---
title: "Is gprosol.vip a Scam? Trust Score 0/100"
source: TrustSniffer
type: Website trust & fraud report
subject: "gprosol.vip"
verdict: "Critical Risk"
title: "Is gprosol.vip a Scam? Risk Report, Score 0/100"
trust_score: 0
classification_confidence: 75
canonical_url: https://trustsniffer.com/report/gprosol.vip
assessed: 2026-10-25
---

# Is gprosol.vip a scam? TrustSniffer's high-risk assessment: 0/100

## Verdict


**Verdict: Critical Risk, trust score 0/100.** gprosol.vip shows high-risk / scam indicators.

This assessment found strong scam indicators. Do not pay, sign in, or share personal details with this site.

Labels: Sensitive Interaction Risk, Governance Risk

Assessed 2026-10-25 by automated analysis. Classification confidence 75%.

## Evidence status and limitations


Evidence completeness: Not recorded

- The real-world operator identity was not independently verified.
- Module-level completeness metadata is unavailable for this legacy report.

## At a glance

The checks that decide most of this verdict.

| Check | Result | Status |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Malware engines | 8 flagged it (VirusTotal) | Risk |
| Google Safe Browsing | Not listed (Google) | Clear |
| Abuse reports on the host | 0% confidence (AbuseIPDB, 0 reports; shared hosting inflates reports) | Clear |
| Domain age | 2 months old (Most scam domains are under a year old) | Risk |
| Web archive | Archived since 2026 (3 snapshots) | Clear |
| Certificate | Encrypted connection (Issued by WE1) | Noted |

## The page as captured


![Screenshot of the gprosol.vip homepage captured during the TrustSniffer assessment](https://trustsniffer.com/outputs/gprosol.vip/screenshots/first.png)

_What gprosol.vip served when TrustSniffer captured it on 2026-10-25. The page may look different now._

## Key findings


- Automated classification: Sensitive Interaction Risk.
- Domain age: less than 1 year (registration continuity).
- Public web-archive history exists since 2026.
- At least one reputation service TrustSniffer consulted had flagged this domain at assessment time.

## Full analysis


### Security Alert

Fortinet, Kaspersky, Sophos flagged this site in external intelligence checks, indicating elevated compromise/scam exposure that requires immediate caution.

GPRO — Capture The Squeeze is a single-page website on the gprosol.vip domain. It presents a short landing page (roughly one screen of text) under a title that suggests a market or trading-themed product. The captured content does not establish a clear product, operator, or business model, so its apparent purpose is an unconfirmed online service of undetermined nature.


### Scam/Impersonation Risk

The site shows **confirmed contradictory signals**, and the most serious is an external reputation conflict. Several major security vendors currently flag the domain as malicious or suspicious, and it is listed on external blacklists. That is a decisive adverse finding, not a marginal one. The domain is also newly registered and has almost no archived history, which is the profile typical of disposable or short-lived infrastructure. In sandbox testing the homepage made repeated requests to third-party destinations, several of them outside commonly recognised services. It also produced a high number of browser console errors and performed a clipboard write. No wallet-connection prompts, credential forms posting to external hosts, hidden forms, or content cloaking were observed. No brand impersonation or conflicting legal identities were observed either. The elevated risk therefore rests on the blacklist and detection evidence and on the domain's age, not on a demonstrated spoofing of a known brand. The evidence does not show whether the operator is acting deliberately or the site has been compromised. Evidence:

- The homepage and its domain are flagged malicious by eight security engines and suspicious by three, including several tier-one vendors. The domain also appears on external blacklists.
- Homepage sandbox runs showed six external data requests, three to non-whitelisted destinations, fifteen console errors, and a clipboard write event.
- The domain was registered on 2026-09-01 (about 0.15 years, roughly 53 days old).
- Only 3 archive snapshots exist, spanning 2026-09-09 to 2026-09-22 (1 year tracked).

