---
title: "Is gonkadev.pages.dev a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "gonkadev.pages.dev"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is Pages a scam? gonkadev.pages.dev trust score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 55
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/gonkadev.pages.dev
assessed: 2026-10-29
---

# Is Pages a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment of gonkadev.pages.dev: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** gonkadev.pages.dev shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-29 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 55%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 11 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | Not available (No registration record was returned) | Noted |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by YE2) | Noted |
| Hosted by | CLOUDFLARENET (Server in US) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the gonkadev.pages.dev homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/gonkadev.pages.dev/screenshots/first.png)

_What gonkadev.pages.dev served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-29. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

This website is a web application served from a subdomain of a shared static-hosting platform, with an application path under the name "gonkadev". When analysed, the page presented to automated visitors was a security interstitial headed "Suspected Phishing", not a branded product page. Its apparent purpose could not be established from on-page content. The deployment pattern is that of a free, disposable project subdomain, not an independently branded business domain.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

Contradictory signals are present, and the posture is cautionary. Multiple independent threat-intelligence engines currently flag the site as malicious, including two tier-one security vendors, and the site is **blacklisted** by external reputation sources. The application path returned an access-denied response behind a bot-challenge page whose title labels the destination as suspected phishing. This is a platform-level warning that corroborates the external detections. It is not proof of a specific phishing kit. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed, and the reputational evidence is the decisive factor. The site's hostname also closely resembles the generic hosting-platform domain it sits under. That gives it a borrowed appearance of platform legitimacy, which attackers commonly exploit. Behavioural testing showed no wallet-connection prompts, clipboard tampering, hidden forms, or credential posts to external hosts. This is a mitigating observation, but it does not offset the reputation findings. The same testing showed that nearly all traffic went to external origins, with dozens of external background requests and several external POST submissions. Over a thousand page mutations followed interaction, and repeated script errors occurred. That profile is consistent with a heavily scripted, externally dependent front end whose data destinations cannot be vouched for. Evidence:

- Application path (/app): the page returned an access-denied response behind a bot-challenge interstitial titled "Suspected Phishing".
- External reputation: 11 engines rated the site malicious and 3 suspicious, and the aggregate crossed the threshold for a hard reputation cap.
- Behavioural sandbox: 54 external background requests and 5 external POSTs, with up to 96.9% of activity going to external origins.
- Behavioural sandbox: 16 console errors and 1,503 DOM mutations after interaction, with no wallet-drainer, clipboard-hijack or external password-form activity detected.

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The real-world operator could not be connected to any identifiable person or company, and no licensing, registration or legal-entity information could be assessed. The captured page was a security interstitial, so no terms, privacy or about pages were available to evaluate. This is a limit on the review, not a finding about what the operator discloses. No third-party broker or regulator-style record matched this site, so no outside signal supports any regulated status. Given the reputation findings above, any legitimacy claim made by the site cannot be taken at face value. Evidence:

- Site capture: the only content observed was a roughly 380-character interstitial, so no legal or identity pages were reviewable.
- Hosting: served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- Transport encryption: TLS certificate issued by YE2 (domain-validated only), valid to 2026-12-14. This confirms an encrypted connection but says nothing about who operates the site.
- Broker intelligence: no match, so no third-party reputational context exists in either direction.

### What to Verify Next

Before any interaction, the intended destination should be confirmed through a channel independent of this address. If the site is claimed to belong to a company or project, its official domain should be obtained directly from that organisation's known website or documented support route. The operator's licensing or registration status should then be checked in the relevant public registry, if the activity is regulated. Anyone who already visited the site and entered credentials or approved wallet or app permissions should treat them as exposed, rotate the credentials, and revoke the permissions. The hosting platform's abuse process is the right route for reporting or clarifying the suspected-phishing label. The site should be re-assessed only after the hosting platform or the operator confirms that the flag has been cleared. Evidence:

- Application path (/app): the interstitial warning is the platform's own signal and is the first item to resolve.
- External reputation: the current malicious detections must clear across the engines before any re-assessment is meaningful.
- Identity: no verifiable operator identity exists, so ownership must be established offline.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is high-risk. Strong, converging external threat detections and a platform-level phishing warning outweigh the technically valid encryption and the behavioural absence of drainer-style tactics. The site's identity is unverified, and the evidence provides no basis for treating it as a legitimate, trustworthy destination.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site sits behind Cloudflare's CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are edge nodes of that network. The origin server was not observable, so the real hosting location cannot be independently established. The edge network is reputable and its address space is clean. This is a mitigating factor only. It shows that the content is delivered through a well-run network and says nothing about the content itself, and it cannot offset the reputation findings. The valid but domain-validated certificate adds encryption without any vetting of the operator.


### Closing Assessment

The site should not be used for login, credential entry, wallet connection or any financial interaction. Any visit should be limited to passive viewing, ideally from an isolated browser or environment. Access should be reconsidered only after the hosting platform and the external threat-intelligence sources clear the warnings.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-29 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

3 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)
- The structure of the page changed sharply while it was loading. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_DOM_DENSITY_SPIKE`)
- The page produced an unusually high number of errors while it ran. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_CONSOLE_ERRORS_HIGH`)
- The page made many background requests to other domains while it was open. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_XHR_HEAVY`)

### 03 Registration and ownership
- The public registration record for this domain is incomplete. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_INCOMPLETE`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 30% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of gonkadev.pages.dev.

- The request stayed on gonkadev.pages.dev. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | Not available |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:310c::ac42:2f29 |
| Name servers | Not available |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | YE2 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-12-14 |
| Domain age | Not available (no registration date was returned) |
| Domain expiry | Not available |
| Archive first seen | Not available |
| Archive snapshots | Not counted (archive lookup incomplete) |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 11 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about gonkadev.pages.dev at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [izumi-finance.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/izumi-finance.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [tg-nestsusds-com.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/tg-nestsusds-com.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [faucetdapps.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/faucetdapps.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 17/100)
- [sentioai.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/sentioai.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [nervos-mainnet.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/nervos-mainnet.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [waytosecureyo-xpxtoksvpemil.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/waytosecureyo-xpxtoksvpemil.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [custodial-dextradingclaims.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/custodial-dextradingclaims.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 5/100)
- [x-validator-gateway-hub.pages.dev](https://trustsniffer.com/report/x-validator-gateway-hub.pages.dev), a similar name (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [summitcapitalpatners.info](https://trustsniffer.com/report/summitcapitalpatners.info), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 14/100)
- [pee-files.nl](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pee-files.nl), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 29, 2026: 22 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-29)
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 28, 2026: 45 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-28)
- [How to check if TRC20 USDT is genuine Tether](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/how-to-check-if-trc20-usdt-is-genuine-tether)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gonkadev.pages.dev) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/gonkadev.pages.dev · assessed 2026-10-29.*