---
title: "Is frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app Safe? Risk Report, Score 31/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app"
verdict: "Low Trust"
title: "Is frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app Safe? Score 31/100"
trust_score: 31
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app
assessed: 2026-10-25
---

# Is frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app safe? TrustSniffer's low-trust assessment: 31/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Low Trust, trust score 31/100.** frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app is low-trust and potentially risky.

Several risk patterns were present. Do not send money or personal details until you have verified this business another way.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 1 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 91 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Web archive | Never archived (No public history of this site) | Watch |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WR1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app/screenshots/first.png)

_What frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Overview

This website is a minimal, single-purpose login page titled "SNURM OS". It is served from a free-tier application subdomain of a commercial front-end hosting platform rather than from a standalone branded domain. The captured page exposes only a short fragment of text and three password-entry forms. It describes no products, company, or business model. Its apparent purpose is an account-access portal for a web application, most likely a development or staging deployment.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site is on an external threat-intelligence blacklist. Of the multi-engine reputation scans, one engine returned a malicious detection and two returned suspicious detections. This is a confirmed adverse reputational finding and the decisive driver of the cautionary posture. It is compounded by the page's function: a login surface with three password forms, on an unbranded subdomain with no visible brand, operator, or explanation. That is the structure on which credential-harvesting pages are commonly built. No conflicting legal identities, brand impersonation claims, or wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack, hidden-form, or cloaking behaviour were observed. The sandbox recorded stable page responses and no outbound requests to third parties. Those observations argue against active data exfiltration during testing, but they do not offset the blacklist. A page that behaves quietly in a sandbox can still serve as a credential-capture front, so the site should be treated as high-risk for any sensitive interaction. Evidence:

- Login page: three password-entry forms were detected on a page carrying only a very small amount of text and the title "SNURM OS".
- Reputation sources: the domain is on an external blacklist, backed by one malicious and two suspicious engine detections.
- Sandbox behaviour: three successful runs showed no external network calls, no wallet or clipboard activity, and no cloaking.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The page discloses no legal entity, licence, registration number, terms, privacy policy, or contact route. Operator identity could not be independently connected to any real-world brand or person, and ownership is opaque because the site sits on a shared platform subdomain. For a page requesting passwords, this lack of disclosure is a material gap. It is a verification gap in its own right, but the elevated risk rests on the blacklist, not on the absence of a licence. The valid but low-assurance transport encryption and the identified hosting network show that the site is technically functional. They say nothing about who operates it. No third-party broker or regulatory record was matched. Evidence:

- Hosting: served from AS16509 (AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US) through the Vercel platform.
- Transport encryption: the TLS certificate is a domain-validated certificate issued by WR1, valid to 2026-11-27 (32 days remaining). Domain validation confirms control of the hostname only, not operator identity.
- Login page: it names no company and offers no terms, privacy, or contact pages.

### What to Verify Next

Any organisation that directs users to this address should confirm, through its own official and independently sourced channels, that it issued the link. Anyone who has already entered credentials here should change them on the legitimate service and enable multi-factor authentication. The "SNURM OS" name should be checked against the vendor or project the visitor expects to access. Official support contact channels should be confirmed independently before any account activity. Evidence:

- Login page: the title "SNURM OS" is the only identifying text on the captured page.
- Blacklist status: the external blacklist listing should be rechecked against current reputation sources before any decision to engage.

### Summary Verdict

The available evidence places this site in an elevated-risk category. The confirmed blacklist listing is decisive, and the site's identity remains unverified. Its technical hygiene and quiet sandbox behaviour do not outweigh that reputational finding.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind a trusted CDN/WAF on Amazon-hosted edge addresses, and the true origin server is not observable. This mitigates direct hosting exposure but cannot offset the reputational findings. Edge-only visibility also prevents independent hosting verification and could mask rapid content changes. A sizeable number of abuse reports attach to the shared provider IP serving the site. Because that address is shared platform infrastructure, those reports are discounted and are not attributed to this site.


### Closing Assessment

The site should be treated as read-only at most. No credentials, personal data, or financial information should be entered, and no files should be downloaded from it, until its operator is independently identified and the blacklist listing is cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

2 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- Several malware engines flagged this domain. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_HIGH`)

### 02 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)
- The security certificate only proves control of the domain, not who operates it. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_SSL_DV_ONLY`)

### Signals weighed against the site

- AbuseIPDB: 91 reports on hosting IP 64.29.17.195 (Vercel, Inc, Content Delivery Network), 0% confidence. The reports are attributed to shared infrastructure, not specifically to this website.

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app.

- The request stayed on frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on AMAZON-02, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | AMAZON-02 - Amazon.com, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 64.29.17.195 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected |
| Resolved IP addresses | 8 |
| Edge IP addresses | 8 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WR1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-27 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | 0 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 1 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 91 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [node-live-6882-d3kx2ei95-vercel-project-key.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/node-live-6882-d3kx2ei95-vercel-project-key.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 30/100)
- [b-mp-web3-airdrop-and-nft-tdd1bolt.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/b-mp-web3-airdrop-and-nft-tdd1bolt.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [bsc-dl663k94x.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bsc-dl663k94x.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 35/100)
- [bitnestwebapp.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bitnestwebapp.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 27/100)
- [eth-arbitrage-bot.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/eth-arbitrage-bot.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 31/100)
- [seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/seedify-fund-burn.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 46/100)
- [aave-v2.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aave-v2.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 27/100)
- [aster-exchange.vercel.app](https://trustsniffer.com/report/aster-exchange.vercel.app), a similar name (Low Trust, 29/100)
- [biolinky.co](https://trustsniffer.com/report/biolinky.co), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 40/100)
- [sokabet.co.tz](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sokabet.co.tz), another site assessed as low-trust (Low Trust, 41/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 23, 2026: 8 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-23)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/frontend-eight-alpha-37.vercel.app · assessed 2026-10-25.*