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitvavo.fun), another .fun site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [portal-moonshot-c23.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/portal-moonshot-c23.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [crypto-gm2.netlify.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crypto-gm2.netlify.app), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether) - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 27, 2026: 7 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-27) - [No Age Distribution Yet for Suspicious Websites](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/no-age-distribution-suspicious-websites) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/foxmeta.fun) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/foxmeta.fun · assessed 2026-10-19.*