### Regulatory Verification Notes

The site's identity and legal disclosures cannot be confirmed from the available evidence. The captured homepage gives no clear operator name, legal entity, licence, or registration reference, and no independent source ties the domain to a real-world company or person. No third-party broker or regulatory-database match exists, so there is no external reputational signal for or against a regulated status. Absent licensing information is a verification gap, not evidence of wrongdoing. Here it adds to a picture already dominated by the reputational findings. The site's transport encryption is valid, but it is a basic domain-validated certificate that is easy to obtain and does not vouch for the operator. Evidence:

- The homepage (the only page captured) names no operator, legal entity, licence, or registration number.
- The domain was registered through NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED, with an expiry of 2027-09-01.
- Served from AS13335 (Cloudflare, Inc., US).
- The TLS certificate was issued by WE1 (DV level) and is valid to 2026-11-30, with about 36 days remaining.

### What to Verify Next

Any contact with the site should first be preceded by confirming who operates it, using sources independent of the site. That means searching the relevant company or financial-services registry for any entity the operator claims. It also means checking whether the operator's stated channels match those published by an organisation known to exist. Security teams should re-test the domain against current threat-intelligence sources, because a listing caused by a compromise may be cleared after clean-up. Any support or contact channel should be confirmed through an independent, offline route before use. The domain's continued short history and any change in its detection status should be monitored. Evidence:

- The homepage presents no verifiable corporate identity or regulator reference to check against a registry.
- The domain's archive history is only a few weeks long, so there is no earlier version of the site to compare against.
- The current detection and blacklist status is the main factor to re-test before any decision to engage.

### Summary Verdict

The overall posture is **high-risk and clearly cautionary**. Confirmed adverse reputation signals, combined with a very young domain and no independently verifiable operator, outweigh the few technical positives. Those positives, a valid certificate and an established network footprint, indicate competent setup, not legitimacy.


### Infrastructure Integrity

The site is delivered through a mainstream CDN and WAF, and all observed addresses are edge servers. The underlying origin host was not observable, so hosting cannot be independently verified. This protection is a mitigating factor only. It does not offset the reputation risk, and edge-only visibility can mask rapid content changes. The only infrastructure heuristic raised, a very young domain with few subdomains, is unconfirmed and consistent with the other findings.


### Closing Assessment

Interaction should be limited to passive, read-only viewing, and only from an isolated or non-sensitive environment if viewing is necessary. Logging in, entering credentials, making payments, or downloading anything from the site is not advised until the operator is independently identified and the security listings are cleared.


_Written analysis generated 2026-10-25 by the TrustSniffer Analysis Engine from the evidence in this report._

## What the analysis found

5 findings contributed to this verdict, raised by external reputation, hosting and network, history in the web archive, behaviour in a sandbox, registration and ownership.

### 01 External reputation
- An external threat feed lists this domain: either Google Safe Browsing marked it malicious, or a significant number of malware engines flagged it. (External reputation `rule:EXT_BLACKLIST_CRITICAL`)

### 02 Hosting and network
- The domain was registered less than three months ago. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_NEW_DOMAIN_90D`)
- The domain is young and has almost nothing else set up around it. (Hosting and network `rule:DNS_SPARSE_YOUNG_DOMAIN`)

### 03 History in the web archive
- The web archive has almost no record of this domain, which fits a site that is new. (History in the web archive `rule:ARCH_PEN_YOUNG_AND_SPARSE`)

### 04 Behaviour in a sandbox
- Most of what the page loaded came from other domains rather than from this one. (Behaviour in a sandbox `rule:BEHAV_EXTERNAL_RATIO_HIGH`)

### 05 Registration and ownership
- The registration record withholds contact details for the operator. (Registration and ownership `rule:KF_WHOIS_HIDDEN`)

## Identity verification


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Status | UNKNOWN |
| Identity score | 50/100 |
| Identity verification confidence | 15% |

- AI page analysis unavailable (page captured; identity not AI-verified)

_Identity verification measures whether the site can be independently connected to a real-world brand or person. It is separate from the classification confidence._

## What TrustSniffer observed

First-party facts recorded during the assessment of gprosol.vip.

