--- title: "Is frogman.top a Scam? Trust Score 0/100" source: TrustSniffer type: Website trust & fraud report subject: "frogman.top" verdict: "Critical Risk" title: "Is frogman.top a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100" trust_score: 0 classification_confidence: 75 canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/frogman.top assessed: 2026-10-20 --- # Is frogman.top a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100 ## Verdict **Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** frogman.top shows high-risk / scam indicators. This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site. Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk Assessed 2026-10-20 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%. | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | What this site appears to be | Frogman token airdrop page offering free FROGMAN tokens to Solana wallet holders who connect a wallet and follow social accounts, with a 7-day countdown, unverifiable DeFi claims, and obfuscated text. | ## Evidence status and limitations Evidence completeness: Not recorded - The real-world operator identity was not independently verified. - Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report. ## At a glance The checks that decide most of this verdict. | Check | Result | Status | | --- | --- | --- | | Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk | | Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear | | Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear | | Domain age | 15 days old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk | | Web archive | Archived since 2026 (2 snapshots) | Clear | | Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted | ## The page as captured ![Screenshot of the frogman.top homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/frogman.top/screenshots/first.png) _What frogman.top served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-20. The page may look different now._ ## Key findings - Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk. - Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity). - Public web-archive history exists since 2026. - At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time. ## Full analysis ### Overview Frogman is a single-page cryptocurrency token airdrop landing site. It invites visitors to claim "free" FROGMAN tokens on the Solana blockchain by connecting a wallet and following the project's social account. The page is built around a seven-day countdown, "revolutionary DeFi project" language and headline usage figures. Its apparent purpose is to promote and distribute a newly launched token by driving wallet connections, and it discloses no revenue model, team or product. ### Scam/Impersonation Risk This assessment is clearly cautionary. The decisive finding is that external threat-intelligence sources currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, which amounts to a **confirmed blacklist-level reputational hit**. Infrastructure protections cannot offset it. No conflicting legal identities and no impersonation of a known brand were observed, so the concern comes from reputation and page behaviour, not from a detected clone. The homepage text is deliberately obfuscated. Cyrillic look-alike characters and invisible zero-width characters are interleaved through the words "Frogman", "Claim Tokens" and "Connect Wallet". This is a recognised technique for evading keyword-based detection and brand-protection scanning, and a legitimate project has little reason to use it. The pressure mechanics reinforce the concern: a seven-day countdown, "limited time opportunity for early adopters" and a "Connect Wallet" call to action. The page's numbers are also internally inconsistent. It cites 50,000 participants and 1,000,000 total tokens, yet also claims "millions of users", 150K+ active users, $2.5M total volume and 24/7 support, on a domain that is only days old. A token ticker showing a price of $0.000004 with a daily change adds a veneer of market activity with no verifiable source. The sandbox did not observe wallet-draining behaviour, hidden forms or cloaking, but wallet interaction was not exercised there, so this does not clear the claim flow. Evidence: - Homepage: the visible text mixes look-alike Cyrillic characters and zero-width characters into the project name and the claim and wallet buttons. - Homepage: the page combines a seven-day countdown, free-token eligibility steps (active Solana user, hold some tokens, follow on Twitter) and a wallet-connection prompt. - Homepage: it claims "millions of users" and 150K+ active users, but also shows only 50,000 airdrop participants, with no verifiable source for either. - Domain registered 2026-10-07 (about 13 days old, ~0.04 years); the web archive holds 2 snapshots spanning 2026-10-08 to 2026-10-09 (1 year tracked), consistent with a brand-new, unseasoned presence. ### Regulatory Verification Notes The site presents no verifiable legal entity, licence, registration number, business address or named team. The footer lists Legal, Privacy Policy, Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Disclaimer, Whitepaper, Roadmap and Tokenomics, but the captured page exposed no working internal links, so none of these could be reviewed. The only identity claim is a "© 2026 Frogman" notice, which names no company. Registration details show ownership opacity, and the operator cannot be independently connected to any real-world person or organisation. No third-party broker or regulatory record matched this name. A token airdrop of this kind is not shown to be authorised under any financial or digital-asset regime, and the site makes no licensing claim. Evidence: - Homepage footer: legal and policy entries are listed as text, but no legal entity, address or registration number accompanies them. - Domain registered through the registrar PDR Ltd, with owner details incomplete. - Served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US). - TLS certificate issued by YE2 (DV, domain validation only), valid to 2027-01-05; this confirms encryption, not the operator's identity. ### What to Verify Next No wallet interaction should be tested until the project can be validated independently. Reviewers should look for an official token contract address, published through a source other than this page, such as a reputable token explorer or a long-standing official social profile. The existence, age and follower history of the referenced social account should be checked, along with whether it is the same account that announced the airdrop. The page's usage and volume figures should be compared with on-chain data, which is the only credible way to test them. Any official support or contact route should be confirmed independently rather than through this page. Any claim of regulated status should be checked with the relevant registry before the project is treated as an authorised offering. Evidence: - Homepage: no token contract address, audit report or tokenomics detail is present, so the token cannot be matched to an on-chain asset. - Homepage: the airdrop requires following a social account, but the page exposes no link or handle that could be validated. - Homepage: the headline volume, user and participant figures cannot be traced to a verifiable source. ### Summary Verdict The overall posture is high-risk and clearly cautionary. A confirmed reputation hit, deliberate text obfuscation, urgency-driven wallet solicitation and a newly created, unverifiable identity converge into a consistent picture of a site that should not be trusted for sensitive interaction. The supportive technical basics, valid encryption and a clean sandbox run, are consistent with any freshly deployed site and do not offset the adverse indicators. ### Infrastructure Integrity The site is fronted by Cloudflare's CDN and WAF. All observed addresses are CDN edge servers, and the true origin server was not observable. This mitigates direct exposure to attack and shows the site is operational and stably served. It is only a mitigating factor, because the same edge-only visibility prevents independent hosting verification and can mask rapid content swaps. Mainstream infrastructure is available to any registrant and gives no assurance about the operator's intent. ### Closing Assessment The site should be treated as read-only at most. Wallets should not be connected, no signatures or transactions should be approved, and no seed phrases, credentials or funds should be committed to any claim flow on it. Anyone who has already connected a wallet should review and revoke its token approvals and consider moving assets to a fresh wallet. _Written analysis generated 2026-10-20 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._ ## What the analysis found 4 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, page content, hosting and network, several checks together. ### 01 External reputation - A small number of malware engines flagged this domain. On its own this is a weak signal. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_MEDIUM`) ### 02 Page content - The review of the page content rated it high risk. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RISK_HIGH`) - The page shows few of the signs expected from a trustworthy operator. (Page content `rule:PAGE_TRUST_QUALITY_LOW`) - The page content shows three or more warning signs that deceptive sites commonly use. (Page content `rule:PAGE_RED_FLAGS_STRONG`) ### 03 Hosting and network - The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`) ### 04 Several checks together - Several independent checks pointed to risk at the same time. (Several checks together `rule:HYB_MULTIPLE_MODULES_HIGH_RISK`) ## Identity verification | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Status | UNVERIFIED | | Identity score | 30/100 | | Identity verification confidence | 50% | - No on-site identity signals detected _Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._ ## What TrustSniffer observed First-party facts recorded during the assessment of frogman.top. - The request stayed on frogman.top. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear) - Registration is published under PDR Ltd. (Clear) - DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted) - The registration is paid up to 2027-10-07. (Noted) - The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-10-08. (Clear) - It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted) ## Domain intelligence | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Registrar | PDR Ltd | | Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US | | Country | US | | Server IP | 2606:4700:3034::ac43:bf59 | | Name servers | luciana.ns.cloudflare.com, fonzie.ns.cloudflare.com | | CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) | | Resolved IP addresses | 4 | | Edge IP addresses | 4 | | Likely origin IP addresses | 0 | | SSL issuer | YE2 | | SSL expiry | 2027-01-05 | | Domain age | 0.04 years (continuous registration) | | Domain expiry | 2027-10-07 | | Archive first seen | 2026-10-08 | | Archive snapshots | 2 | | Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches | ## About this assessment **Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com) A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about frogman.top at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present. TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed. ## Related on TrustSniffer - [vavada-k9p.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vavada-k9p.top), another .top site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [vavada-v6x.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vavada-v6x.top), another .top site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [melbethindi.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/melbethindi.top), another .top site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [vodka-n6q.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/vodka-n6q.top), another .top site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [gunceladres2026.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gunceladres2026.top), another .top site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 17/100) - [icmd77.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/icmd77.top), another .top site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [ordelynetty.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/ordelynetty.top), another .top site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 15/100) - [flarenetworks.top](https://trustsniffer.com/report/flarenetworks.top), another .top site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 5/100) - [10kstartups-pour-changer-le-monde.fr](https://trustsniffer.com/report/10kstartups-pour-changer-le-monde.fr), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 2/100) - [1056787.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/1056787.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100) - [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory - [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band - [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment - [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening - [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares ## Guides - [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 26, 2026: 11 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-26) - [99.5% of flagged USDT wallets were frozen](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/99-5-of-flagged-usdt-wallets-were-frozen) - [Trading Platform Scam: Checking a Blocked Balance](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/trading-platform-scam-checking-a-blocked-balance) --- *Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/frogman.top) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/frogman.top · assessed 2026-10-20.*