- The request stayed on gprosol.vip. It was not redirected to another domain. (Clear)
- Registration is published under NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED. (Clear)
- DNS for this domain is served by cloudflare.com, across 2 name servers. (Noted)
- The registration is paid up to 2027-09-01. (Noted)
- The earliest public archive of this site is from 2026-09-09. (Clear)
- It is hosted on CLOUDFLARENET, from a server in US. (Noted)

## Domain intelligence


| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Registrar | NICENIC INTERNATIONAL GROUP CO., LIMITED |
| Hosting | CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US |
| Country | US |
| Server IP | 2606:4700:3035::6815:f3c |
| Name servers | kenia.ns.cloudflare.com, vicky.ns.cloudflare.com |
| CDN / edge network | Detected (cloudflare) |
| Resolved IP addresses | 4 |
| Edge IP addresses | 4 |
| Likely origin IP addresses | 0 |
| SSL issuer | WE1 |
| SSL expiry | 2026-11-30 |
| Domain age | 0.15 years (continuous registration) |
| Domain expiry | 2027-09-01 |
| Archive first seen | 2026-09-09 |
| Archive snapshots | 3 |
| Reputation | VirusTotal: 8 flagged \| AbuseIPDB: 0% confidence, 0 reports \| Google Safe Browsing: 0 matches |

## About this assessment


**Was this report useful?** Tell other people what you think of TrustSniffer, good or bad. An honest review helps others decide whether to rely on these checks. [Review TrustSniffer on Trustpilot](https://www.trustpilot.com/review/trustsniffer.com)

A trust score summarises the evidence TrustSniffer could collect about gprosol.vip at assessment time. It is a starting point for your own judgement, not a guarantee: a high score means the signals were consistent with a legitimately operated site, a low or critical score means several risk patterns were present.

TrustSniffer assesses a website from the evidence it can collect at a point in time: domain registration and age, hosting and certificate, the content the site served, and third-party reputation feeds. A score is a summary of that evidence, not a guarantee and not a legal finding. There is no human rating and no user review in it. A site can change after it is assessed.

## Related on TrustSniffer
- [00808.vip](https://trustsniffer.com/report/00808.vip), another .vip site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [pay2world.vip](https://trustsniffer.com/report/pay2world.vip), another .vip site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [viptradesignal.vip](https://trustsniffer.com/report/viptradesignal.vip), another .vip site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [defilending-pool.vip](https://trustsniffer.com/report/defilending-pool.vip), another .vip site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 11/100)
- [yeetokens.vip](https://trustsniffer.com/report/yeetokens.vip), another .vip site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [crimecat.vip](https://trustsniffer.com/report/crimecat.vip), another .vip site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [jeanphil.vip](https://trustsniffer.com/report/jeanphil.vip), another .vip site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [bullvers.vip](https://trustsniffer.com/report/bullvers.vip), another .vip site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [123taxi.be](https://trustsniffer.com/report/123taxi.be), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [123candle.com](https://trustsniffer.com/report/123candle.com), another site assessed as critical-risk (Critical Risk, 0/100)
- [Every website and wallet TrustSniffer has assessed](https://trustsniffer.com/directory), the full risk directory
- [Other domains assessed as high-risk or phishing](https://trustsniffer.com/directory/phishing-domains), same verdict band
- [Check another website](https://trustsniffer.com/web-intelligence), run a new assessment
- [Check a crypto wallet address](https://trustsniffer.com/on-chain-risk), on-chain screening
- [The TrustSniffer Risk Index](https://trustsniffer.com/stats), how this verdict compares

## Guides
- [Stablecoin Freezes, Oct 24, 2026: 15 Wallets](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/stablecoin-freeze-report-2026-10-24)
- [Fake Airdrop Sites Show a Number, Not a Transfer](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/fake-airdrop-sites-show-a-number-not-a-transfer)
- [Crypto Scam Websites in 2026: What a List Misses](https://trustsniffer.com/blog/crypto-scam-websites-2026-what-a-list-misses)

---
*Source: [TrustSniffer](https://trustsniffer.com/report/gprosol.vip) — independent automated trust & fraud analysis. Cite as https://trustsniffer.com/report/gprosol.vip · assessed 2026-10-25.*